3807 () posted 173 days ago by BlueSaltMiner 173 days ago by BlueSaltMiner +3807 / -0 83 comments share 83 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (83) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 39 ▼ – deleted 39 points 173 days ago +39 / -0 ▲ 20 ▼ – CmonGubMintGibMe 20 points 173 days ago +20 / -0 Didn't they just rule 4-4 for this same thing in PA? Or was that something different? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 12 ▼ – Pepe 12 points 173 days ago +12 / -0 I have the same question permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 33 ▼ – chuckachookah 33 points 173 days ago +33 / -0 I think that sent it back to rest on the prior ruling BUT the appeal can be re-heard by the Supreme Court, which NOW had 9 justices. A 5-4 and BTFO for the Unlawful Pennsylvania extension ruling incoming. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 23 ▼ – mixednuts86 23 points 173 days ago +23 / -0 Man. Trump knows how to fucking WIN. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 18 ▼ – spezisacuckold 18 points 173 days ago +18 / -0 It needs to be emergency filed and heard within the next week. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 8 ▼ – PinochetIsMyHero 8 points 173 days ago +8 / -0 No, Roberts decided PA's shenanigans were acceptable. Pretty much the reverse of the WI decision. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 172 days ago +1 / -0
Didn't they just rule 4-4 for this same thing in PA? Or was that something different?
I have the same question
I think that sent it back to rest on the prior ruling BUT the appeal can be re-heard by the Supreme Court, which NOW had 9 justices.
A 5-4 and BTFO for the Unlawful Pennsylvania extension ruling incoming.
Man. Trump knows how to fucking WIN.
It needs to be emergency filed and heard within the next week.
No, Roberts decided PA's shenanigans were acceptable. Pretty much the reverse of the WI decision.