6604
() 📱 Trump Tweet 📱
posted ago by Republic2024 ago by Republic2024 +6604 / -0
Comments (402)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
148
wassupwinners 148 points ago +150 / -2

Agree. Easiest thing to do. Make interviewer sign agreement that if Trump wishes he can release his unedited version .

79
labajada 79 points ago +79 / -0

why would you need to have the interviewer sign an agreement?

87
IndelibleHippocampus 87 points ago +87 / -0

Remember this was inside the White House. Anyone entering signs a release form. I would assume there are cameras everywhere inside the WH.

50
deleted 50 points ago +51 / -1
25
ovitz 25 points ago +26 / -1

Rape joke has entered the chat.

3
mcoulton 3 points ago +3 / -0

But you cannot secretly film in bedrooms, bathrooms, or hotel rooms

7
deleted 7 points ago +13 / -6
28
heightnoise 28 points ago +28 / -0

Keep in mind that without one-party-notification being a thing, undercover journalists like Project Veritas could not do the noble work they do on a regular basis. It's far more valuable than just for creepy motherfuckers

8
Slingy 8 points ago +8 / -0

Had this happen in school this year. The guy realized this trade wasn't for him so he recorded all the audio of our class for 6 weeks on his laptop without telling anybody. He then used it against our Professor and myself when we were cutting up before class and during breaks. We're grown ass men in a trade school, of course we're going to say some things that aren't appropriate in school.

I asked a friend of mine who is a Marshal and he explained the one party two party thing to me but said if he were to have ever left the room with the laptop recording then its considered a bug and that's where he would be in trouble.

Long story short, the college refunded him his money and said bye.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-1
Loiuzein -1 points ago +1 / -2

Honestly I really don't mind voyeurism. I don't see the harm in it. That said, I don't know if there are correlations between voyeurism and escalation to harmful acts; if that's a thing then obvs fewer harmful acts please.

I'd kinda be flattered if someone would voyeur me, honestly. :>

2
JudgeWhoAllowsStuff 2 points ago +2 / -0

You sound like a Reddit fag somehow.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

They make the interviewee sign a talent release. In which they waive basically all rights.

Standard fare for anything in the entertainment industry, beware if you’re ever given one.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1