24
Comments (15)
sorted by:
6
wumao 6 points ago +6 / -0

Voter fraud

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

If we're including PA now, Biden has NO path to victory whatsoever.

1
Aeropro [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

If Biden takes PA, all bets are off. Trump would need to peel away Maine or New Hampshire plus take either Minnesota, Michigan, or Wisconsin.

2
essenceofsalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Arizona and Michigan would be plenty to win without PA

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
anenzymaticboom 3 points ago +3 / -0

You sir are correct!

3
South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

And Idaho is Kamala's catch phrase

1
PeteButtplug 1 point ago +1 / -0

We SHOULD be red, but Milwaukee 'found' 30,000 votes that pushed Evers into office last election. I'm not convinced they won't try similar bullshit this year.

2
Thingthing22 2 points ago +2 / -0

He loses one of the toss-ups.

2
irspow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump would have to lose a combination of states totaling 28 electoral votes that he previously had in 2016 to lose this election. I am pretty certain that if he holds Florida he wins.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Rmaga7 2 points ago +2 / -0

PA is huge

2
dontreadonme 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think they have to fell pretty good. Even a strong chance he could lose PA and win AZ and WI and the one district in New England or Maine and get 270

1
Aeropro [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link to interactive map: https://www.270towin.com/

Biden would need to sweep Arizona, Wisconsin, Michigan, Minnesota, and New Hampshire.

I can see him taking up to three of those five (Minnesota, New Hampshire, and Michigan), and maybe even Wisconsin.

But, he'd still lose. There's a good chance Trump actually takes 4 out of those 5 or all of them (probably not Minnesota).

Biden has got to hope to Christ that he somehow peels away NC and then wins 4 out of those 5, otherwise he still loses.