4881 () posted 176 days ago by BlueSaltMiner 176 days ago by BlueSaltMiner +4882 / -1 389 comments share 389 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (389) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 83 ▼ – bytemuncher 83 points 176 days ago +83 / -0 Looks like WSJ chickened out on running the story...doesn't matter. Cat is out of the bag! permalink save report block reply ▲ 42 ▼ – Kanxo 42 points 176 days ago +43 / -1 That’s exactly what I was thinking. Why the hell would they do that? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 31 ▼ – Pdjco658 31 points 176 days ago +35 / -4 Maybe they're still doing their homework to double check everything before they publish. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 68 ▼ – Vir4030 68 points 176 days ago +68 / -0 Yeah, because the media does that. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 32 ▼ – bugsbunny 32 points 176 days ago +38 / -6 WSJ is the best of the bunch. They're not perfect, but they do dot i's and cross t's before publishing. They'll cover it once it's iron clad, but are rarely first to the party on anything other than business news. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – Durdurdurkistan 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0 For pro-Trump stories you bet your ass they do permalink save report block reply ▲ 12 ▼ – Kanxo 12 points 176 days ago +12 / -0 Hope you’re right. Need more than just the NY Post and Brietbart to be publishing these stories. Can’t wait to see this on A19 of The NY Times. Lol. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – zakkaz1 5 points 176 days ago +5 / -0 Publish tomorrow the day of debates permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – deleted 7 points 176 days ago +7 / -0 ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 176 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – thuggishruggishtrump 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0 Swamp runs deep. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 176 days ago +2 / -0
Looks like WSJ chickened out on running the story...doesn't matter. Cat is out of the bag!
That’s exactly what I was thinking. Why the hell would they do that?
Maybe they're still doing their homework to double check everything before they publish.
Yeah, because the media does that.
WSJ is the best of the bunch. They're not perfect, but they do dot i's and cross t's before publishing. They'll cover it once it's iron clad, but are rarely first to the party on anything other than business news.
For pro-Trump stories you bet your ass they do
Hope you’re right. Need more than just the NY Post and Brietbart to be publishing these stories. Can’t wait to see this on A19 of The NY Times. Lol.
Publish tomorrow the day of debates
Swamp runs deep.