Republicans “changes the rules” by never actually changing the rules, but by acting as they could using their legitimate authority. Harry Reed (D) changed the rules as to confirming federal judges. The leftists always destroy the system when they are losing within the established rules of the system.
Before Reed the Democrats were the ones who changed the rules to use the filibuster to block nominations. Then when Republicans did this Reed changed the rules to break the filibuster. Now Republicans use Reeds new rule to break the filibuster. Democrats are so short sighted, and they always believe they will be in power forever.
Exactly. The Merrick Garland situation was Senate Republicans utilizing their position of relative strength to lawfully block Garland's appointment. They didn't change anything, they just had the votes and the Constitutional authority to do what they want. Same with ACB.
Both cases were politically inconvenient for Democrats, so naturally they're trying to claim Republicans did something illegal or unethical. But it's all bullshit and they would do exactly the same if they were in that position.
Does anyone honestly believe Democrats would have honored Scalia's "dying wish" if he had made such a preposterous demand as RBG allegedly did? Come on, man.
Republicans “changes the rules” by never actually changing the rules, but by acting as they could using their legitimate authority. Harry Reed (D) changed the rules as to confirming federal judges. The leftists always destroy the system when they are losing within the established rules of the system.
Before Reed the Democrats were the ones who changed the rules to use the filibuster to block nominations. Then when Republicans did this Reed changed the rules to break the filibuster. Now Republicans use Reeds new rule to break the filibuster. Democrats are so short sighted, and they always believe they will be in power forever.
Exactly. The Merrick Garland situation was Senate Republicans utilizing their position of relative strength to lawfully block Garland's appointment. They didn't change anything, they just had the votes and the Constitutional authority to do what they want. Same with ACB.
Both cases were politically inconvenient for Democrats, so naturally they're trying to claim Republicans did something illegal or unethical. But it's all bullshit and they would do exactly the same if they were in that position.
Does anyone honestly believe Democrats would have honored Scalia's "dying wish" if he had made such a preposterous demand as RBG allegedly did? Come on, man.