Africa: Tribal warfare is the result of white colonizers not respecting tribal borders and putting different tribes in close proximity. Conflict was inevitable.
what is even more annoying, those tribal conflicts are from communists stoking division in an attempt to gain as much of Africa as possible after colonialism. now that Africa is a complete mess, they blame colonialism, not the 70+ communist revolutions....
That's what the left didn't realize when they picked Black Panther to be their champion. If they actually read the comics and actually studied the character they'd see that he is actually an African Trump and one of the more conservative superheroes in the Marvel universe. The problem is that they're fake fans and just saw "black man, black superhero, he is the bestest ever!"
To me, that was the greatest "IN YOUR FUCKING FACE" moment regarding Black Panther.
They have a wall, a big beautiful wall, they isolate, outsiders are highly vetted before coming in, they didnt care about their warmongering chucklefuck neighbors being drug off as slaves being sold by their -own people-.
When they finally reached out, it was because they were stable, and could offer help. But they got their country together first.
Need to pump those numbers up white folks! Time for another Murphy Brown series to glorify single motherhood, because the sad single mom with weirdo son detergent commercials just aren't cutting it.
Actually the doo-gooders (Democrats) made it a condition of so much public aid and public housing that the fathers couldn't be in the picture. This was done in the earliest days of the welfare state. Even if they wanted to be in the picture and try to work it would keep their family living in the slums and maybe going hungry. So they left. A whole generation of kids in the cities were raised with fathers (at best) there only part time. And thus the cycle began.
This. The next time some blue-haired chick runs her mouth about male privilege throw this in her face. If any welfare program similarly discriminated against women the outrage would never end.
The problem is that the court system and child support enforcement encourage single mothers to not get married and not hold the father financially responsible. A woman who is single and pregnant will qualify for SNAP, section 8 housing, WIC, and welfare, where a married woman with 2 incomes in the family would not qualify for any of that. So they forego getting married, they decline to identify the father, if he chips in anything voluntarily, that's an added bonus to the mother. Now, if you were married and divorced the mother of your kid(s), even if you were unemployed, the court would impute income to you based on what you should reasonably be able to obtain in the open jobs market. Whether you actually go out and earn that income isn't relevant - you're obligated by court order to pay up to support your kid based on that imputed level of income. So, my proposition is to remove the incentives for single mothers to be single mothers, or at least to forego holding fathers financially responsible for their own kids - mom didn't knock herself up, some guy clearly is responsible, so either identify that man so the court can hold him financially responsible, or impute the income a father would be contributing to the mother before determining eligibility for benefits, and then if she still refuses to identify him, the loss is entirely on her, not the taxpayers.
It's a travesty that a woman can abort or abandon the child, but the man is forced to maintain the child even if he didn't want it. Including in cases of rape.
This has to make up a significant percentage of male support for abortion. He's let off the hook for a lifetime of social and financial responsibility, and he likely rationalizes, it's HER choice, so he's off the hook for Hell.
We'll never do away with things we can't control, like hurricanes, fires and illness, but if people just lived with responsibility, we could do away with 90% of all suffering in our society.
America has largely lost any sense of responsibility or guilt or duty. We have destroyed multiple nations in my life that neither attacked us nor posed any actual threat. This is in fact one of Trump’s greatest accomplishments. He has so far resisted the drums of the war machine. He ended ISIS, but has not gone along with plans for huge bases everywhere.
Gov policy can only do so much to deal with the void left by the rejection of values, the loss of faith. Blacks and whites both had way better family formation rates in the past.
The left is culpable for much of this. Think of Barry’s mom. Grew to hate America and white men. Anything foreign excites her: she has xenophilia. First a married African communist Muslim while she’s young, then she gets a thing for guys of color across the Pacific. Drags her souvenir there and now he’s Soetero. Then she doesn’t want the souvenir so he’s back to her white parents to raise. She was just running wild and now a huge percentage of guys and girls live this way.
That's been happening long before dementia joe. you can thank LBJ for starting this process, and every democrat since then who supported the slow roll genocide/enslavement of them.
Shut up. This is why the entire Hollywood, younger generation, etc hate conservatives. Where would you like all these unaborted babies to go? Straight to foster homes? Like we don't already have hundreds of thousands of unwanted children in foster care. You know what would solve that? Let gays adopt. Or let abortion be legal. Would also help us with our population about to become out of control.
No, you cannot give a child to sexual deviants. There's a very big correlation between homos and pedos. Do you want children to be molested?
Not to mention that you cannot normalize homos as if they were a real family.
And I'm pro-choice. Libtards should be free to abort their own children.
But that has nothing to do with being a family. This is all coming from your beloved religion. I'm not super high on homos, but I'd take a gay dad over hunter biden or Joe Biden. Talk about two catholic family men. Give me a break dude.
I wish it was this simple, but it won't be. We must remain vigilant, we must keep working to sway the public. What the court did, they cant now undo. We, the people, must be the catalyst. We must undo it before they can finish the job.
I don't give a shit what the case is or what the decision is - anytime a single one of "our judges" goes against the grain, it doesn't make a fuck what they said in their opinion, they get burned at the stake around here anywhere from a few weeks to possibly forever......
Unfortunately there's a good portion of our side that wants activist judges just as bad as the left does.....
Unfortunately there's a good portion of our side that wants activist judges just as bad as the left does.....
I agree, and I agree with OP that it's not going to be simple, but at some point the activism from the other side needs to be reevaluated which would be a redress, rather than counter activism from the right.
We have reevaluated it by taking a real majority in the Supreme Court for a generation.... and you can bet your sweet ass one of the first things they'll do if we take back over the house and Trump gets reelected is make an amendment so that it stays 9 forever. Why do you think Ted Cruz already wrote it?
So now our judges have absolutely no reason to be activist judges at all....
I want them to do their fucking job well, wherever that may lead them. I understand enough about law to know that that is inevitably going to lead to some case decisions I disagree with.
Well yeah, the Supreme Court had its power (wrongfully) expanded. However, now that we have control, we should very well use that power that has been established to put things back and then hopefully reduce that power back to simply following the constitution.
The reason we even got judges confirmed is that the Senate finally recognized that it's us vs them rather then an actual genuine discussion of a candidate. Mitch McConnell decided to actually play the game rather than the game we're "supposed" to be playing. Of course it's sad and divided, but you won't resolve anything by pretending that the other side is not actively trying to destroy you and the entire country.
This meme basically sums up what Schumer said last night. Based on what he said we didn't confirm a new justice, we just appointed the high queen of the supreme court whose power cannot be questioned. Like calm the fuck down Chucky.
It does make commies mad, but unfortunately it also scares the HELL out of normies. And it's NOT a majority of Republicans that support a hard-line on abortion. Most are against the insanity of "any abortion, any time", but like it or not, most reasonable people are for up-to-first-trimester.
It's not an exaggeration to say that 30% of people are "never Republicans" solely because of the fear of the hard-line Republicans on abortion, and that directly led to the Democrats being able to institute Fascism in our country, with Communists as foot soldiers.
This. Attack abortion by pointing out the horror a 9month abortion which is legal and celebrated in NYC. If a kid is born say a day early and you murdered it the next day you would go to prison for life. But if a woman aborts the exact same kid one day before its due date - its not a problem. It's insane.
Roe v. Wade, no matter your position on abortion itself, is a shitty decision. Inventing rights out of "penumbras" and "emanations" is shitty jurisprudence, and even if for no other reason, that shitty bit of work is good reason enough to kick Roe v. Wade to the curb once and for all.
Roe started with a big lie and went up through the courts. Judges aren’t usually considered mere bureaucrats. The judiciary is one of the three branches of government and is sometimes the crucial one because how else do we want major disputes resolved?
I completely agree that Roe was a horrible decision and that it saw the Court taking over what should have been up to the people: a Constitutional Amendment.
SCOTUS needs a 14th Amendment dispute to create personhood for the preborn. If a child in the womb is considered a person, then that person has rights and cannot be willfully murdered.
The only difference between you now, and you when you were conceived, is time. To discriminate based on age is against the law. The law should protect all life from the moment of conception.
Although this is where I stand, it is also not enforceable. We can’t scan and know the moment of conception. It would be too invasive. And it would not be right to put someone in jail by force because they took a morning after pill for example. As such it would be wise to have some kind of arbitrary point where killing that unborn life is not lawful. Like age of adulthood. We can name an arbitrary point where the fetus becomes protected under the law. I’d go so far as saying, “When you first realize you are pregnant,” is the point where the life is worth protecting.
I see where you're coming from and I agree. Confirmation of pregnancy would be enough IMO, but the major qualifying factor would have to be proof of intent by actually seeking and having an abortion.
However, it is not uncommon for the child to pass in the first trimester (it's something like 90%+ survival after that). I have been pregnant 6 times, two of which were lost in the first trimester and the four others are laughing and playing together in my living room.
I am anti-Plan B/hormonal birth control based on the risk of ending life at the conception stage, but I have major doubts that they will cease to exist. The biggest impact I can make in society is living according to my beliefs!
Thank you for sharing some of your story. Yes there are so many variations and different situations. Our default should be to protect life.
Also it’s noteworthy to point out re: legality that it’s not the woman who is ‘jailed for having an abortion’ it is the doctor/person performing the murder that is breaking the law under a ‘ban’ on abortion.
Doctors should be saving and promoting life not ending it. Federal funding should not support the ending of unborn children. From there, states can decide and people can move freely to live where their values are upheld.
Agreed, but at best, the abortion decision will become a state issue, not a federal one. Not one federal dollar should be sent to murder an unborn child.
What nation seriously wants to say, “Ah, you have another person being created who can help preserve and defend this way of life for another generation; why don’t you end its life before it begins?”
I think you misread or misunderstood what I was saying.
A unique person is created at conception. It is a life worth being protected when you find out about it. Only an idiot would believe life begins at birth.
Words can have more than one meaning. When talkign about gender as the definition that was used at bathrooms, sports and etc..., the definition was gender 1) have Y chromosome and gender 2) not have y chromosome.
The people who think she just suddenly going to somehow end abortions are just as stupid as the people on the left who think she's suddenly going to somehow end their right to have those abortions.....
both extremes are absolutely retarded and apparently don't know how the Supreme Court works.
The people who think she just suddenly going to somehow end abortions are just as stupid as the people on the left who think she's suddenly going to somehow end their right to have those abortions.....
True - Roe v. Wade won't die overnight.
It can however proceed to be contained:
Require all abortion doctors to have hospital privileges at the closest hospital (like any other outpatient surgery).
Require all abortion facilities to be certified by the state hospital board (many are, but some states let that slide.)
Heartbeat laws. If there's a beating heart, you shouldn't be allowed to proceed with an abortion unless the mother's life is in provable immediate or near-immediate (within 9 months) danger from the pregnancy.
Required Informed Consent. This means listing all available adoption agencies and their contact info, all government-funded pre-natal programs, etc.
I agree with you for the most part, those who think ACB or anyone for that matter is going to completely eradicate abortion is in for a huge disappointment.
The large majority of the "opponents of abortion" will be satisfied w/ taxpayer dollars not allocated to this bullshit. If lunatic whores want to murder their own kids let them do it on their own dime or via "Philanthropy." This organization is a huge money Laundering operation for the dems where they keep funneling millions of American Taxpayers back into their own parties pockets.
Are you saying that as an opposition to this approach? Thought the issue wasn't the tactic but what was actually being targeted. It's quite simple from my perspective. You have a right to a gun. you don't have a right to an abortion.
We are obviously hitting up on differences of world view here so I don't imagine much productive will come of this, but I have a NATURAL right to bear arms. One recognized by the constitution. Any legal "right" to have an abortion is at odds with the natural order and needs to be upended using whatever means necessary to achieve correct alignment. Yes, this is my viewpoint (opinion implies subjectivity) but it is one that I believe to be objective. If I believe this, I am duty bound to defend REAL rights and obligated to protect those who are having their rights deprived (the unborn children) from the falsification of rights. If I hold this perspective, an alignment of tactics is hardly hypocrisy. It's not the lefts tactics that I find issue with here but the target of their tactics.
Let me start off by saying I fully understand where you're coming from about the potential for some truly difficult challenges. However, I'd say life begins at conception. In regards to the wave of children, man... those are human beings. Not just human beings but our countrymen, regardless of race or social class. I'd rather take the burden of figuring it out then the aborting them. The einstein thing isn't as important to me because I have love for all of them. I don't know of you're religious or not but it's an area where my understanding of the divine can't help but be the basis for my political evaluation. Life has to trump stability, comfort and economic prosperity. I also think that it doesn't have to be done in a single faceted way, however. Any effort to end abortion needs to be accompanied by efforts to rebuild families, promote virtuous child rearing, etc in order to mitigate such challenges ahead of time. What's the point of it all if not to defend and sacrifice for the beauty of life?
Dude, chill. We obviously know that she can't just end it, but there will be a time when her vote will be CRITICAL in such cases. We're just having fun. This site is a high energy machine that pumps out delicious memes from time to time. You're the dumbass for taking this literally.
What's even more key to understand is that even if Roe v Wade is overturned, it doesn't immediately make abortion illegal. What happens is that it becomes a state issue where individual states will set their own laws on it, many of which ALREADY HAVE. Abortions will still be happening and the states that are already performing abortions are going to continue to perform them.
The biggest changes that we might see out of this is changes to WHEN a abortion can happen. For example, I can see some states implementing things like heartbeat laws or 9 week laws. Things like that to limit certain aspects of abortion that previously were restricted by RvW.
Yep, exactly right. The genie isn't going back in the bottle. If blue states allow late term abortion now, they will allow it after Roe v Wade gets overturned
The only way I could see the genie going back in is if the ruling is made that children in the womb are entitled to the full rights of American citizens and as such willfully terminating the pregnancy would be depriving them of their right to life (which is true, just need SCOTUS to say that)
I think that there are a few issues that Conservatives need to "get over" if they want to have any chance of avoiding the larger issue.
Legal weed? A non-issue. Gay marriage? Non-issue.
Conservatives need to focus on the stuff that ACTUALLY is wrong like transitioning children, cancel culture, baseless accusations on social media ruining lives, economy, etc.
I agree. Don't forget pedophilia, backpedaling on civil rights (which is what California wants), crippling taxes... As long as my Church doesn't get forced to marry same-sex couples, it is a non-issue.
I personally think the destruction of the family is due to increased sex positivity or rather "have as much sex as you can, it doesn't make you a whore!", the rise of feminism, and the media's war against monogamy.
There are plenty of gay people against transitioning children. Just because there's a vocal minority doesn't mean the whole group is bad.
The insane trans people who push the transitioning children narrative more often than not do not identify as gay. They have a paraphilia of dressing like the opposite sex. I've been advocating for the "T" to be removed from the LGB(T) for a long time because it has nothing to do with sexuality.
I don't think it could really happen without there being a big re-enervated national discussion about it. I used to support abortion just because I hadn't really heard good arguments about it. Once I did, I realised the pro-life side had excellent and much better arguments. But those discussions aren't really happening, except for within groups that have already made up their mind. The result is stagnation and acceptance of what already is.
Just stop ALL federal funding, the perpetually butthurt retards won't realize that if all the idiots throwing a hissy fit each year for the woman's march just donated the amount of money they spend being a giant attention whore, PP would actually make MORE money.
It was only recently, after I've learned more about the American justice system, that I realized that Justice Amy is in fact, not our champion.
She is a champion of our forefathers.
It's a lot like how an executioner is not a murderer. It's just the pointy end of the stick.
It must take great strength to decide on something that's against your personal preference. It is up to all of us that Justice Amy does not have to deal with shitty laws written by horrible people.
I can just imagine how basketball players became increasingly more creative and athletic and finding more exploits to win a game. It was up to the commission to fine tune the rules so the game didn't turn ridiculous. The referee is not supposed to decide in favor of his favorite team.
The organization will be required to give parenting ADVICE. Two parent households work best.
All I’m sayin is that Wakanda has a wall, and their dads were around. And they all had jobs.
When you try and indoctrinate lefties but end up telling a story about how strong bordered ethnostates are a good thing.
meme related
Good template, somebody needs to do one with
Africa: Tribal warfare is the result of white colonizers not respecting tribal borders and putting different tribes in close proximity. Conflict was inevitable.
Europe: Diversity is our strenth
I think I saw something like that.
You're absolutely right, that'd be a powerful meme.
what is even more annoying, those tribal conflicts are from communists stoking division in an attempt to gain as much of Africa as possible after colonialism. now that Africa is a complete mess, they blame colonialism, not the 70+ communist revolutions....
Who knew the guys who put an AK on their flag would be prone to civl war?
That's what the left didn't realize when they picked Black Panther to be their champion. If they actually read the comics and actually studied the character they'd see that he is actually an African Trump and one of the more conservative superheroes in the Marvel universe. The problem is that they're fake fans and just saw "black man, black superhero, he is the bestest ever!"
True, but that movie ended with that nation’s leader opening his borders and giving all their technology and wealth to other countries
To me, that was the greatest "IN YOUR FUCKING FACE" moment regarding Black Panther.
They have a wall, a big beautiful wall, they isolate, outsiders are highly vetted before coming in, they didnt care about their warmongering chucklefuck neighbors being drug off as slaves being sold by their -own people-.
When they finally reached out, it was because they were stable, and could offer help. But they got their country together first.
The wall was there to keep the fathers in.
😂
Probably getting up there for white people too.
These numbers are too damned high!
These are murders. Not numbers.
The numbers are for babies that aren't aborted. 77%, 49%, and 33% of black, Hispanic, and white births are to single mothers.
::Statisticians in Dem strongholds look around nervously::
single mothers in this comment not talking about the democrat batch sacrifices to Moloch which is also too high.
Need to pump those numbers up white folks! Time for another Murphy Brown series to glorify single motherhood, because the sad single mom with weirdo son detergent commercials just aren't cutting it.
Holy fuck it's up to 77% now?
Safety nets are to be a springboard to bettering your lot in life, not permanent real estate.
Actually the doo-gooders (Democrats) made it a condition of so much public aid and public housing that the fathers couldn't be in the picture. This was done in the earliest days of the welfare state. Even if they wanted to be in the picture and try to work it would keep their family living in the slums and maybe going hungry. So they left. A whole generation of kids in the cities were raised with fathers (at best) there only part time. And thus the cycle began.
This. The next time some blue-haired chick runs her mouth about male privilege throw this in her face. If any welfare program similarly discriminated against women the outrage would never end.
The problem is that the court system and child support enforcement encourage single mothers to not get married and not hold the father financially responsible. A woman who is single and pregnant will qualify for SNAP, section 8 housing, WIC, and welfare, where a married woman with 2 incomes in the family would not qualify for any of that. So they forego getting married, they decline to identify the father, if he chips in anything voluntarily, that's an added bonus to the mother. Now, if you were married and divorced the mother of your kid(s), even if you were unemployed, the court would impute income to you based on what you should reasonably be able to obtain in the open jobs market. Whether you actually go out and earn that income isn't relevant - you're obligated by court order to pay up to support your kid based on that imputed level of income. So, my proposition is to remove the incentives for single mothers to be single mothers, or at least to forego holding fathers financially responsible for their own kids - mom didn't knock herself up, some guy clearly is responsible, so either identify that man so the court can hold him financially responsible, or impute the income a father would be contributing to the mother before determining eligibility for benefits, and then if she still refuses to identify him, the loss is entirely on her, not the taxpayers.
It's a travesty that a woman can abort or abandon the child, but the man is forced to maintain the child even if he didn't want it. Including in cases of rape.
Women have more rights than men. It's not fair.
This has to make up a significant percentage of male support for abortion. He's let off the hook for a lifetime of social and financial responsibility, and he likely rationalizes, it's HER choice, so he's off the hook for Hell.
Also left off the hook from being forced to maintain a child he doesn't see and who grows up hating him.
We'll never do away with things we can't control, like hurricanes, fires and illness, but if people just lived with responsibility, we could do away with 90% of all suffering in our society.
America has largely lost any sense of responsibility or guilt or duty. We have destroyed multiple nations in my life that neither attacked us nor posed any actual threat. This is in fact one of Trump’s greatest accomplishments. He has so far resisted the drums of the war machine. He ended ISIS, but has not gone along with plans for huge bases everywhere.
Gov policy can only do so much to deal with the void left by the rejection of values, the loss of faith. Blacks and whites both had way better family formation rates in the past.
The left is culpable for much of this. Think of Barry’s mom. Grew to hate America and white men. Anything foreign excites her: she has xenophilia. First a married African communist Muslim while she’s young, then she gets a thing for guys of color across the Pacific. Drags her souvenir there and now he’s Soetero. Then she doesn’t want the souvenir so he’s back to her white parents to raise. She was just running wild and now a huge percentage of guys and girls live this way.
That's been happening long before dementia joe. you can thank LBJ for starting this process, and every democrat since then who supported the slow roll genocide/enslavement of them.
Mother and father work best. I'd rather have a gay couple than a single parent, but mother and father work best.
Are you insane? We cannot give children in adoption to pedophiles!
Shut up. This is why the entire Hollywood, younger generation, etc hate conservatives. Where would you like all these unaborted babies to go? Straight to foster homes? Like we don't already have hundreds of thousands of unwanted children in foster care. You know what would solve that? Let gays adopt. Or let abortion be legal. Would also help us with our population about to become out of control.
No, you cannot give a child to sexual deviants. There's a very big correlation between homos and pedos. Do you want children to be molested? Not to mention that you cannot normalize homos as if they were a real family.
And I'm pro-choice. Libtards should be free to abort their own children.
Why can't they be a "real" family?
Because sex between a man and a woman has the power to create life.
Sex between a man and a man can only create a turd. Literally.
Any questions?
But that has nothing to do with being a family. This is all coming from your beloved religion. I'm not super high on homos, but I'd take a gay dad over hunter biden or Joe Biden. Talk about two catholic family men. Give me a break dude.
We're not talking about pedophiles.
Someone needs a redpill
Fair enough, can't argue with that.
An article filled with only anecdotal evidence is not really a redpill.
I found a study that showed that 35% of make homosexual had been a victim of child sexual abuse.
It's not just anecdotal.
So? That's about the same percentage as for males in general.
I wish it was this simple, but it won't be. We must remain vigilant, we must keep working to sway the public. What the court did, they cant now undo. We, the people, must be the catalyst. We must undo it before they can finish the job.
Fair, but we gotta keep the high-energy support even when things dont go our way on the court
Lol.. you must be new around here....
I don't give a shit what the case is or what the decision is - anytime a single one of "our judges" goes against the grain, it doesn't make a fuck what they said in their opinion, they get burned at the stake around here anywhere from a few weeks to possibly forever......
Unfortunately there's a good portion of our side that wants activist judges just as bad as the left does.....
I agree, and I agree with OP that it's not going to be simple, but at some point the activism from the other side needs to be reevaluated which would be a redress, rather than counter activism from the right.
We have reevaluated it by taking a real majority in the Supreme Court for a generation.... and you can bet your sweet ass one of the first things they'll do if we take back over the house and Trump gets reelected is make an amendment so that it stays 9 forever. Why do you think Ted Cruz already wrote it?
So now our judges have absolutely no reason to be activist judges at all....
I want them to do their fucking job well, wherever that may lead them. I understand enough about law to know that that is inevitably going to lead to some case decisions I disagree with.
Well yeah, the Supreme Court had its power (wrongfully) expanded. However, now that we have control, we should very well use that power that has been established to put things back and then hopefully reduce that power back to simply following the constitution.
The reason we even got judges confirmed is that the Senate finally recognized that it's us vs them rather then an actual genuine discussion of a candidate. Mitch McConnell decided to actually play the game rather than the game we're "supposed" to be playing. Of course it's sad and divided, but you won't resolve anything by pretending that the other side is not actively trying to destroy you and the entire country.
Which is exactly why Trump has picked relatively moderate judges so Democrats cant call out any hypocrisy.
We choose to meme! Not because it is easy but because it is triggering!
This meme basically sums up what Schumer said last night. Based on what he said we didn't confirm a new justice, we just appointed the high queen of the supreme court whose power cannot be questioned. Like calm the fuck down Chucky.
Anyone who doesn’t understand this is just to trigger leftists is a leftist ;)
It does make commies mad, but unfortunately it also scares the HELL out of normies. And it's NOT a majority of Republicans that support a hard-line on abortion. Most are against the insanity of "any abortion, any time", but like it or not, most reasonable people are for up-to-first-trimester.
It's not an exaggeration to say that 30% of people are "never Republicans" solely because of the fear of the hard-line Republicans on abortion, and that directly led to the Democrats being able to institute Fascism in our country, with Communists as foot soldiers.
We're trying to win an election here.
Agree with the sentiment. But understand that most don't care about the subtlety of political discourse.
Overturning Roe v Wade doesn't make abortion illegal. It gives the mandate back to individual states to legislate on abortion. As how it should be.
That should be your pitch to the 'normies'.
This. Attack abortion by pointing out the horror a 9month abortion which is legal and celebrated in NYC. If a kid is born say a day early and you murdered it the next day you would go to prison for life. But if a woman aborts the exact same kid one day before its due date - its not a problem. It's insane.
Actually, they can reverse previous decisions.
Roe v. Wade, no matter your position on abortion itself, is a shitty decision. Inventing rights out of "penumbras" and "emanations" is shitty jurisprudence, and even if for no other reason, that shitty bit of work is good reason enough to kick Roe v. Wade to the curb once and for all.
In fact I'm prolife but I want R v W overturned because a few unelected bureaucrats should not be able to make laws.
It flies in the face to the concept of separating of powers.
Roe started with a big lie and went up through the courts. Judges aren’t usually considered mere bureaucrats. The judiciary is one of the three branches of government and is sometimes the crucial one because how else do we want major disputes resolved?
I completely agree that Roe was a horrible decision and that it saw the Court taking over what should have been up to the people: a Constitutional Amendment.
This is what is bothering me. Overturning bad precedent is not the same thing as the activism that invented it.
The Supreme Court can absolutely revise its rulings.
True, but they need to overturn Roe v Wade. That has to happen and I wish they would grow the spine to do it. The rest is up to the public.
SCOTUS needs a 14th Amendment dispute to create personhood for the preborn. If a child in the womb is considered a person, then that person has rights and cannot be willfully murdered.
The only difference between you now, and you when you were conceived, is time. To discriminate based on age is against the law. The law should protect all life from the moment of conception.
Although this is where I stand, it is also not enforceable. We can’t scan and know the moment of conception. It would be too invasive. And it would not be right to put someone in jail by force because they took a morning after pill for example. As such it would be wise to have some kind of arbitrary point where killing that unborn life is not lawful. Like age of adulthood. We can name an arbitrary point where the fetus becomes protected under the law. I’d go so far as saying, “When you first realize you are pregnant,” is the point where the life is worth protecting.
I see where you're coming from and I agree. Confirmation of pregnancy would be enough IMO, but the major qualifying factor would have to be proof of intent by actually seeking and having an abortion.
However, it is not uncommon for the child to pass in the first trimester (it's something like 90%+ survival after that). I have been pregnant 6 times, two of which were lost in the first trimester and the four others are laughing and playing together in my living room.
I am anti-Plan B/hormonal birth control based on the risk of ending life at the conception stage, but I have major doubts that they will cease to exist. The biggest impact I can make in society is living according to my beliefs!
Thank you for sharing some of your story. Yes there are so many variations and different situations. Our default should be to protect life.
Also it’s noteworthy to point out re: legality that it’s not the woman who is ‘jailed for having an abortion’ it is the doctor/person performing the murder that is breaking the law under a ‘ban’ on abortion.
Doctors should be saving and promoting life not ending it. Federal funding should not support the ending of unborn children. From there, states can decide and people can move freely to live where their values are upheld.
At 3 months from conception, like most European countries.
When the person is fully independent, like paying their own cell phone bill in their name, then they have the right to live.
JK
I want them to overturn Obergefell too. Talk about voter suppression.
Roe is a prime example of judicial activism, inventing rights that don't exist in the constitution to legitimize an unpopular policy.
DEFUND MURDER CLINICS
That would imply that they stay running. Nuking them is better.
Agreed, but at best, the abortion decision will become a state issue, not a federal one. Not one federal dollar should be sent to murder an unborn child.
What nation seriously wants to say, “Ah, you have another person being created who can help preserve and defend this way of life for another generation; why don’t you end its life before it begins?”
So you admit life doesn’t begin until birth, hypocritical fucking piece of shit
I think you misread or misunderstood what I was saying.
A unique person is created at conception. It is a life worth being protected when you find out about it. Only an idiot would believe life begins at birth.
Can a woman forget her sucking child, that she should not have compassion on the son of her womb? yea, they may forget, yet will I not forget thee.
Isaiah 49:15
Pretty sure they'll stop running (or at least grind to a near-halt) once the libbies realize that they will be the ones who have to pay for it.
Planned Parenthood aka Sanctioned Murder Inc. needs to be eradicated as the plague upon mankind that it is.
Democrat Sanctioned Murder
Mass Infant Sacrifice to Moloch Machine Inc.
2 scoops, 2 terms, 2 genders and 3 scotus picks 👌
3 scoops, 3 terms, 3 SCOTUS picks, and 2 genders.
😁
I mean, you could count hermaphrodites as a 3rd gender...
I could but I won't.
Kinda a "1+1" gender, since a hermaphrodite is a mix of the two.
I’m of the opinion we count Apache helicopter instead.
Words can have more than one meaning. When talkign about gender as the definition that was used at bathrooms, sports and etc..., the definition was gender 1) have Y chromosome and gender 2) not have y chromosome.
3 picks per term.
3 SCOTUS picks, you better think again, this is just the first term...more scotus picks coming in the second term and POTUS knows it.
The people who think she just suddenly going to somehow end abortions are just as stupid as the people on the left who think she's suddenly going to somehow end their right to have those abortions.....
both extremes are absolutely retarded and apparently don't know how the Supreme Court works.
True - Roe v. Wade won't die overnight.
It can however proceed to be contained:
Require all abortion doctors to have hospital privileges at the closest hospital (like any other outpatient surgery).
Require all abortion facilities to be certified by the state hospital board (many are, but some states let that slide.)
Heartbeat laws. If there's a beating heart, you shouldn't be allowed to proceed with an abortion unless the mother's life is in provable immediate or near-immediate (within 9 months) danger from the pregnancy.
Required Informed Consent. This means listing all available adoption agencies and their contact info, all government-funded pre-natal programs, etc.
A mandatory three-day waiting period.
etc etc etc...
I agree with you for the most part, those who think ACB or anyone for that matter is going to completely eradicate abortion is in for a huge disappointment.
The large majority of the "opponents of abortion" will be satisfied w/ taxpayer dollars not allocated to this bullshit. If lunatic whores want to murder their own kids let them do it on their own dime or via "Philanthropy." This organization is a huge money Laundering operation for the dems where they keep funneling millions of American Taxpayers back into their own parties pockets.
Are you saying that as an opposition to this approach? Thought the issue wasn't the tactic but what was actually being targeted. It's quite simple from my perspective. You have a right to a gun. you don't have a right to an abortion.
We are obviously hitting up on differences of world view here so I don't imagine much productive will come of this, but I have a NATURAL right to bear arms. One recognized by the constitution. Any legal "right" to have an abortion is at odds with the natural order and needs to be upended using whatever means necessary to achieve correct alignment. Yes, this is my viewpoint (opinion implies subjectivity) but it is one that I believe to be objective. If I believe this, I am duty bound to defend REAL rights and obligated to protect those who are having their rights deprived (the unborn children) from the falsification of rights. If I hold this perspective, an alignment of tactics is hardly hypocrisy. It's not the lefts tactics that I find issue with here but the target of their tactics.
Let me start off by saying I fully understand where you're coming from about the potential for some truly difficult challenges. However, I'd say life begins at conception. In regards to the wave of children, man... those are human beings. Not just human beings but our countrymen, regardless of race or social class. I'd rather take the burden of figuring it out then the aborting them. The einstein thing isn't as important to me because I have love for all of them. I don't know of you're religious or not but it's an area where my understanding of the divine can't help but be the basis for my political evaluation. Life has to trump stability, comfort and economic prosperity. I also think that it doesn't have to be done in a single faceted way, however. Any effort to end abortion needs to be accompanied by efforts to rebuild families, promote virtuous child rearing, etc in order to mitigate such challenges ahead of time. What's the point of it all if not to defend and sacrifice for the beauty of life?
That's precisely where I went with it. This way, they'll be a bit more eager to start easing up.
A child has a right to life; there's are two parties involved in an abortion procedure. Your concerns are inane.
They don’t know how real life works
Dude, chill. We obviously know that she can't just end it, but there will be a time when her vote will be CRITICAL in such cases. We're just having fun. This site is a high energy machine that pumps out delicious memes from time to time. You're the dumbass for taking this literally.
They also don’t know how memes work which is why we laugh.
Hoes mad.
I don't see Roe v Wade being overturned. Once the window has shifted and society largely accepts that, it's not shifting back
The 2024 Republican candidate needs to run on a lot of issues, and this isn't necessarily a winner
What's even more key to understand is that even if Roe v Wade is overturned, it doesn't immediately make abortion illegal. What happens is that it becomes a state issue where individual states will set their own laws on it, many of which ALREADY HAVE. Abortions will still be happening and the states that are already performing abortions are going to continue to perform them.
The biggest changes that we might see out of this is changes to WHEN a abortion can happen. For example, I can see some states implementing things like heartbeat laws or 9 week laws. Things like that to limit certain aspects of abortion that previously were restricted by RvW.
Yep, exactly right. The genie isn't going back in the bottle. If blue states allow late term abortion now, they will allow it after Roe v Wade gets overturned
The only way I could see the genie going back in is if the ruling is made that children in the womb are entitled to the full rights of American citizens and as such willfully terminating the pregnancy would be depriving them of their right to life (which is true, just need SCOTUS to say that)
"society largely accepts that" Leans into mic...Wrong. Maybe baby killing leftist has accepted it. But a large majority of Americans have not.
The large majority don't approve strict gun control either but they vote Democrats anyway.
I agree.
I think that there are a few issues that Conservatives need to "get over" if they want to have any chance of avoiding the larger issue.
Legal weed? A non-issue. Gay marriage? Non-issue.
Conservatives need to focus on the stuff that ACTUALLY is wrong like transitioning children, cancel culture, baseless accusations on social media ruining lives, economy, etc.
The moment those who stand on the side of truth and righteous cause cede those issues, is the moment our nation passes through the point of no return.
Agreed (about weed)
I agree. Don't forget pedophilia, backpedaling on civil rights (which is what California wants), crippling taxes... As long as my Church doesn't get forced to marry same-sex couples, it is a non-issue.
All of this.
And I agree with you 100%.
I'm gay and I would NEVER want someone to be forced to marry me. If someone isn't comfortable, that's their right.
Every church has their own way of interpreting the faith and should be allowed to do so.
No, homo marriage is a big part of the destruction of the family and one of the instrument of the white genocide.
It's extremely important to reject the normalization of that behavior.
Also you're naive if you don't think homo marriage and transitioning children are related.
I personally think the destruction of the family is due to increased sex positivity or rather "have as much sex as you can, it doesn't make you a whore!", the rise of feminism, and the media's war against monogamy.
There are plenty of gay people against transitioning children. Just because there's a vocal minority doesn't mean the whole group is bad.
The insane trans people who push the transitioning children narrative more often than not do not identify as gay. They have a paraphilia of dressing like the opposite sex. I've been advocating for the "T" to be removed from the LGB(T) for a long time because it has nothing to do with sexuality.
But agree to disagree.
And sedition Ala antifa and BLM. All funded by democrats
huh? do people actually support killing babies outside of the internet? i dont actually know anyone who is pro baby-murder.
Go drive by PP any day of the week, you’ll get your answer.
PPModern Ritual Human Sacrifice TempleMoloch has to eat.
I don't think it could really happen without there being a big re-enervated national discussion about it. I used to support abortion just because I hadn't really heard good arguments about it. Once I did, I realised the pro-life side had excellent and much better arguments. But those discussions aren't really happening, except for within groups that have already made up their mind. The result is stagnation and acceptance of what already is.
Moloch won't be happy with Amy Thanos Barrett.
TheDonald makes the best meme, hands down.
Ironically, unlike Thanos, this would actually save lives.
it needs to be the Iron Man version of the glove
Just stop ALL federal funding, the perpetually butthurt retards won't realize that if all the idiots throwing a hissy fit each year for the woman's march just donated the amount of money they spend being a giant attention whore, PP would actually make MORE money.
Actually it would be a five member team effort of ACB, Thomas, Kav, ,,,
Trump is the one with the Glove as he collected them all.
We just want to have a common sense discussion about infanticide, no one is coming for your abortions
yet
You are going to panic the leftists, but LOL
“We’re going past the point of no return!”
Doooooo iiiitttttt!!!!!!
Repealing unconstitutional precedent should not be referred to as activism
Yeah, great meme, but not going to happen.
That they are. Great job!
"But who will abort the blacks if Planned Parenthood isnt around?" Said the white liberal.
Just reposted this to reddit. I'm timing it to see how quick I'm banned.
Fine I’ll do it myself
Now, let us pray.
NOOOOOO! YOU CANT JUST STOP TAX PAYER FUNDED BABY KILLING!!!!!!!
It was only recently, after I've learned more about the American justice system, that I realized that Justice Amy is in fact, not our champion.
She is a champion of our forefathers.
It's a lot like how an executioner is not a murderer. It's just the pointy end of the stick.
It must take great strength to decide on something that's against your personal preference. It is up to all of us that Justice Amy does not have to deal with shitty laws written by horrible people.
I can just imagine how basketball players became increasingly more creative and athletic and finding more exploits to win a game. It was up to the commission to fine tune the rules so the game didn't turn ridiculous. The referee is not supposed to decide in favor of his favorite team.
Vince McMahon meme theme
Notorious ACB meme?
Thanos meme?
ACB/Thanos meme mashup?
Planned Parenthood being dusted?
nut
This isn't gonna happen, just being honest.
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEĘEEEEEEEEEEEÉEEEEEEEEEÊEEEEEEEEEEĒEEEEEEEEEEĖEEEEEEEEEEËEEEEEEEEÊ!¡¡¡¡!!!!
But muh womyn's healthcare!
Save the babies!!!
I don't think she's going to over turn anything, but this is funny to tease the libtards with.
Just tell them we are aborting Planned Parenthood. They'll be OK with that.
Glorious!
"I am... inevitable." - fetus
Leftists love the MCU and will reeee at this meme. Have an upvote.
How is Barrett going to effect Planned Parenthood FFS?
not likely.
scc usually respects own precedent.
What we need is legislature from congress on this.
This is entirely too EPIC!!! Great job OP!!!
is this real?
I should’ve been aborted & I approve this message.
Glad that you are here!
I don’t think the court can shut them down or would ever rule to do so but as a private company they really shouldn’t be getting public funding.
Overturning bad precedent is within the scope of the supreme court.
I hope you're right. We are hit and miss with SCOTUS justices. Dems never miss with theirs.
PLEASE DEFUND THIS BABY KILLING MACHINE.
So spicy, make it so.
Damn it I love our memes.