So just a gut check here. After reading their terms, they only verify and do not share the passport or license with any third party. It also seems to be encrypted and they commit to you not being identifiable to anyone by your name or info. This is reasonable security verification that you are who you say you are and should not be able to be doxxed unless you choose to put out some kind of personally identifiable information. If they change their terms then that could be trouble, but there are other existing laws regarding the sharing of your passport or license. This does not appear to be a changeable term as well. Think of what this means. You can verify and know in public that the person is real and not a bot. You can still be anonymous and not doxable. You can still maintain anonymous to parlar accounts who don’t have as much weight and say things truly anonymous. Yes you need a phone number, but you can always get a temp one with bitcoin or such. But why? You have your full freedom of speech with very reasonable protections. What this does is allow you to know that the person commenting is real but not necessarily who they are so you cant dox them. This has the potential to give actual citizens in a location or verified people in a location more weight in a conversation about an issue at that location. This is very much inline with the principles of our constitution. The question is do you want to participate with those discussions or do you “feel” a need to dur hur anonymously. Most people here at the Donald have a majority of self regulators and principals that bind us together. Despite the shills that come onto this site and “brigade” anonymously and can cause pockets of purposeful disinfo. Parlar is going for a reasonable compromise to produce quality conversations. It’s a very rational balance of giving the public the fact that you are real and not a bot, but not providing info that would by default doc you. It’s just like going out on a street corner where people can see you are real, but they don’t necessarily know who you are. Not the best analogy, but you can rizn the point. Again just another perspective. Like all things you have a choice what you are willing to accept. Personally it appears reasonable. Also for more security you could install qubes os and create disposable vms that you can funnel through vpns and tor.
So just a gut check here. After reading their terms, they only verify and do not share the passport or license with any third party. It also seems to be encrypted and they commit to you not being identifiable to anyone by your name or info. This is reasonable security verification that you are who you say you are and should not be able to be doxxed unless you choose to put out some kind of personally identifiable information. If they change their terms then that could be trouble, but there are other existing laws regarding the sharing of your passport or license. This does not appear to be a changeable term as well. Think of what this means. You can verify and know in public that the person is real and not a bot. You can still be anonymous and not doxable. You can still maintain anonymous to parlar accounts who don’t have as much weight and say things truly anonymous. Yes you need a phone number, but you can always get a temp one with bitcoin or such. But why? You have your full freedom of speech with very reasonable protections. What this does is allow you to know that the person commenting is real but not necessarily who they are so you cant dox them. This has the potential to give actual citizens in a location or verified people in a location more weight in a conversation about an issue at that location. This is very much inline with the principles of our constitution. The question is do you want to participate with those discussions or do you “feel” a need to dur hur anonymously. Most people here at the Donald have a majority of self regulators and principals that bind us together. Despite the shills that come onto this site and “brigade” anonymously and can cause pockets of purposeful disinfo. Parlar is going for a reasonable compromise to produce quality conversations. It’s a very rational balance of giving the public the fact that you are real and not a bot, but not providing info that would by default doc you. It’s just like going out on a street corner where people can see you are real, but they don’t necessarily know who you are. Not the best analogy, but you can rizn the point. Again just another perspective. Like all things you have a choice what you are willing to accept. Personally it appears reasonable. Also for more security you could install qubes os and create disposable vms that you can funnel through vpns and tor.