Don’t you love how they always admit voter fraud exists but it’s never “significant” enough to them to be “widespread”. Even when case after case after case after case in state after state after state after state proves voter fraud is actually pretty damn common, they will NEVER define it as “significant” or “widespread”.
The correct response is always “how much voter fraud are you ok with then?”
Don’t you love how they always admit voter fraud exists but it’s never “significant” enough to them to be “widespread”. Even when case after case after case after case in state after state after state after state proves voter fraud is actually pretty damn common, they will NEVER define it as “significant” or “widespread”.
The correct response is always “how much voter fraud are you ok with then?”