Essentially there's a way to screw with people who try to defend this shit. Instead of saying exactly how it is, say it slightly off. Here are some examples:
Off-kilter: 40% of trans people kill themselves
Actual information: 40% of trans people attempt suicide
You see this is extremely hard to counter but their argument that it's just attempting isn't much better. It 4D chesses them. They have to admit it's bad but not what it seems.
Off-kilter: Hunter Biden was caught in a video balls deep in a teenage prostitute smoking crack
Actual information: The prostitute was most likely 18+ but asians are very thin and short, it shrouds disbelief and then they have to admit it exists to lessen the already very heavy blow. It makes you think she might have actually been teenage.
Using information such as this we can spread like wildfire and libtards have to admit all their faults. It's a beautiful 4D tactic. Is it underhanded? Of course but the election is at stake.
This is a common tactic for interviews. You make a statement that is slightly off and the person will correct you. It’s more effective than asking the question directly. For instance, “you make $1 million a year, right?” “No! I make $2 million!”
Much more effective than asking “can you confirm you make $2 million a year?” “No comment.”