I'd be disappointed if we've genuinely got to the point where 46% of people;
who likely will never earn this much in their life, aren't even considering that it is more likely that he knew about it.
If your son started to acquire vast sums of wealth and you didn't know what he was doing that allowed him to acquire said wealth, that's one thing.
If your son kept insisting that you meet more and more people; that he consistntly had new guests, that is another thing.
If you've gone on tape saying you had a prosecutor fired for looking into a company for which your son worked for, that is yet another.
And if your son worked for said company at an absurd salary without any of the qualifications, that is yet another.
Logic is determining the most realistic option/outcome based on the resources available. If you aren't considering that it is 'more likely than not that he was involved' then provide some reasoning why it is less likely.
I doubt you have a compelling argument.
I'd be disappointed if we've genuinely got to the point where 46% of people; who likely will never earn this much in their life, aren't even considering that it is more likely that he knew about it.
If your son started to acquire vast sums of wealth and you didn't know what he was doing that allowed him to acquire said wealth, that's one thing.
If your son kept insisting that you meet more and more people; that he consistntly had new guests, that is another thing.
If you've gone on tape saying you had a prosecutor fired for looking into a company for which your son worked for, that is yet another.
And if your son worked for said company at an absurd salary without any of the qualifications, that is yet another.
Logic is determining the most realistic option/outcome based on the resources available. If you aren't considering that it is 'more likely than not that he was involved' then provide some reasoning why it is less likely. I doubt you have a compelling argument.