2860
Comments (48)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
FLatinoKAG 10 points ago +10 / -0

Did the virus weaken? Were death counts exaggerated in the beginning? Are we better at dealing with infected?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
9
Skogin 9 points ago +10 / -1

Did this virus actually kill anyone? Was it simply blammed for ‘normal deaths’ and a glut of terrible malpractice leading to a manufactured crisis?

Mass Hysteria

14
_Sully_ 14 points ago +14 / -0

Malpractice is up there for sure. In the early days presumptive cases (not tested) were swiftly shot up with fent and put on a ventilator and summarily killed. Only the strongest would survive such an ordeal. One case of survival was a junkie with a high tolerance of opiates. He lived because the fent wore off enough that he regained consciousness and managed to pull his vent tube out. Yes, this was happening and all these hospitals that followed a bullshit pulled-out-of-someone’s-ass protocol are gonna regret favoring the greed route. Did you know that even in the early days there was a doctor trying to fight this protocol by stating that he learned from working in a third world country that if you lay a SARS patient on their tummy they’d oxygenate better? Well he was shut up real quick and his patients were forced onto vents.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
_Sully_ 7 points ago +7 / -0

I recently heard of a case where someone was placed on a vent for over 45 days. There lungs are toast and they need a transplant to survive. It wasn’t Covid that did that.

6
booblitchutz 6 points ago +6 / -0

When the flu comes back, deaths will rise - and that will be people already dying.

The PCR tests will call them "covid" but the PCR tests are bullshit.

4
bobobob 4 points ago +4 / -0

The early push to get people on ventilators probably killed a bunch of people.

9
NYC_4_Trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

I’m not a doctor. That said, I’ve read a lot about unique points on the virus.

Did the virus weaken?

No. It was just never as deadly as we were led to believe. When the virus first hit, the MSM was reporting a mortality rate of 3%. If that number held, there would be bodies stacked in parking lots. The mortality number is anywhere from .25-.50%

Were deaths exaggerated?

I would say yes. If you look to states like NY and CA, their death tallies include “probable” COVID deaths. At last check, approximately 1/3 of NY deaths were listed as “probable COVID.” That means no confirmation. Of course, we know states had incentive to “pump up” the numbers. They were paid per COVID case. That isn’t some rumor. Cuomo is even on record complaining that Nebraska gets more per patient than NY.

Are we better at treating it?

We certainly aren’t doing much to stop its spread - mask requirements included. If masks work, there no reason why we’d be having spikes. But deaths are way down. We aren’t so quick to put people on ventilators. We’re preemptively treating patients with steroids to prevent damaging inflammation. We also have treatments like Remdesivir and other therapeutics that are reducing hospitalizations and ventilations.

In sum: The virus is probably here to stay. Just like we have cold and flu season, we will have coronavirus season.

One interesting point: coronavirus is mutating very slowly (when compared to the flu.) Experts aren’t sure why. This is a good thing - as it gives time for herd immunity to take hold.

5
Workhorse101 5 points ago +5 / -0

Another interesting fact to add to your layman's knowledge which is the same as mine.

Coronavirus spreads around the globe 4 out of every 10 years as explained in the video below by world virus expert Dolores Cahill, whose currently being cancelled by the establishment for speaking out.

https://youtu.be/MxtdPcsD5Ss

4
Skogin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope you repost this elsewhere so more people see it!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Chick-fill-eh 6 points ago +6 / -0

The low hanging fruit is now dead.

6
FudgyFudgeBots 6 points ago +6 / -0

Step 1. The virus was first introduced into nursing homes where it was expected to cause massive deaths.

Step 2. The media had wall to wall coverage of multitudes of deaths until the people were racked with fear.

Step 3. Lockdowns were instituted for "safety" ( actually to crush the economy.)

Step 4. Now that people have been brainwashed to believe that number of new cases equals number of deaths, all they have to do is report on number of new cases and the people freak out.

Step 5. They have successfully been able to get people to give up freedom voluntarily. They now know how gullible people are and how far they can push.