You can reach the snake here:
Phone: (803) 765-1192 Business: (803) 738-7655
Let the others know it's time to do the right thing using these contacts:
https://www.richlandcountysc.gov/Government/County-Council/County-Council-Members
Fuck commies
Maricopa BOS also hasn't provided chain of custody from Nov. 3rd - April 21st. Arrest these traitors now!
.
Ok so we all know that this woman Letitia James ran on a platform of Personally going after then-President Trump:
Any illegalities involving Trump’s real estate holdings in New York, highlighting the October New York Times investigation into the president’s finances.
The June 2016 Trump Tower meeting with a Russian official.
Examine government subsidies Trump received, which were also the subject of Times investigative work.
Whether he is in violation of the emoluments clause in the U.S. Constitution through his New York businesses. Continue to probe the Trump Foundation.
She ran on a Personal vendetta I love how not One liberal democrat can tell the truth on the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting I'm going to show you the truth. the truth that every democrat has kept hidden from you. Back in May of 2020, Richard Grenell DNI threatened Adam Schiff to release the Russia probe transcripts from the House Intelligence Committee Either he did, or Grenell was going to
There were 57 transcripts of closed-door interviews conducted in the course of the House's probe into Russia’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.
All 57 had no evidence of Anything, nothing, zip, zero. The best reply coming from Former DNI James Clapper who when his OWN ass is on the line said **"I never saw any direct empirical evidence that the Trump campaign or someone in it was plotting/ conspiring with the Russians to meddle with the election." This from the Director of National intelligence ** before Mueller is hired His statement is from July 17, 2017 So now this is for all your liberal idiot friends who continually bring the Trump Tower Meeting https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/read-newly-released-russia-probe-transcripts-from-the-house-intelligence-committee
This site has all the released interviews. I will now quote sections of the interview with ANATOLI SAMOCHORNOV the Russian interpreter who was present for the entire meeting Tuesday, November 28, 2017, https://d3i6fh83elv35t.cloudfront.net/static/2020/05/as46.pdf Washington, D.C. The interview in the above matter was held in Room HVC-304, the Capitol, commencing at 2:10 p.m.
Present: Representatives Ros-Lehtinen, Himes, Quigley, Swalwell, and Castro. (YES ERIC SWALWELL)
(page 47) Q So what interpretations did you provide Ms. Veselnitskaya during the June 9 Trump Tower meeting?
A-So as I have described, we walked in, and I was there when the pleasantries were exchanged and cards were exchanged. And then we were sat down. And I interpreted the words of Ms. Veselnitskaya and she spoke for maybe 3 or 4 minutes
Q What did she speak about?
A She talked about -- again, this is my recollection -- she spoke that during the course of her research into the Prevezon case, she uncovered financial irregularities by Mr. Browder and also by his clients, the Ziff Brothers. And that also, she alleged that Ziff Brothers were contributors -- and here, again, I don't remember -- either to the DNC or to Mrs. Clinton's campaign.
Q So say that last part again. I am sorry.
A I don't have the exact recollection of to whom she alleged the money went, but it was either the DNC or Hillary Clinton's campaign.
Q That's the irregularities, the financial irregularities that Ms. Veselnitskaya discovered from her dealings with the Prevezon matter.
A Yes. MR. KRANTZ: Let me make sure. [Discussion off the record.]
MR. SAMOCHORNOV: Yes, yes. So that Ziff Brothers have both invested improperly into Russia, have evaded taxes. So there were financial irregularities with them as investors and that they have also been donors to Democratic causes. BY
Q And this is what Ms. Veselnitskaya was saying --
A Yes.
Q -- during her 3 or 4 minutes of speaking? A Correct.
Q Did she say anything else?
A No, not to my recollection.
Q Were you asked to translate from English back to Russian anything that was being said during the meeting to Ms. Veselnitskaya?
A Yes. I wasn't asked, I was just there --
Q Doing it.
A -- doing my job. So nobody specifically asked me. But Mr. Manafort reacted to what Ms. Veselnitskaya said. And he said something along the lines that the fact that there is a political contribution is not significant, that people contribute to both parties all the time. Something along those lines.
Q What else do you remember being said?
A- That's about it. And then Mr. Manafort kind of looked at his telephone or whatever device he had.
Q Who would you say was sort of leading, if anyone, the meeting? Was it being sort of quote, unquote, chaired by any one or was it just sort of an informal discussion by all folks that were there?
A- I never thought about it in those terms, but I think I would say that Mr. Donald Trump Jr. was the host.
Q Did Mr. Donald Trump Jr. say anything that you -- that you can remember along the lines of does anyone have any information that is -- would show then-candidate Secretary Clinton in a negative light that he could be provided at that meeting?
A No, I don't remember anything like that. I remember only one remark of Mr. Donald Trump Jr. and that's what he said in the conclusion after Ms. Veselnitskaya spoke. He said something -- and here again, I don't remember whether he said if or when -- but the phrase was something that when my father is President, we'll revisit that issue then. And that was his parting words when he said goodbye.
Q When you say he, you mean Donald Trump Jr.
A Donald Trump Jr.
Q And then he left the room?
A And then we left the room.
Q What did you understand to be the subject matter of Donald Trump Jr. parting words? What was he referencing?
A He just heard a presentation about the possibility of lifting the adoption ban. So I do know what he meant, but I assume he was reacting to what he heard for the past 15 minutes.
Q Sure. And the focus of the meeting then would have been regarding Russian adoptions and the adoption ban. And Mr. Donald Trump Jr. at the end of the meeting, as you best recollect, said, well, if or when his father is President, you can revisit the issue. Is that correct?
A That is correct, yes.
Q Do you recall if anyone else in the meeting, six or eight people, however many there were there, at any portion during the meeting stated that they would be willing or could provide information that would cast then candidate Clinton in a negative light to the Donald Trump campaign?
A No. And against the advice of my lawyer, if I heard, especially after the publicity and something would come to mind, I would go to the relevant authorities. But I've never heard anything about the elections being mentioned at that meeting at all or in any subsequent discussions with Ms. Veselnitskaya.
Q So to the best of your recollection, during the June 9th meeting with Donald Trump Jr. and about six or seven others, there was no mention of anything regarding elections, with the U.S. Presidential race, or any campaigns?
A No, sir.
THE MEETINGS WERE ABOUT ADOPTIONS. THAT'S WHAT YOU CAN TELL ALL THE LYING LIBERAL IDIOTS Ms. Veselnitskaya Spoke about lifting the Sanctions so Putin would allow Americans to adopt Russian babies
On May 11th India announced the distribution of Ivermectin as a treatment for COVID patients: “The state health minister of Goa, Vishwajit Rane, said Monday that people will be given 12 mg of Ivermectin for a period of five days as prophylaxis to protect against Covid-19.”
THE RESULT: In the last week cases in India dropped 70 percent.
Mike Simpson is the Mitt Romney of Idaho.
That is a woman's correct and normal frame of reference.
"Get your feet off the coffee table and wipe up what you spilled and go to bed. You can read in bed for half an hour. Not more. You have school tomorrow."
That's fine at home.
NOT in the public sphere.
No, no, no. We do not need a National Mommy. Or Daddy.
And.... women are rarely the real, real, power. They are front of the house.
The best and smartest assist the invisible man, convey his works, counsel him, carry out his policy, but the main serious wielder of real power is rarely, rarely, really a woman. A strong man is hiding behind her. She is loyal and useful.
If you can count twenty queens of the historical past, who really had power, using up your fingers twice, realize that is over a period of ... two thousand years. Go ahead. Start with Boadicaa, queen of the Britons. Keep going through Theodora, and on and on. Maybe one per century, if that.
Not the way to bet.
