5419
Comments (244)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
2
zabbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're using it how it's been used for years in the skeptics community to smear alternative ideas.

I don't believe all conspiracy theories, and quacks do need to be called out as quacks - but in the same way people call conservatives "alt-right" or far-right to scare people away from legitimate debate - members of the scientific community have consistently used "debunked" to keep people from independently reviewing verboten topics.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not questioning or calling them out for how they use the word, I'm just pointing out why. That's more important.

1
zabbers 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not questioning your observation, just finding a good comment to attach my comment to. :)