7196
Comments (222)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
18
ChinaVirusBigly 18 points ago +20 / -2

I really liked her as a moderator overall though, I think that was the least biased reporter I've seen in any debates/interviews with Trump. The lady in the town hall interviewing Trump was an absolute disgrace in comparison.

18
Vivadiscordia 18 points ago +18 / -0

The problem is less her, and more the debates in general. Every single question comes from a leftist slant, amounting to, “Here’s why you are wrong, what do you have to say?”

8
MerlynTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

They should do tele-townhalls instead. Let voters call in and ask the questions.

8
Vivadiscordia 8 points ago +8 / -0

Doesn’t really solve the issue that callers could be pre-screened ahead of time to create the image of an overwhelmingly high number of negative callers for a specific candidate.

3
MerlynTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good point.

1
GorillaWarfare 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like many problems with corporate media, there's not a good solution other than to burn corporate journalism to the ground and keep the pain on until they as a group regain honor and integrity and learn to act as information spreaders and not opinion manipulators. You can't fix it with rules when the problem is the dishonest nature of the people running the show.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
FOUR_MORE_TERMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

The topics themselves were trash. Fucking climate change and I swear half the debate was about race. And "500 kids separated from their parents". Wtf. Even if completely true, that's less than a rounding error. Garbage shit. Nothing of importance talked about. And the 500 kids was a lie, unsurprisingly.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, she wasn’t too bad all things considered. I think the debate format helped a lot too. GEOTUS knocked it out of the park.