6154
Did the FBI Grab the Tucker Docs? F-orever B-urying I-nformtion (theconservativetreehouse.com) 🙉 FIRE WRAY! 🙉
posted ago by jackdaniels ago by jackdaniels +6154 / -0
Comments (665)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
10
BecMonTchew 10 points ago +11 / -1

I don't have it figured out, at all, hence my post. I'm an economist, not a lawyer. Why not just "legally" take it and bury it like everything else instead of resorting to movie shit? Why did Tucker have it sent through the pony express in the first place? I like numbers, but this isn't adding up to my smooth brain. I need a big brain to spell it out for me.

Edit: Ooh, unless you think I'm making a case to exonerate the FBI? Not at all. This seems like it was most likely a domestic job, in which case it could only have been perpetrated by a three letter agency. I'm just wondering why they went through the back door instead of the usual open SOP that we can't do shit about. They have 0 fucks to give about us as long as the deep state gravy train keeps rolling. 'Member Seth Rich's and Anthony Wiener's laptops? I 'member. But none of us have seen dick about what they found on them 4 years later. And that's not even scratching the surface of the shit they've buried. We're not at odds, fren.

2
xxxMAGA420xxx 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably worried about lengthy legal challenges.

A back door approach is the "apologize later if you're wrong" approach. The FBI is never held accountable so they will just say sorry when this is all over.

1
DiscoverAFire 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legal interception might be seen as validating the claims? If the paper disappears "oops the false claims got lost in the mail", maybe tucker doesn't even realize certain pages are missing.

If the FBI is known to have done this "It must be serious, the FBI is involved"