Because one is a useful distraction from the efforts of people currently in highly powerful places and the other is their belief system and desired form of world governance, which they are trying to distract you from.
Let me ask you this, might help if someone has some legal understanding of the current laws.
They claim they are exempt from a certain legal status, however big tech social media co’s are Operating as if they are currently under that legal status, will they not be open for “damages” for violating the existing statute?
Bottom line question, can they be retroactively sued for violating the legal status they are claiming to be?
Retroactively, stockholders could stage a class action lawsuit for fraudulently representing what the company is. Arguably, they could also sue @jack and the board personally for abandoning their fiduciary duties
Other than that, I’m not a lawyer so I don’t know what other options are out there
I want holocaust deniers, flat earthers, moon landing conspiracists and even liberals to all have a platform to express opinions and ideas... regardless of how retarded they are.
If you aren’t allowed to question a historical event you have to wonder if there is something to hide.
Something something wooden doors
Sorry - I don’t get the reference. Anyone help?
Lmao
Sounds like someone’s ready to get deported from Donald.win
Yeah, millions of those Russians also shot themselves before departing to non-existent Gulags. Gtfo here, dimwit.
I'm a Russky. Tell me more, bitch.
Your village is missing an idiot.
Because one is a useful distraction from the efforts of people currently in highly powerful places and the other is their belief system and desired form of world governance, which they are trying to distract you from.
They won't report on their own.
This fucking osama bin laden looking Commie MF needs a American Hellfire missle delivered to him stat!!!! Fuck Twatter!!!!
They really don’t want their long march through the institutions to be stopped now that they are so close.
Their financial ties need to be made public, we must see who’s funding this bullshit
Let me ask you this, might help if someone has some legal understanding of the current laws.
Bottom line question, can they be retroactively sued for violating the legal status they are claiming to be?
Retroactively, stockholders could stage a class action lawsuit for fraudulently representing what the company is. Arguably, they could also sue @jack and the board personally for abandoning their fiduciary duties
Other than that, I’m not a lawyer so I don’t know what other options are out there
I want holocaust deniers, flat earthers, moon landing conspiracists and even liberals to all have a platform to express opinions and ideas... regardless of how retarded they are.
Bingo. And nobody owes anyone to be polite to anyone either, especially online.
This cuck
Bro come on who cares about it. It's about the blatant hypocrecy of social media
Don't apologize. Don't worry about it man. Don't get triggered bro whoever gets angry loses! It's ok
Neither should be flagged.
What 43 year old male has a fucking nose ring. Oh wait.
Fucking cuck faggot
He's becoming Amish
Twitter is done.
Bit of a flex to not even bother to straighten out your camera
Jack Dorsey straight from tent city.
Is this real? He looks like Osama bin Laden.
Looks more and more like a terrorist every day.
They shouldn't be flagging anything not prohibited by law. Period. The moment they start, they should be deleted out of existence.