676
Comments (6)
sorted by:
3
Mrs_Fonebone 3 points ago +3 / -0

They always attack the SOURCE, never the information. Because that's what you do when you know it's true.

2
Posthumos1 2 points ago +2 / -0

I watched all of the "impeachment" testimony digging that fiasco.

Does anyone else recall that every single witness, including ALL of the "star witnesses", was directly asked if they saw, heard, knew of, or heard of ANYONE who saw, heard of, knew of, or had any direct knowledge of President Donald Trump committing ANY crime. Not a single witness, not one, testified in the affirmative. No one EVER saw or heard, or even heard of, Trump committing ANY crime. All in the record.

2
4moreyears [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're 100% correct. I bring this up any time some anti-Trump idiot brings up Russia. "Name one person who testified under oath they saw evidence of collusion with Russia. Not someone who said it on the news, but under oath. You can't name one because there are none."

People get super butthurt by this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
4moreyears [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

From what I've seen, and granted I don't follow him that closely, he calls out bullshit on both sides. The intercept other than him in 99% lefty crap it seems tho