1673
posted ago by -f-b-i- ago by -f-b-i- +1673 / -0

GET IN HERE, seven hours of Maxwell testimonyright here for your viewing pleasure

https://f.maga.host/zvQ18Gb.pdf

** **

Ghislaine tried and tried to keep Epstein's secrets to herself. If anyone knows where Jeffrey Epstein’s proverbial bodies are buried, it’s Ghislaine Maxwell. Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? Maxwell spent nearly 30 years as Jeffrey Epstein’s lover, friend and accused accomplice in a wide-ranging sex-trafficking scheme that spanned years and allegedly ensnared scores of underage girls.

She became the primary target of federal investigators after Epstein’s suicide at the age of 66 inside Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center, where he was awaiting trial on sex trafficking and conspiracy charges. Prosecutors also reportedly noted Tuesday while arguing against the turnover of some materials to defense attorneys that they have not charged Maxwell with being Epstein's primary supplier of underage women, and stated that they worried she would attempt to intimidate witnesses into silence should information about potential Epstein victims be released.

“The premature revelation of this information would give the defendant the opportunity to interfere with the Government’s investigation before it is complete. Such information could allow her to contact and intimidate witnesses, destroy evidence relevant to the investigation, or alert other targets of the investigation,” the prosecutors reportedly wrote.

Her 7 hours of spilling the beans isn't staying sealed, so get in here read up and post any spicy bits here. Be prepared for the media to lie or divert. Remember if anything would damage trump it would have leaked 5 years ago.

Can't keep it quiet can ya?

== Some tunes to wake you up:

Wake me up before you gogo

Wake me up

Bring me to life

Comments (217)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
12
you_can_do_it 12 points ago +13 / -1

I mean I just read the whole thing. The redactions don't really matter. Whether we believe her or not all of her answers were explicit out right denial. She didn't budge so there was nothing important from her answers to redact (almost all redactions I read were in the questions).

To me it almost read like a movie script because there were multiple times where she had almost too well-crafted responses to be on the fly.

8
HuggableBear 8 points ago +8 / -0

I don't really know what people were expecting. The woman is the defendant in a trial for which the punishment will easily be life in prison. She's not going to just admit that she did all this stuff.

If you were on trial for murder and the prosecution asked you if you did it, are you going to just say "Yeah, I did, here are all the juicy details you need to prove it"?

If I were her I wouldn't have a said a single word. I would have had my lawyer invoke my right to remain silent and force the prosecution to prove everything.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
THELEADERSOFMEN 7 points ago +8 / -1

Well she’s a spook asset, so...

1
BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then it sounds like they had even less justification to make those redactions.