I am skeptical of many things, but he was suggesting that beau biden was murdered when he very clearly wasted away due to brain cancer. If he died by a gunshot and they said he committed suicide under mysterious circumstances—- fine. But the manner in which beau died was so clearly not murder that his comment is lowering our collective IQ and taking credibility away from our discussion.
Poison does not create a brain tumor that takes over 5 years to kill someone. Glioblastoma takes 3-5 years to kill someone. What kind of assassin would use any method that would take 5 years? At that point, any reasonable person would ask "which is more likely: the guy just naturally got cancer, or an assassin secretly gave him cancer that would take 5 years to kill him?". Emphasis on "reasonable".
I am skeptical of many things, but he was suggesting that beau biden was murdered when he very clearly wasted away due to brain cancer. If he died by a gunshot and they said he committed suicide under mysterious circumstances—- fine. But the manner in which beau died was so clearly not murder that his comment is lowering our collective IQ and taking credibility away from our discussion.
Heart attack gun doesnt exist.
Vehicles cant be remotely crashed.
Scalia died in his sleep, due to natural causes.
McCain and RBG died exactly when the media said they did.
Autopsys are never wrong or political.
CIA will know their disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.
So poison is out of the question?
Poison does not create a brain tumor that takes over 5 years to kill someone. Glioblastoma takes 3-5 years to kill someone. What kind of assassin would use any method that would take 5 years? At that point, any reasonable person would ask "which is more likely: the guy just naturally got cancer, or an assassin secretly gave him cancer that would take 5 years to kill him?". Emphasis on "reasonable".