23
Comments (19)
sorted by:
4
RiverFenix 4 points ago +4 / -0

This doesn't mean anything - the entire premise is that he bribed Ukraine (to open an investigation in exchange for a WH visit, which is ridiculous)..

This entirely ignored the fact Trump has a DUTY to root out corruption, especially when it comes to foreign policy performed by US personnel.

The FBI/DOJ can suck it

2
Tx50bmg 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’d already seen the hard drive contents before making the call. Checkmate, Lefttards.

1
Monz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

True

4
Redditcensorsyouandi 4 points ago +4 / -0

They may have cited laws, but provided no evidence of Trump breaking them.

This is of course more than sufficient in the warped and deranged mind to justify their malignant hatred.

Feelings over facts, as they constantly demonstrate.

2
red_pill_merchant 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly this. claims made in a reddit post without any actual official evidence.

4
Sea_Still 4 points ago +4 / -0

Looks like a list of crimes committed by Democrats

Pure projection

2
Monz [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm thinking something similar.

3
red_pill_merchant 3 points ago +3 / -0

looks like Russia hoax mixed with the tax return requests. If it was something of value for the lefties then they would have already gone to war with it.

3
Necrovoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Number 6 and 7 are the types of things that are routinely debated every time a new president is in place. Congress thinks they are the Supreme branch of the government and that everyone else is chattel that should lick their boots. When a president stands up to Congress, they always scream about it, but almost none of these complaints ever stand up when SCOTUS does examine them. Usually SCOTUS smacks Congress down.

Number 1-5 aren't the least bit based in reality. Joe Biden was the one committing all of these crimes, we even have him admitting counts 1,2 4, and 5 on video tape.

Joe Biden bragging about extorting the Ukrainian President into firing the Prosecutor investigating the company his son Hunter Biden worked for:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DrpXyXKZUR4

"If the prosecutor's not fired, you're not getting the money." Joe should be tried for treason, and if convicted, be subject to the full extent of the law.

2
Monz [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see. I was arguing with someone on Reddit to please explain what exctly GEOTUS did and this fool just drops this link down on me. With a essay further in. I'm going to go over this over the weekend to see what the context are for each "violation". I'll post it here if i get it done, could use some constructive feedback.

2
Necrovoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will exaggerate and twist anything they possibly can. If Trump stayed at a hotel in Poland, filled out a "how was the service" card and signed it, they would declare that his signature has a lot of value and thus he gave "something of value" to a foreigner.

Wherever a president stays, there will be Secret Service with him. The government pays for their hotel rooms, as they always have. If Trump stays at one of his own hotels, the leftists will claim that violates the Emoluments clause, because he is making money off the government. If a foreign dignitary stays at one of his hotels, they will claim Trump is taking money from a foreign government.

We elected Trump because we know he has billions and billions of dollars, and doesn't need a few extra thousand or a few extra million that bribes and under the table sweetheart deals would give him. Obama, Clinton, Biden and the rest would gladly take whatever money they can get, so long as they won't get caught. Trump can't be bribed. If he wanted some extra money from hotel rent, he wouldn't be giving up his 400K salary for four years. Would Biden or Harris give up 1.6 million dollars in pay?

Add to that, the fact that Trump knows many of his properties are and will be losing a lot of customer traffic due to TDS. I haven't seen a recent figure but in 2017, it was estimated this had cost him $600 MILLION dollars in lost wealth.

If you lose that kind of money, what kind of taxes do you pay? Nothing, and you have enough loss to carry forward a few years - hence, the result that he didn't owe much in taxes for awhile. This is another thing leftists can't understand. If they had run a small business, and had some years where they were barely afloat or lost some money, they would understand that you could end up with a tax bill that is extremely low at times. Ask a leftist what depreciation is, and if they can't respond, you know their knowledge of taxes is worthless for the issue of discussing Trump's and you can tell them so.

It goes on and on.

There are a lot of legal privileges a sitting US President has - just as members of Congress and Federal Judges do. Almost all of those have been through public debate and most have been tested and upheld by the courts as constitutional. Trump has had LESS leeway than most presidents have had in this regard. He is the most scrutinized president in history. It's not even close. Anything that they've had any remotely legal claim against Trump has been jumped on by a federal judge (the proverbial Hawaiian judge for example) or they've formed committees and acted on. Mueller and Impeachment were two good examples, and both turned up NOTHING.

The next time you are out walking, pick up the first piece of trash you see. That piece of trash is worth more than the claims of Trump violating the laws.

2
Monz [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said. I've known it was bullshit, I just needed the context to connect the dots. Once I get some free time I will look into this myself.

1
UndercoverSpez 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Why didnt the Democrats use this for impeachment?"

Impeachment was the best thing Democrats ever did in the sense that it can be used to cut through fake news.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Belleoffreedom 1 point ago +1 / -0

A list of laws, so what?

List the elements of each crime, the acts that supposedly violate them, and the evidence, otherwise, go home. Two sentences will do. A long opinion article with no facts is useless.

I said this about BO throughout his term in office, too.

You can look at the opener in the underlying article, that admits they have no witnesses or evidence.

1
Monz [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Side note: Damn, I love these flairs.

3
Redditcensorsyouandi 3 points ago +3 / -0

They are reeediculously high quality!

1
South_Florida_Guy 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd get more intelligent info looking at the dump I just took in the toilet than from anything posted on reddit.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1