2346
Comments (85)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
44
pmurTJdlanoD 44 points ago +44 / -0

And central banking, no? (The less discussed part of the story)

37
deleted 37 points ago +37 / -0
17
TRUMP420KUSH 17 points ago +17 / -0

And he didn't even sink the Titanic, it was an insurance job and they sank the sister ship.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
4
Jastra 4 points ago +4 / -0

Never heard this one. Any other info?

4
TRUMP420KUSH 4 points ago +4 / -0

Basically the original ship they built was damaged a few times and it was a financial burden for the owners. So they built a brand new ship that was almost identical to the original that now had a clean title and history. They swapped the boats and sent the old one out to sink. They could now make an insurance claim and basically double up.

Thats the quick rundown of what i remember reading.

8
pmurTJdlanoD 8 points ago +8 / -0

Apt username and yes this is the shit they don’t put into history books