In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
The way the Democrats work is like this: "Are you stepping on my toe?" - Someone "No, you're putting your toe under my foot." - Democrat
That or something even more deranged like "No, I have my foot perched on a mostly solid mass comprised of bone and other material." or "What makes you think that toe belongs to you?"
They'll have a tendency to say I'm not doing word but I'm doing the definition of that word. For example, we're not doing socialist but we're taxing everyone and then redistributing it according to some principle which is basically the same as socialism.
Nah, this was somebody's choice. He could have had the entire flag in the "D", it's the central letter, "america is in the heart/center", he could have the flag in the B, it's the start of the letter, the image to push could be "uniting the two into one".... He could have kept the flag motif in E, but have the top be blue/stars and the other 2 red, but didn't. These are graphic designers and the fact that they chose this logo means they chose their message.
In my view this is just three red lines. We don't know the intended meaning and it could be anything. It's likely used all over the place. There's probably an insect with three red lines on its back to indicate it's poisonous. Except it's not, but it's evolved to have it because another insect has three red lines but is poisonous so it keeps the predators and other buggers away. If B had three circles instead then it would be four lines, perhaps.
The huge however is that the left want to go and make out how everything's a hate sign, everything's a Swastika, and resemblance isn't coincidental and so on so as far as I'm concerned knock yourself out, break a leg, go ahead, let rip.
Also even without this symbology we know it's basically true anyway they want to usher in some kind of unusually twisted socialist like regime. They'll just say it when asked one way or another.
The way the Democrats work is like this: "Are you stepping on my toe?" - Someone "No, you're putting your toe under my foot." - Democrat
That or something even more deranged like "No, I have my foot perched on a mostly solid mass comprised of bone and other material." or "What makes you think that toe belongs to you?"
They'll have a tendency to say I'm not doing word but I'm doing the definition of that word. For example, we're not doing socialist but we're taxing everyone and then redistributing it according to some principle which is basically the same as socialism.
Nah, this was somebody's choice. He could have had the entire flag in the "D", it's the central letter, "america is in the heart/center", he could have the flag in the B, it's the start of the letter, the image to push could be "uniting the two into one".... He could have kept the flag motif in E, but have the top be blue/stars and the other 2 red, but didn't. These are graphic designers and the fact that they chose this logo means they chose their message.
I'm mistaking the E for a B not paying attention.
China bid.
It might be deliberate but we can't know that for sure. If it's an accident then they got it bang on.
Snopes says it's false which means it's true. If it's something you can't verify the rule is if Snopes says it's true or false then it's the opposite.