1149
Comments (45)
sorted by:
73
IndelibleHippocampus 73 points ago +73 / -0

What if I told you there wouldn't have been a Covid-19 under a Hillary administration? There wouldn't have been a need.

Instead what we would have had was a lot more war against countries that would have had the audacity to stand up against the globalists.

Come to think of it, we probably would have had both, as C-19 serves the purpose of quelling dissent.

25
ca18det 25 points ago +25 / -0

C-19 is the gateway to The Great Reset. Look at how it's being used worldwide to usher in global governance and the NWO fuedal state they want for humanity.

11
AnEndgamePawn 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep and the USA wouldn't have survived covid-19 combined with a Clinton administration. Weak economy, millions more illegal immigrants jamming up the health industry, weak response to riots and anarchists, even bigger crackdowns on dissent from corporate media.

It would've been over. And that was probably by design

10
ca18det 10 points ago +10 / -0

We would have been subjected to constant "white nationalist" shootings and terror events carried out until they beat the average normie into supporting a semi-auto ban.

2
EasyFlowElbow 2 points ago +2 / -0

We have to BUILD BACK BETTER ya'll

16
Lady_Stallion 16 points ago +16 / -0

damn we have a hive mind around here. came in to say EXACTLY the same thing as all three current comments do

13
georock 13 points ago +13 / -0

Covid wasn't to remove trump, its for a global reset into socialism

3
Jimmy_Russler 3 points ago +3 / -0

100% this. They call it "the great reset" and openly talk about it.

Its not "socialism", its communism. You guys need to get it right. They want far-left authoritarianism, not higher taxes.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
highmoves 5 points ago +5 / -0

This. Manufactured scare tactic, kill the economy, riots, mass mail in voting to commit fraud. None of these would have happened if we would have made their choice to continue the further decline of this country while they enrich themselves. Covid would have been a seasonal flu or H1N1.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
32
Tip-O-Matic 32 points ago +32 / -0

There would have been no lockdowns under any Dem. administration. There were 2 major virus events under Obama, with no restrictions, no lockdowns, very little scare factor or fear mongering.

All this has been political from day 1 to try and make a terrific President look bad, and I believe it has backfired on the Dems royally.

14
TakingCoatsWIN 14 points ago +14 / -0

Lockdowns are the perfect way to bring about communism by instantly destroying the economy and having complete control of the population. Lockdowns would have happened worse, just not months before an election.

7
unique_string 7 points ago +9 / -2

Those "epidemics" during the Obama years were all fake. The CDC did those older psyops in order to have the opportunity to set up this big one.

7
DarkMemeDuck 7 points ago +7 / -0

So much this. We saw exactly what would happen if Hillary was prez during a pandemic in Obama. The news would hardly talk about it. Or if they did, it would be in passing with the implication that "Hillary has it under control. Don't worry about it."

14
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 14 points ago +14 / -0

If Clinton was President the left along with the aid of China never would have released the virus.

9
WhiteTrashJesus 9 points ago +9 / -0

That's assuming there would've been a "pandemic" under Hillary. Either China would've never had to release it or it would've been a minor story lke swine flu. Or they would've done the same virus in 2017 and declared martial law then had a fake ww3 and abolish the constitution.

9
humped2424 9 points ago +9 / -0

Just look at Australia and New Zealand that’s what the USA would of been complete lockdown

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
befehlistbefehl 4 points ago +4 / -0

It still looks like we're gonna have to spill blood in the streets to avoid being chipped ("vaccinated").

7
Generic 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not specific to Hillary, but I've had the thought that the dems thought trump would shut down the country so they took that stance, that he's doing too much.

when trump didn't shut down the country, the dems had to completely 180 on their stance, and say trump didn't do enough.

3
DarkMemeDuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

That does explain why they were out pushing the idea that we should all go to Chinatown, not wear masks, and be as public as possible.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Data 5 points ago +5 / -0

Something far worse and more apocalyptic would have taken place under Clinton. My feeling is that it was meant to be a war with Russia. Deep state was teeing up Russia to be the next big boogeyman throughout the Obama administration and especially with Clinton as SoS. Meanwhile she was selling our nation's uranium reserves to the Kremlin.

They still leaned heavily on Russia over the first Trump term but, lacking the political capital to wage an actual war with them, had to pivot to an interference/hacking/collusion narrative instead.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
Redpillhope 5 points ago +5 / -0

There would not have been a covid hoax under Hillary. This whole thing is just another attempt to get rid of Trump.

4
ChicagoMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nothing would have happened if Clinton was a president. The masks and lockdowns are the last ditch effort of the politicians and influencers with terminal Trump Derangement Syndrome to try to oust him out of office.

4
xBigCoffinHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

This would have been treated like H1N1 under Clinton. Media would barely talk about it.

3
td2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

What everyone else is saying. Even if the virus wasn't released by China and it came to the U.S., a clinton administration and their goons at the CDC would have just made sure that only the deaths caused solely by covid (which as of a month or so ago were less than 10,000) would be reported. And, it wouldn't see near the media coverage it has under Trump.

3
RockapulcoRedpill 3 points ago +3 / -0

I entirely disagree. I dont think any of this would have happened under clinton. I think we would have had an "unusually bad flu season," and that would be the end of it.

2
necrosexy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine the Fauci love letters -- actually, don't.

2
FedTalks 2 points ago +2 / -0

There never would have been a pandemic under Clinton. The only reason that this race is competitive is because of coronavirus. The lockdowns, the economic suicide and recession, the exaggerated case numbers are all to hurt Trump.

2
SAW2TH 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Chinese virus would never have happened because the media would not have wanted to hurt a Clinton economy in an election year.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
sickofaltspin 2 points ago +2 / -0

There would not be any.

2
The_P3P 2 points ago +2 / -0

I want to say that there wouldn't have been a covid-19 pandemic. Now that I'm thinking about it there would totally have been one. The catch would be under her administration there wouldn't be an actual virus. Also it would of happened 2 years prior to the re-election. For a year and a half everyone would have been mandated to stay indoors. Only allowed to get food at specific times according to your house/apt number being odd or even. Deniers would be hunted, homeless would be in "concentration covid camps" for your safety. To top it off 3-6 months before the election a plecebo vaccine that's 100% effective would require you to be chipped. The female president that saved the world. I'm stoned.

2
Giraffecopter 2 points ago +2 / -0

We wouldn’t have had them because the media would downplay the virus to make Hillary look good

2
morningpancakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who says there wouldve been a Covid outbreak if Clinton won?

2
Zude 2 points ago +2 / -0

I get your point but man it couldn’t be much worse and they’re not by any means done yet!

1
Intense_peacefulness 1 point ago +1 / -0

I imagine they would purposely hide it, forbid testing and research, and forbid any mention of it by state controlled media. Or alternatively say a YouTube video did it.

1
incogneato 1 point ago +1 / -0

there would have been no lockdowns under a Killary administration. There would have been no need for them.

1
mack 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would have been played off as a bad flu, no massive testing, no daily reports on positive cases or deaths. Of the reported Covid deaths total reported today because of a stricter definition of Covid death attribution we woud be looking at maybe 40 to 60 thousand reported deaths. Administration praised for preventing a panic and a possible vaccine is a couple of years maybe.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0