202
Comments (49)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
5
Scuffers 5 points ago +12 / -7

you say that, but so long as the GOP hold the senate with ~58+ seats, would you really miss the old cunt?

we all know he's a spinless RINO at heart..

18
mateus [S] 18 points ago +19 / -1

Someone's not been paying attention. Trump needs all the senate votes he can get.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

And Miss Lindsay’s comittee needs a new chairman.

1
Scuffers 1 point ago +7 / -6

not arguing that, but consider how flakey the cunt is, so long as Trump has a clear majority, fuck him

11
mateus [S] 11 points ago +12 / -1

He's always been flaky. And didn't Trump call him the "dumbest" something-or-other in 2016? But Trump has endorsed him now (another reason it'll look bad if he loses).

He needs to win.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
8
deleted 8 points ago +10 / -2
2
peterstrzoked 2 points ago +2 / -0

Judges is definitely a benefit that would have not happened without the Trump administration, but the only reason Grahamnasty did it is because Lord Turtle willed it.

These people are fucking snakes; but they need to be PRIMARIED, not left to lose in the general.

To put it in perspective; if Trump is 1000% MAGA: Grenell is 500% MAGA Ratcliffe appears to be 250% MAGA Various assorted congressmen and senators who *seem to be based would be in the 100% range.

McConnell is 10% MAGA, and Graham is also 10% MAGA because McConnell allows him to be.

Same goes for Burr, Rubio, etc etc

Then any democrat is -10000000%, at best.

Fucking get out and vote for Ms Lindsey, we will deal with his limp wristed ass later.

And by later, I don’t mean in 6 years - we should be able to get him arrested before that, but for now we need him.

3
mateus [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Graham WAS "PRIMARIED." Three Republicans ran against him. Six years ago, five or six Republicans ran against him.

Hence, my question: What is wrong with [the people of] South Carolina?

2
peterstrzoked 2 points ago +2 / -0

Having primary challengers is not the same thing as being primaried (like Eric Cantor was PRIMARIED) but I’m not trying to be obtuse or argue semantics with you.

To answer your question, the problem is the same problem with all these voters who keep re-electing these turds (Graham isn’t the only one, the majority of Republican congressmen and almost all of the senate are turds); “BuT mY gUY iS oNE of ThE GoOD gUyS!”

Conservative voters are like battered spouses - they take the lies, betrayals, and abuse for five years and then when election time comes the turd (in this case Grahamnasty) puts out a few ads, does a few hannity interviews, call their Republican primary opponents socialists, and they get re-elected.

We need to figure out a way to break the cycle. I personally will not vote for an incumbent Republican in any primary (I did break that rule to vote for Trump), no matter how good I think ‘my guy’ might be; but more people need to vote that way.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

And there’s Throngs of actual republicans who will do better after Miss Lindsay is gone.

2
mateus [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

For the love of Mike, voters in SC aren't electing anyone who'll "do better." Between this and his last run, voters rejected NINE other Republicans.

I repeat, What is wrong with SC? That happens to be the subject of this thread.

2
Spez_Isacuck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not talking about SC, I’m talking ablut the Senate comittee that Miss Lindsay chairs. If he loses, we can replace his RINO ass with somebody who can MAGA.

0
Scuffers 0 points ago +1 / -1

so fucking what?

that's about all he has done, and look what a pigs ear he made of the Kavignar hearings...

outside of this, name a single thing the committee under him has achieved?

name the sopena's he's issued?

0
deleted 0 points ago +5 / -5