Yes...but a lot of this was purely because Trump was the aggressor and wanted to speak far more often. Biden basically didn't say anything substantial the entire night except to struggle through answering each question coherently.
If she never interrupted Trump then he'd never stop talking and burying Biden TBH. And that's what we love about him.
Mics were only muted for the first two minutes of a primary question response. (And for a couple random seconds of Trump talking that was quickly unmuted. Dunno what that was)
idk how this site keeps saying she was good. Better than Chris Wallace, sure but I don't know how we can honestly say good.
When Trump stopped to say she was doing a good job I was very surprised because she kept talking over him but not Biden, yet I guess this IS the most fair debate moderator Trump has ever had which is SAD!!!
It was by far the best we could have hoped for from a liberal moderator. She helped Joe a little bit but it wasn't the full 1 vs 2 like we expected. It allowed Trump to shine since he didn't have to argue with 2 people.
Tbh, Trump would have just kept talking until she stopped him. That’s a debate strategy, monopolize the time and the audience will ‘assume’you won the debate, regardless of content. She was appropriate with her interruptions to end his points. Would like to see the final ‘time speaking’ tally on this debate.
Yeah and I don't know how people can say she was that bad. Compared to virtually the entirety of the media in terms of their treatment of Trump, she gave him the 5 star experience with a happy ending. I know "the bar is low". That's life. Get with the program...
Nah I wont pretend that a moderator should be neutral. She cut off trump dozens of times, outside his 2 minutes he was constantly talking over her to get a word out yet she would then turn to Biden and say "would you like to respond?" and be quiet.
Overly biased moderators is not a program I will ever "get with" and it's a problem to normalize it. Sure if it swung slightly left then another time right we could understand it's just because people are human but are trying, no it's ALWAYS leftists who moderate debates and that needs to change.
she wasn't good like a truly neutral or patriotic moderator would be, but she was outstanding relative to what we expect from these hostile media scumbags.
Nah she kept talking over trump then give biden unlimited response time ('mr president you have 10 seconds... joe you may respond')
She also muted the president twice, well someone did and Biden zero. I'm not sure his mic was ever muted.
I did see at one point he said "not true" while the president was speaking and it didn't pick up on the mic, but that was it.
Yes...but a lot of this was purely because Trump was the aggressor and wanted to speak far more often. Biden basically didn't say anything substantial the entire night except to struggle through answering each question coherently.
If she never interrupted Trump then he'd never stop talking and burying Biden TBH. And that's what we love about him.
I think we can definitely agree, she did better than Chris Matthews. Not that it was a high bar
I don't know, the few times I heard Biden interrupt was really obnoxious. His mic should have been muted when it wasn't his time.
Mics were only muted for the first two minutes of a primary question response. (And for a couple random seconds of Trump talking that was quickly unmuted. Dunno what that was)
so, yes, she was just there to protect Biden then.
Anyone with a million dollars to contribute can contribute $47 20,000 times. The “average donation” is then $47.
I didn't really get why that was relevant or what he was referring to.
Way better than Chris Wallace. She was passive aggressive on her attacks on POTUS. Where as Chris Wallace was overtly helping Biden.
Exactly. She never talked over Joe, but constantly spoke over the President. Very disrespectful.
idk how this site keeps saying she was good. Better than Chris Wallace, sure but I don't know how we can honestly say good.
When Trump stopped to say she was doing a good job I was very surprised because she kept talking over him but not Biden, yet I guess this IS the most fair debate moderator Trump has ever had which is SAD!!!
It was by far the best we could have hoped for from a liberal moderator. She helped Joe a little bit but it wasn't the full 1 vs 2 like we expected. It allowed Trump to shine since he didn't have to argue with 2 people.
Tbh, Trump would have just kept talking until she stopped him. That’s a debate strategy, monopolize the time and the audience will ‘assume’you won the debate, regardless of content. She was appropriate with her interruptions to end his points. Would like to see the final ‘time speaking’ tally on this debate.
Yeah and I don't know how people can say she was that bad. Compared to virtually the entirety of the media in terms of their treatment of Trump, she gave him the 5 star experience with a happy ending. I know "the bar is low". That's life. Get with the program...
Nah I wont pretend that a moderator should be neutral. She cut off trump dozens of times, outside his 2 minutes he was constantly talking over her to get a word out yet she would then turn to Biden and say "would you like to respond?" and be quiet.
Overly biased moderators is not a program I will ever "get with" and it's a problem to normalize it. Sure if it swung slightly left then another time right we could understand it's just because people are human but are trying, no it's ALWAYS leftists who moderate debates and that needs to change.
she wasn't good like a truly neutral or patriotic moderator would be, but she was outstanding relative to what we expect from these hostile media scumbags.
they probably see the writing in the wall tbh
low bar, very low.
The bar is so low that anything north of downright despicable is now "good" lol
nipples protruding
I liked
Moderator: Would you like to respond to that?
Joe: No.
great moment lol Joe just taking the fat L on the chin
You're not wrong, but compared to Chris Wallace she was a huge improvement.