7971
posted ago by Shadowman3001 [M] ago by Shadowman3001 +7972 / -1

Permastickied until the election

We think nationally a lot, but let's talk local for a bit!

Rules for this thread are pretty simple. Top-level posts must be structured as such or they'll be deleted:

[STATE]

[COUNTY/CITY/etc (if applicable)]

[Position title. School board, police chief, dog catcher, tax hike, etc.]: -Who is the MAGA candidate(s), or Yes/No to the initiative. Please include an explanation (and link, if possible)

Example:


NORTH DAKOTA

FARGO COUNTY

Police Chief:

-Deputy Dangle. He puts rollerskating hookers away and doesn't afraid of anything

School tax increase

-Vote NO. They're failing our students, churning out rollerskating hookers. They'll use the money for rayciss training anyway.


If you're looking for advice for your state/county, ctrl-F and search for it. If nothing comes up, do some research and advise others!

Comments (1931)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
a_farmer 10 points ago +10 / -0

WASHINGTON
KING COUNTY

Vote NO on AT LEAST Charter Amendments number 5 and 6. Voting in favor of either of these amendments would take away power from the sheriff, who is the voter's say in law enforcement. Amendment 5 would make the sheriff an appointed position and Amendment 6 would strip discretion from the sheriff and county. Not good.

Really, all of the Charter Amendments are solid No's. Number 1 isn't bad in theory but it is going to give bureaucrats even more power over the police. Number 2 is horrible - it lets the county sell property for under market value in order to raise funds for homeless programs. Number 3 changes "Citizen" to "public / member of public / resident" within a lot of the charter. Number 4 is supported by Nikita Oliver (who is one of the crazier politicians in the area). Number 7 is fairly benign.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0