Just listen to the inventor's own words about the PCR process. He stated that it is dangerous because it can be used specifically to give false positives. The FDA set the number cycles for it. That means they can ramp up and down the number of cycles to increase the number of positive results. 45 cycles is known to be "very accurate" but also give false positives which does not even come close to an infection. The inventor said everybody has something in them, a molecule even, and amplify it to be detectable. The FDA can change the number cycles to give more positive results. People are getting a little to freethinking? Up the cycles. Make more news reports about surges. Bam. More lockdowns. The instant they started to use case numbers instead of hospitalizations or deaths you should know it's all bogus.
California even started using a Health Equity Metric for determining when to open up counties. That's right, they are using the poor and "disadvantaged" communities as catch points to avoid having to open up the economy. If poor communities are getting higher than general pop positivity rates then the rest of the county can't open. This is senseless and evil.
Just listen to the inventor's own words about the PCR process. He stated that it is dangerous because it can be used specifically to give false positives. The FDA set the number cycles for it. That means they can ramp up and down the number of cycles to increase the number of positive results. 45 cycles is known to be "very accurate" but also give false positives which does not even come close to an infection. The inventor said everybody has something in them, a molecule even, and amplify it to be detectable. The FDA can change the number cycles to give more positive results. People are getting a little to freethinking? Up the cycles. Make more news reports about surges. Bam. More lockdowns. The instant they started to use case numbers instead of hospitalizations or deaths you should know it's all bogus.
California even started using a Health Equity Metric for determining when to open up counties. That's right, they are using the poor and "disadvantaged" communities as catch points to avoid having to open up the economy. If poor communities are getting higher than general pop positivity rates then the rest of the county can't open. This is senseless and evil.