5920
Comments (448)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
9
superfly 9 points ago +10 / -1

„Yooo, they didn‘t need so many fucking shots yooo ...“. I have to agree.
One to the forehead would also suffice.

10
Farage_massage 10 points ago +10 / -0

Notice how “rules” come Back into it when they’re eating asphalt all of a sudden.

8
AmyBuckhorn45 8 points ago +8 / -0

Notice how the cameraman immediately hides the action as soon as the attacker starts toward the officers.

~ "Uhoh, I don't want to catch him running at these dudes."

1
CuomoisaMassMurderer 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Footage stops as Police fire. You can clearly see the now dead guy stalking the cops, with the cops trying to maintain a safe distance.

8
Konsaki 8 points ago +8 / -0

A headshot on a moving target, while you yourself are moving, when you barely get any rangetime? Yeah... sounds easy enough my dog could do it.

3
WhitePowerRanger 3 points ago +5 / -2

texas church shooter stopper has entered the chat

9
Konsaki 9 points ago +10 / -1
  • Hero was stationary, unlike the two police constantly retreating
  • Clear backdrop behind Shooter, unlike what the police had to deal with
  • Hero spent a lot of time on the range with his firearm, vastly more than your average police officer

So... yeah, your comparison is bunk.

0
WhitePowerRanger 0 points ago +1 / -1

What comparison? I said texas shooter stopper has entered the chat

But since you’re a know it all cunt:

• police could have become stationary by not moving

• uhm wut does a wall have to do with anything

•hero spent a lot of time at the range cause he was a former police officer you dingaling. He received the same training those officers received and spent similar times at the range. What do you think police just sit around and eat donuts all day?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0