7971
posted ago by Shadowman3001 [M] ago by Shadowman3001 +7972 / -1

Permastickied until the election

We think nationally a lot, but let's talk local for a bit!

Rules for this thread are pretty simple. Top-level posts must be structured as such or they'll be deleted:

[STATE]

[COUNTY/CITY/etc (if applicable)]

[Position title. School board, police chief, dog catcher, tax hike, etc.]: -Who is the MAGA candidate(s), or Yes/No to the initiative. Please include an explanation (and link, if possible)

Example:


NORTH DAKOTA

FARGO COUNTY

Police Chief:

-Deputy Dangle. He puts rollerskating hookers away and doesn't afraid of anything

School tax increase

-Vote NO. They're failing our students, churning out rollerskating hookers. They'll use the money for rayciss training anyway.


If you're looking for advice for your state/county, ctrl-F and search for it. If nothing comes up, do some research and advise others!

Comments (1931)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
7
missusellis 7 points ago +7 / -0

FLORIDA DUVAL

Amendments:

1.) Citizen Requirement - YES

2.) Minimum Wage - NO

3.) Open Primary - NO

4.) Constitutional Amendments - NO

  1. Homestead Limitation - YES

6.) Veteran Spouse - NO (Vets - yes. Spouse - save my taxes)

Duval County School Surtax - NO

JEA Charter - NO

Congress: House - John Rutherford

State: FL Supreme Court - Carlos Muñiz

State House - Jason Fischer

Duval County: Soil Water Grp 2 - Binod Kumar Soil Water Grp 4 - Arthur Bides

Clerk of Courts - Jody Phillips

Florida Courts: Keep incumbents

Duval Courts: Keep incumbents

2
hoopinfloyd 2 points ago +2 / -0

I voted similarly except:

4 - yes , because fuck this whole petition amendments bullshit, we have legislators for a reason. This will limit/dissuade shit like open primaries coming to ballots.

6 - yes , cuz fuck all taxes and might as well help grieving vet spouses from extra financial hardship.

Judges I said yes to all except Joseph Lewis since he was appointed by RINO Jeb. I always find judges hard to get info on.

1
JuicyfearsMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judges are hard to get info on, which is why I lean toward no, but it's a good bit of info on Lewis you've provided, a no vote for him drains the swamp if he was a Bush appointee

6
TychoDurandal 6 points ago +6 / -0

What are you putting for President and Vice President? I wanna make sure I do it right

2
Smubbs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pete bootygeg and kumallah

9
JuicyfearsMAGA 9 points ago +10 / -1

I agree with most of this but I am voting yes for amendment 4, I think because so many amendments are activist in nature, they should have to pass through 2 election cycles. Couple this with that many many people simply check yes for everything, it gives time to make people aware of the dangers and consequences of certain things passing. Further, it ensures things aren't going to pass on a whim and just have some semblance of longer term support.

1
Bbme19 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I thought that made sense as well, when I read it. I'll look down this list for any further comments about #4. I'm hoping to go in and vote in a few hours from now.

1
foreach 1 point ago +1 / -0

This amendment is written pretty much to keep pot from getting legalized in Florida. I voted NO because I no longer wish to support the failed war on drugs.

1
JuicyfearsMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

We shouldn't be legalizing drugs through constitutional amendments, and if we're going to legalize pot, it should be easy enough to pass through the ballot twice. We do need to decriminalize possession here, and reform our drug policies, but an amendment isn't the place to do it, in my opinion.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0