Maybe blue states that have mail in voting could of told them this. But noooo. They use it to cheat. They wanted it to work to force everystate to have mail in voting in the future.
Something like 20% of mail in ballots are rejected for errors. Like signature not matching, ballot miss marked, or improperly marked so it can't be read by machine. No postage, although in Washington postage is covered by the state. Even though there is drop boxes.
Maybe blue states that have mail in voting could of told them this. But noooo. They use it to cheat. They wanted it to work to force everystate to have mail in voting in the future.
Something like 20% of mail in ballots are rejected for errors. Like signature not matching, ballot miss marked, or improperly marked so it can't be read by machine. No postage, although in Washington postage is covered by the state. Even though there is drop boxes.
Where are you finding this stat?
Heard it on a radio show. But if you search with duckduck new Jersey comes up, wisconsin comes up, and some guy named Greg plast has a story.
Also abc had this story
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/750000-mail-ballots-rejected-2016-2018-matters/story?id=73645323
It says the last two years 20%+- of mail in ballots rejected 2016-2018.
They link to a government site that probably has more info but it's all spread sheets.
california... Please God, give me this, I neeeeeeeed the salt!!!
Oregon to DNC: this mail-in voting thing is a great way to ensure we always win. Try it!!1!
DNC: Sounds awesome, let's do it!
<5 months later>
DNC: Shit, it's not working!
Oregon: Well, yeah, you have to train fraudsters, it takes a few elections to get it right.
DNC: Now you tell us! We're so fucked!
American People: <run out of popcorn>
From Washington state and I can confirm.