Why is it not likely? Just because it feels implausible to you?
You're telling me that a presidential campaign that focus group tests everything and relies heavily on datasets built during the hillary/Obama election cycles just randomly stole their logo from a random redditor?
What makes the official narrative most likely? Do you believe everything CNN and Fox tell you as well?
Spez: I came in hot. My argument boils down to this.
-it is unlikely the official narrative is true (both in this case and as a general principle).
-it is likely an alternative is the truth. However given the number of possible alternatives and lack of complete knowledge on our part, we are unlikely to know what that actual truth is, and can only theorize.
Yeah you did lol. It's all good. yeah, I don't think its likely at all. I don't see any benefit in the redditor posting on r/legaladvice and bringing that kind of attention to the logo. A lot of ways to bring attention to it and I doubt they're first choice would be the question of copyright infringement. Just me idk. It's cool if you do though, I just don't see it.
Possible. Not likely. But possible yes.
Why is it not likely? Just because it feels implausible to you?
You're telling me that a presidential campaign that focus group tests everything and relies heavily on datasets built during the hillary/Obama election cycles just randomly stole their logo from a random redditor?
What makes the official narrative most likely? Do you believe everything CNN and Fox tell you as well?
Spez: I came in hot. My argument boils down to this. -it is unlikely the official narrative is true (both in this case and as a general principle). -it is likely an alternative is the truth. However given the number of possible alternatives and lack of complete knowledge on our part, we are unlikely to know what that actual truth is, and can only theorize.
Yeah you did lol. It's all good. yeah, I don't think its likely at all. I don't see any benefit in the redditor posting on r/legaladvice and bringing that kind of attention to the logo. A lot of ways to bring attention to it and I doubt they're first choice would be the question of copyright infringement. Just me idk. It's cool if you do though, I just don't see it.