3309 () posted 170 days ago by MaMa_JuJu_BooBoo 170 days ago by MaMa_JuJu_BooBoo +3310 / -1 963 comments share 963 comments share save hide report block hide child comments Comments (963) sorted by: top new old worst You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread. ▲ 77 ▼ – deleted 77 points 170 days ago +77 / -0 ▲ 32 ▼ – Nomoralcompass89 32 points 170 days ago +32 / -0 This needs stickied to the top too, its important info. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 15 ▼ – Ghost0_ 15 points 170 days ago +15 / -0 I interpreted that as they had delayed the posting of the article up until now. And that they limited the included photos to only these two due to the liability in posting other available photos (implying they’re even worse). permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 12 ▼ – deleted 12 points 170 days ago +12 / -0 ▲ 10 ▼ – deleted 10 points 170 days ago +11 / -1 ▲ 3 ▼ – Herecomedatpresident 3 points 170 days ago +3 / -0 Yeah they delayed and held back additional photos from the article they did release today. permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 7 ▼ – IcculusBased9 7 points 170 days ago +7 / -0 Sounds like a deadman's switch permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 4 ▼ – deleted 4 points 170 days ago +4 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 170 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 2 ▼ – deleted 2 points 170 days ago +2 / -0 ▲ 1 ▼ – deleted 1 point 170 days ago +1 / -0 ▲ 3 ▼ – lixa 3 points 170 days ago +3 / -0 So this is saying there is more proof that is not in this article? permalink parent save report block reply ▲ 5 ▼ – deleted 5 points 170 days ago +5 / -0
This needs stickied to the top too, its important info.
I interpreted that as they had delayed the posting of the article up until now. And that they limited the included photos to only these two due to the liability in posting other available photos (implying they’re even worse).
Yeah they delayed and held back additional photos from the article they did release today.
Sounds like a deadman's switch
So this is saying there is more proof that is not in this article?