It's a very short article with few hyperlinks. The only explaination is Biden's logo.
Good job bringing attention to it! They haven't started censoring trending on Wikipedia it seems.
Comments (5)
sorted by:
It's a very short article with few hyperlinks. The only explaination is Biden's logo.
Good job bringing attention to it! They haven't started censoring trending on Wikipedia it seems.
Wikipedia became very reliable around 2005 or so as long as you knew how to look at citations. By 2013 corporations had been using it as a PR board with cases of paying editors. By 2015 it was a full on pay for play with many editors making a lot of money accepting money to put companies in good light. For a couple years now, it has been incredibly left wing biased with suppression of facts on political matters. In articles with tons of 'scrutiny' the sentences that are supposed to be descriptive of the source can sometimes be about as misleading as a CNN headline or a SNOPES declaration.
Here is a good tailer. Unrelated but it documents what will happen with a Biden win https://thedonald.win/p/11PVfmt2Np/
Please clap
Please clap...again
A major flag/log/indication of Socialism....
and note ANTIFA uses 3 red 'down arrows' on there shields....
hmm sounds like one of thise dogwhistles biden was talking about lol