5419
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
16
Mother_of_gains 16 points ago +16 / -0

If the Biden campaign or Hunter came out and made a public statement that these aren't Hunters emails or it isn't his computer, I MIGHT take this with a grain of salt.

But they know that there is way too much on there that can be directly tied back to Hunter. It would collapse around them.

What would your response be if someone fabricated evidence against you? Wouldn't you stand up and say "this is bullshit, none of that stuff is mine!"

And yet none of that is happening. It really is the exact same playbooks as crooked's emails. They don't address them at all and then start screaming about Russia. And the media enables them. Pretty fucked up.

8
FireannDireach 8 points ago +8 / -0

WSJ editorial board is calling for Joe to address these issues, publically, before the debate.

Seems the WSJ is taking this pretty seriously.

10
Mother_of_gains 10 points ago +10 / -0

How many times has Trump had to disavow "white supremacy" for events that he isn't connected to at all?

Wouldn't it be reasonable for a reporter to say "Joe, even if you didn't know your son was doing this, do you disavow his actions?" Forget the porn stuff for a second. Biden made millions at the very least promising to get access to his dad. There is literally no other reason for any of these companies to hire him. None.

1
dorsal_fin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It helps when you control the media and they do it for you. It's just some right-wing talking points.

0
Spirit_of_Resistance 0 points ago +2 / -2

And when tucker spends a whole show taking the Russia bait it's further evidence he's just as controlled