Agreed. I thought the whole falling out between “sloppy Steve” and trump was entirely staged. Gave Bannon freedom and distance from the president to do his thing.
Plus, if you remember, Bannon was starting to have a whole bunch of media get on his ass for various things which would have acted like an anchor on Trump. It was best for both that Bannon went underground for a bit.
Remember back in August when Bannon was arrested for fraud or something? He came on Tucker & said they arrested him in an effort to stop him from helping Trump win his re-election.
I thought “fucking Bannon thinks he’s still working for the Pres while he does nothing”
He was arrested while on Miles Guo’s yacht. Miles is one of the China anti-CCP whistleblower movement & I bet you that Miles gave Bannon a copy of the hard drive.
Bannon also heard from Chinese whistleblowers in Jan that the WuFlu was spreading person to person. Bannon might be a good pet of why Trump closed the border.
This is hilarious. Another one of those things "we all knew" but didn't have confirmation of. The way he talks in the email ("Paul Ryan is an actual current client") shows how this is normal business for people like him. Guarantee he's not alone. The pollsters all have fudged "public data" the media gets, and then "real" data only their super clients and special friends get.
He can't possibly believe the crap he spews.I actually have a degree in journalism. Never worked as one though.I have a real job😉If I had a year I would like to analyse how much of the 'news' is opinion and how much is reporting on someone else's opinion.Also how accurate the analyst's predictions are.Then take a look at how much of what is considered 'news' actually correlates with the public's real.concerns and interests.
I was going to go into journalism and then I chose a technical career. 😉 One of the best classes during my brief foray was a communications class, which taught me to critically analyze media.
What is the author/anchor saying? What AREN’T they saying?
If there are photos of people, are they flattering or unflattering? Why were these particular photos used?
If there are sources, are they named?
Is the author/anchor stating actual facts, or simply presenting their opinions about an event?
Whom is funding this article/broadcast?
What is the author/anchor trying to get you to think/feel? Why?
There’s a bit more but that’s the gist of it and something I’ve been hammering home with my kids. At the end of the day, the majority of it boils down to “cui bono?”
Yes.What passes for journalism is not what I was taught.It's supposed to be fact based, properly sourced and unbiased.Opinion belongs on the editorial pages.It's also supposed to be rather varied - sports, local interest, etc...At the moment it's just celebs and political rage.My pet hate is all the "So and so says this about politician so and so's tweet" type stories.Who the hell cares.I have my own take, I dont care what a random celeb thinks.It's different if the article is " Statistician analyses the latest polls."
Exactly right Pede, it’s a complete travesty what they’ve done to actual journalism.
We share the same pet hate. Lol. Give me the facts and I’LL determine for myself how to interpret it, seeking out additional information on my own. I don’t need some hack or, worse yet, celebretard, to tell me what to think or how I should feel.
I saw him earlier today on Fox saying that Trump's election strategy is the worst his ever seen and that Trump should focus on the economy and forget about the laptop from hell. Now I understand why he was saying that....
Omg lol. This was not the gold I was expecting. When do we get Banner crying because he wasn't on the Biden Christmas card list? Or maybe Nancy threatens to bury them under her treasure trove of ice cream pints.
Now? Nothing? Then? Who knows, but more than nothing.
Funny. Luntz implies that you can pay him to say stuff: Ï declared your dad the winner of his debate against Paul Ryan even though Ryan is an actual current client". But then he didn't stay bought!!! Very dishonest.
Yep. 8 am time is printed static in the email when it was replied. So it was probably originally viewed eastern time. The 5am is a calculated time. Prob viewed in pacific time depends what the time zone of the system is doing the analysis. Looks like Frank responded about 50 mins later.
Dumbass Frank just gave a fake polling result. Exactly what you would expect from a never Trumper. He said that if pollsters get this wrong, it would be the end of his profession. The Dumbass can't even see that he's a part of the demise. TDS victims have no self awareness.
Frank Luntz is probably a pedo
Bringing down the consultant class while they're at it? Well played Bannon. I apologize for ever doubting you.
Agreed. I thought the whole falling out between “sloppy Steve” and trump was entirely staged. Gave Bannon freedom and distance from the president to do his thing.
Plus, if you remember, Bannon was starting to have a whole bunch of media get on his ass for various things which would have acted like an anchor on Trump. It was best for both that Bannon went underground for a bit.
You know someone (China or Dems) got the SDNY to try and frame Bannon for the wall hit to shut him up and it didn’t work.
And on top of that, everything they talk about they are months ahead of the news cycle.
Remember back in August when Bannon was arrested for fraud or something? He came on Tucker & said they arrested him in an effort to stop him from helping Trump win his re-election.
I thought “fucking Bannon thinks he’s still working for the Pres while he does nothing”
He was arrested while on Miles Guo’s yacht. Miles is one of the China anti-CCP whistleblower movement & I bet you that Miles gave Bannon a copy of the hard drive.
Bannon also heard from Chinese whistleblowers in Jan that the WuFlu was spreading person to person. Bannon might be a good pet of why Trump closed the border.
You sir, are correct!
This is hilarious. Another one of those things "we all knew" but didn't have confirmation of. The way he talks in the email ("Paul Ryan is an actual current client") shows how this is normal business for people like him. Guarantee he's not alone. The pollsters all have fudged "public data" the media gets, and then "real" data only their super clients and special friends get.
And Ryan the stupid shit doing business with Luntz, assuming he was an honorable gentleman.
You know what happens when we assume...??
That Eddie Munster hair lined turncoat is gonna get his.
Same. I was mad after that AL senate race, but on balance Sloppy Steve is worth his weight in gold.
So his commentary is influenced by his personal relationships rather than fact driven? How can he show his face on tv again?
This is the game folks. If you thought otherwise you were duped.
This in part explains why Trump is so hated by the media. He didn't grease the right special interests.
He’s a Liberal. No problem.
Fact driven? You realize that CNN pays a Talking Penis with Ears to host a show hilariously titled “Reliable Sources,” right? 😉
*Flaccid talking penis
Pretty sure that have to strap a back brace to him to keep him erect in the chair.
You mean a jock strap?
You’re probably right. I could’ve sworn I heard them talking about needing to strap something onto Brian, I just assumed it was a back brace. 😉
That idiot has the most slappable face ever.He is also galactically oblivious.
He’s willfully obtuse and just an overall piece of crap...which means he’s perfect for CNN.
He can't possibly believe the crap he spews.I actually have a degree in journalism. Never worked as one though.I have a real job😉If I had a year I would like to analyse how much of the 'news' is opinion and how much is reporting on someone else's opinion.Also how accurate the analyst's predictions are.Then take a look at how much of what is considered 'news' actually correlates with the public's real.concerns and interests.
I was going to go into journalism and then I chose a technical career. 😉 One of the best classes during my brief foray was a communications class, which taught me to critically analyze media.
What is the author/anchor saying? What AREN’T they saying?
If there are photos of people, are they flattering or unflattering? Why were these particular photos used?
If there are sources, are they named?
Is the author/anchor stating actual facts, or simply presenting their opinions about an event?
Whom is funding this article/broadcast?
What is the author/anchor trying to get you to think/feel? Why?
There’s a bit more but that’s the gist of it and something I’ve been hammering home with my kids. At the end of the day, the majority of it boils down to “cui bono?”
Yes.What passes for journalism is not what I was taught.It's supposed to be fact based, properly sourced and unbiased.Opinion belongs on the editorial pages.It's also supposed to be rather varied - sports, local interest, etc...At the moment it's just celebs and political rage.My pet hate is all the "So and so says this about politician so and so's tweet" type stories.Who the hell cares.I have my own take, I dont care what a random celeb thinks.It's different if the article is " Statistician analyses the latest polls."
Exactly right Pede, it’s a complete travesty what they’ve done to actual journalism.
We share the same pet hate. Lol. Give me the facts and I’LL determine for myself how to interpret it, seeking out additional information on my own. I don’t need some hack or, worse yet, celebretard, to tell me what to think or how I should feel.
I saw him earlier today on Fox saying that Trump's election strategy is the worst his ever seen and that Trump should focus on the economy and forget about the laptop from hell. Now I understand why he was saying that....
Omg lol. This was not the gold I was expecting. When do we get Banner crying because he wasn't on the Biden Christmas card list? Or maybe Nancy threatens to bury them under her treasure trove of ice cream pints.
Haha man - Lutz always struck me as a hack, nice to know I can completely ignore him now.
Frank Luntz is the dumbest motherfucker that ever lived. His family is embarrassed by him. They just keep him around for laughs.
He gets money from 2016 and he builds a replica of the Oval Office for his home. What a loon.
Can't make it up
Lick my balls and I'll lick yours. Standard Operating Procedure in DC. No wonder they're so panicked about these e-mails.
Wow what a pile of shit... Piles, both of them.
October is a blast so far.
"We may have a few more that you could confirm as well. . . ."
We need more of this light therapy.
awww you hurt muh feelz.
fat fuck
The loser called Luntz can't even put sentences together properly.
Not only starting a sentence with "Because", but an entire conversation, it is very poor grammar.
Starting a sentence with "And", it makes you wonder how the Luntz person ever got on TV and became someone of, limited, importance.
*but also
Just keeping it real.
Fuck You, Frank!
throw back to the ron paul campaign!
Luntz has a credibility issue.
What does he mean "Paul Ryan is a client"? What does Paul Ryan pay him for?
Now? Nothing? Then? Who knows, but more than nothing.
Funny. Luntz implies that you can pay him to say stuff: Ï declared your dad the winner of his debate against Paul Ryan even though Ryan is an actual current client". But then he didn't stay bought!!! Very dishonest.
He's the guy with the bad hair piece.
Just destroyed this mans whole career, in a sane world.
whats wrong with luntz face? he looks like an oversized kid
That is pretty fuckin spicy imho, this guy can never work in the field again without being called a fraud.
Never cared for the guy. Though his early work was the only stuff not completely in the bag for Democrats.
What’s up with the time stamp on this email? Archived at 5:56 am, email time stamped 8:01 am. I don’t get it.
Yep. 8 am time is printed static in the email when it was replied. So it was probably originally viewed eastern time. The 5am is a calculated time. Prob viewed in pacific time depends what the time zone of the system is doing the analysis. Looks like Frank responded about 50 mins later.
What kind of scum doesn't capitalize their brother's name?
Quick! Someone contact the FBI.
Dumbass Frank just gave a fake polling result. Exactly what you would expect from a never Trumper. He said that if pollsters get this wrong, it would be the end of his profession. The Dumbass can't even see that he's a part of the demise. TDS victims have no self awareness.