5719
Comments (403)
sorted by:
379
deleted 379 points ago +394 / -15
153
Infuriator 153 points ago +155 / -2

I fully expected to see Bill Clinton is a rapist at the bottom of this list.

70
lefkoslykos 70 points ago +71 / -1

OP there's still time!

36
PyroSphere 36 points ago +36 / -0

Yes, just go and change it after the fact like Dims do with ballots.

22
deleted 22 points ago +22 / -0
18
PyroSphere 18 points ago +18 / -0

Strongly worded, and in italics no less!

12
DeadOverRed 12 points ago +12 / -0

Oh man. Well, as long as they don't pull out the bold font.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
16
JackIsALarp 16 points ago +17 / -1

Luckily for us she didn't have a cocktober surprise

12
Wtf_socialismreally 12 points ago +14 / -2

If Hillary came out right now and showed that she had a dick I'd vote for her because of how surprised and off guard I'd be. My entire world view would come crashing down. I'd even start to believe that Michael is just the product of inbreeding and not actually a big dicked man.

8
JackIsALarp 8 points ago +9 / -1

Then you are in luck. I have the perfect candidate for you!

https://i.maga.host/hoi0mDr.png

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +2 / -0

IT'S GOT WHAT PLANTS CRAVE

3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
8
labajada 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's still October, where's Hunter?

7
JackIsALarp 7 points ago +7 / -0

Plagiarizing a long letter to Anthony Weiner for oh shit what do I do advice.

4
MAGAPlenty 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hunter needs a lover like Huma Abedin

3
JackIsALarp 3 points ago +3 / -0

ew....

9
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 9 points ago +9 / -0

Epstein didn’t kill himself.

4
Infuriator 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also would’ve been acceptable.

5
NebDakFly2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also Epstein didn't kill himself

58
R_e_d_d_a_w_n 58 points ago +60 / -2

It's not a police state. It's a color revolution. The communists have made their move, and backed Trump into a corner. If he loses, they maintain control and if he wins they launch the revolution.

This will come down to whether the military sides with the people or the communists.

Given the rebellion by Esper, I'd say they side with the communists.

They have to do this or they hang.

Be ready.

35
deleted 35 points ago +36 / -1
35
pete0726 35 points ago +35 / -0

Commander-in- Chief. A commander-in-chief or supreme commander is the person who exercises supreme command and control over an armed forces or a military branch. As a technical term, it refers to military competencies that reside in a country's executive leadership, a head of state or a head of government. What Nancy is talking about is the last ditch effort at a coup. a sudden, violent, and illegal seizure of power from a government. Enlisted make up the majority of the military. We take the oath to protect this country from enemies foriegn and domestic. Stand tall patriots and remember your oath.

15
glow-operator-2-0 15 points ago +15 / -0

Are you telling me that fragging one's senior officers who are faggots for going against their country is a thing again?

nice

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
12
thebigbear 12 points ago +12 / -0

Military swear an allegiance to the constitution hence, TRUMP is their COMMANDER. Many a officier were fragged in Nam when they gave unlawful orders. Hence, there were extremely low conviction rates for fragging. Cause/Effect. The military will follow TRUMP. Officers issuing unconstitutional orders will be detained early and often. Military is extremely BASED. Military is like the Revolutionary War troops. Military is not the "privilege class" but the down to earth hard working americans you see every day. Get out and VOTE but more importantly keep RED PILLING everyone you see. Keep the faith, spread the faith, and work the faith.

Store up, Arm up, Standby( 5 more days)

10
Wtf_socialismreally 10 points ago +13 / -3

Well, the number of guns owned by Trump supporters may be larger than the number of guns held by our military's hands at the same time.

Right now the MAGA revolution is peaceful. I have a feeling from seeing the popular support that people are preparing more and more for that to change.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
12
Wtf_socialismreally 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think the moment patriots have their votes subverted or Trump is not in office, things will start to get bad, and it won't be pretty.

We already know that within 100 days of a Democrat presidency that they would give millions of illegals citizenship.

That would destroy this country if left unchecked.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
Commiesarenotpeople 5 points ago +5 / -0

We'll take their citizenship away after the war.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Philhelm 3 points ago +3 / -0

One big problem is that a Biden victory is already tainted because of all of the suspicious things surrounding mail-in voting, Hillary's suggestion that he not concede, the "Red Mirage," etc.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
undefined 7 points ago +7 / -0

It’s not easy to shoot an enemy combatant - it’s even harder to shoot our current enemies

Journalists, teachers, city council members, district attorneys, community organizers.

These are the ones that would flip the switch on this whole thing. It’s millions of regular people marching us off a cliff.

That’s the scary part

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
Granny 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tax rebellion! Don't need much organization to do that, just enough anger!!!

5
Philhelm 5 points ago +5 / -0

The military isn't large enough to police a nation as large and populous as the U.S. Assuming that nuking U.S. suburbs is off the table (and if it's not, then no point in even worrying about it), then the U.S. military would be at a huge disadvantage. They would probably be relegated to defending key sites (nuclear missile silos, water, energy, etc.).

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Philhelm 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the event that there is a bona fide civil war/revolution involving millions of combatants, there simply aren't enough drones and intel to win a war. The U.S. military is the most powerful military force the world has ever seen, but its greatness rests upon its ability to utterly annihilate the enemy. The U.S. military is far less effective when it comes to policing a population, since that is not what it is designed to do. Policing a nation requires boots on ground, and the U.S. is far too vast and populous, especially if you take into consideration the strain that Iraq and Afghanistan put on our military. In addition, the military would face the extra challenges of its "battleground" being its native soil. They would have to deal with a huge drain to morale, the risk of defection (I think that most would obey orders, but defection would occur), disruption to supplies, etc. A drone could be effective if it is targeting a group of armed rebels, but all of the people buying full battle rattle aren't going to want to use it since being incognito would be more valuable.

4
Demonspawn 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the event that there is a bona fide civil war/revolution involving millions of combatants

The first thing the revolutionaries would do is destroy the power grid. And then the government would be fighting on all fronts: the revolutionaries, the rioters, and then even the loyalists who convert after government can't keep them safe and fed. Add the inability to transport food on top of the loss of power and inner cities will become bloodbaths as everyone fights everyone in the dark for the last can of beans.

Yes, the USA has awesome weapons of destruction, but they're useless in civil warfare. You don't bomb your own factories. You don't nuke your own land. It would be the worst guerilla warfare possible because you can't use the big tools you have available.

There's an old saying: "War is easy. Pacification is hard." This would be pacification without the war in front to weaken the infrastructure of the guerillas.

1
Philhelm 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree with all points.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
Philhelm 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cut out their eyes and nose and fill their faces with sawdust.

2
somercet 2 points ago +2 / -0

During the Civil War, four groups emerged:

  1. The Navy remained loyal.
  2. West Point officers split 50-50. As one would expect, given that Senators filed recommendations for WP.
  3. Non-West Point officers went almost entirely South.
  4. The rank-and-file army tended to remain Union.

We are likely to see such groups emerge.

1
RonJoner 1 point ago +1 / -0

Military will split along racial lines

Source: was in the military

On the bright side, most of the fighters (infantry, SF, seals etc) are pro Trump

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
Snowdone 15 points ago +15 / -0

Spot on. Pelosi did say months ago “a Trump is leaving whether he knows it or not” Biden did say the military will remove him. We can stop that! Do not accept that. They military can try to remove The President but they can’t remove us b

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
the-new-style 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where do you think the Brass will stand when the foreign troops arrive ?

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +2 / -2

The military leadership are against Trump. There is little doubt about that.

2
StarGirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not because they have good hearts, but because they're corrupt and don't want their gravy train to stop.

34
SquiggyMcPepe 34 points ago +34 / -0

They are all in now. Expect large riots on election night to try to keep people from voting. Vote now if possible.

23
randomusename 23 points ago +23 / -0

They were emboldened by appearing before congress and no consequences yet again, all talk.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
21
Rufus_Shinra 21 points ago +21 / -0

I fully expect Twitter to suspend Trumps account on election night or the days that follow once the counting of fraudulent Biden ballots begins and states start flipping from Trump to Biden. The media will declare Biden the winner and the free flow of anything contrary will be shut down.

3
Grond999 3 points ago +6 / -3

Twitter is a fhcking BOSS of a company. They treat Trump's account like an unwanted rag doll. Yes, a suspension won't be surprising. I expect this of Twitter....and shed no tears. Twitter and big tech were an issue prior to the Trump 2016 win.

3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
JackLemon 3 points ago +4 / -1

Maybe, but the problem is the center and independents won't follow and they are the ones we need to convince.

2
Sticky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let them have their circle jerk

4
thuggishruggishtrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

National Guard on standby

16
eagleeyeddjt 16 points ago +30 / -14

Please no Q crap

14
deleted 14 points ago +27 / -13
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
eagleeyeddjt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trust Sessions, right? F*** off, Q is a LARP and always has been.

-9
JackLemon -9 points ago +3 / -12

You're a moron and QAnon is a proven fraud.

3
Dr0neRec0very 3 points ago +6 / -3

Q is consistently patriotic and consistently supportive of our president. I know first hand that you can't say the same about your conservative-larping buddy Fox News (I check daily). None the less, here you are spamming the living fuck out of Fox News in your submissions, while smearing someone who is consistently supportive of the president. You're wrong.

2
Dr0neRec0very 2 points ago +5 / -3

"proven fraud" lol Yes, tell us all about how someone on a Q board said something about JFK once, so "proven fraud". I wouldn't trust fake news to lick the shit off my boots, let alone to "prove" a pro-Trump American patriot is a "fraud". There's a really good chance you've never even looked at the Q board yourself to begin with, but let's shit on a Trump patriot anyway.

1
StarGirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point trying to prove QAnon doesn't exist is like trying to prove God doesn't exist. QAnon is a thing with a life of its own.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think everyone acknowledges QAnon exists and most know it's a fraud. What they don't know is who are the grifters behind it and how much of it is infiltrated and controlled by the deep state and NeverTrumpers.

9
2020yall 9 points ago +12 / -3

What is Q?

9
Liberty_Prime 9 points ago +11 / -2

something that should happen at greatawakening.win

4
MaxineWaters4Prez 4 points ago +5 / -1

And remain there

0
Dr0neRec0very 0 points ago +2 / -2

"And remain there" Sounds like you miss those sweet reddit days of METICULOUSLY CONTROLLING the speech of others: especially pro-Trump others.

3
2020yall 3 points ago +4 / -1

What's that?

1
Liberty_Prime 1 point ago +4 / -3

Take those fingers of yours and type it into a search engine.

It's a .win domain, so your device won't get a virus.

It's bullshit.

2
Friendly_B 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's this about .win domains and viruses? News to me.

3
Liberty_Prime 3 points ago +3 / -0

All I'm saying is it's not some shady site out of North Korea or China. Dot win domains were set up as new homes for sites that were banned on Reddit.

0
Dr0neRec0very 0 points ago +2 / -2

xD Ahhhh What's wrong, rino??? You seem upset! Trump 2Q2Q!!! :D

5
deleted 5 points ago +21 / -16
1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +3 / -2

"simple minded people" They're all pro-Trump American patriots and they include millions of Trump supporters from around the world, so please continue your knee-jerk trained reaction.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Not even close to A million let alone Millions." kek Oh, now you're the official Q census director, on top of obsessively smearing CONSISTENTLY pro-Trump American patriots. xD Nice. Not surprised. "should we still trust Sessions" It doesn't matter WHO you trust, dumb-dumb: You have no power anyway. What? You thought you could personally fire Jeff Sessions because he didn't do what you want him to do??? xD You can trust whoever and whatever the fuck you want when you have exactly ZERO CONTACT with that individual or THE LEAST BIT OF CONTROL over that person. You simply don't matter, trust or no trust.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
-10
JackLemon -10 points ago +2 / -12

Get lost Qtarded shill. People brighter than ground squirrels know what you're peddling is a complete bullshit fraud.

8
Minarchist_Manlet 8 points ago +9 / -1

WTF is wrong with you idiots?

The guy just answered the question. He didn't advocate. I'm not a Q believer, but what he said about the MSM and "Qanon" is 100% true. People who follow Q are Trump supporters. Regardless of whether or not it's true or a LARP, Q has brought thousands - perhaps millions of new voters out of the shadows in support of Trump.

I guess they're all just a basket of deplorables to you.

4
Dr0neRec0very 4 points ago +6 / -2

"WTF is wrong with you idiots?" Yea, gotta wonder why 50% of 'conservatives' on this site become immediately agitated at the mention of a consistently pro-Trump patriot. They're ok with Fox News, though, and Fox News spends half their time soft-pedaling anti-American "democrat" propaganda. The same can't be said about Q. You'd think an actual conservative would at least be as offended by the mention of traitor trash Fox. Nope!

-6
JackLemon -6 points ago +1 / -7

Some are Trump supporters and some are NeverTrumpers and Dimocrats whose goal is to sully Trump and the MAGA movement. If you were bright enough to pay attention you would know that the grifters operating the scam and their Qtarded followers were instrumental in defending several of Trump's enemies like Sessions, Rosenstein, Gowdy and others. That blunted the outcry for a special counsel and the firing of Sessions. The direct effect being their actions prolonged Mueller's witch hunt.

Now, as I and others successfully predicted, the QAnon movement itself is being used to undermine all Trump supporters. The media are scaring the populace that it is a potential violent Pro-Trump group that could become terroristic.

4
RussianAgent13 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe whoever is operating Q trusted Sessions, Rosenstein, and Gowdy? A lot of people did, without listening to Q. Why does everything have to be a scam.

1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +3 / -2

"Some are Trump supporters and some are NeverTrumpers and Dimocrats whose goal is to sully Trump and the MAGA movement." This is a 100% bullshit claim. Q isn't a club. Various other anonymous accounts aren't Q. Q is ALWAYS pro-Trump and ALWAYS pro-American patriot. You can ask yourself why you're spreading a lie here; I don't care to hear your excuse.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
-1
JackLemon -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yep, smooth brained morons working to undermine Trump and the MAGA movement.

1
StarGirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q Anons aren't working to undermine Trump, but there are definitely people trying to infiltrate from the outside to do that.

1
Dr0neRec0very 1 point ago +4 / -3

"Get lost Qtarded" lol You might try asking Spez to ban us. He's at r/complaints.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +2 / -2

They gave you drooling morons your own forum on .win hoping you'd stay there and not pollute this forum with your stupidity and cult-like beliefs. You tards are dumber and more destructive to Trump and MAGA than the DNC and deep state.

-2
Dr0neRec0very -2 points ago +1 / -3

"your own forum" But, democrat, we're not in this to talk to ourselves. We're not compulsive masturbaters like you, after all. Again, you can take your little democrat ass over to r/complaints, whining to Spez, if you want the old way back. Let's be honest; you're probably coming from over there, anyway.

-2
Dr0neRec0very -2 points ago +1 / -3

"You tards are dumber and more destructive" Your real problem with consistently patriotic Trump-supporting Q is pretty clear, based on your usual democrat projection: you're not bright enough to understand even the most simple Q drop, so you're here talking shit, with sad, little democrat geysers shooting out of both eyes. Poor thing. You should've tried harder in school. Oh, then there's the possibility that Q doesn't support your favorite vice and you're just scared we're going to take it from you. What is it? Pedophilia? Drugs??? Be honest.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
0
MustBeTrump 0 points ago +6 / -6

I swear I lose brain cells reading this cancerous bullshit. [Q posts]

Why do they have to type like such fucking retards [Brainlets]

HOW DID THIS GET SO MANY UPVOTES [Q-TARD INVASION]

3
kc5ods 3 points ago +4 / -1

i want to believe in Q, but it reads like a Dr. Bronner shampoo bottle

-1
StarGirl -1 points ago +1 / -2

Go back to /pol/ and look at pictures of Hunter BIden's dick.

1
MustBeTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut the fuck up StarQueer.

You can make your point without writing like you're role playing as a top secret agent.

-5
JackLemon -5 points ago +1 / -6

Smooth brained morons and NeverTrumpers trying to tie the proven QAnon fraud to this site.

-2
Dr0neRec0very -2 points ago +2 / -4

Q is always supportive of President Trump and always MAGA. Not sure what you're crying about here.

0
eagleeyeddjt 0 points ago +1 / -1

Q never mentions Jesus Christ. He mentions God all the time, but never Christ. Makes you think.

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

I mean, what could be more "friendly" than accusing millions of Q folks of being anti-Christian. Pretty fuckin' friendly, right, Mitt? :D

0
eagleeyeddjt 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are such a boomer moron.

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

hahaha Loser.

-2
Dr0neRec0very -2 points ago +1 / -3

"Makes you think" Yea, it makes me think you're a bigot, with no room for anyone but your own particular church. Right? Right. I've heard President Trump, on a number of occasions, reaching out to ALL religions, even the kind that are too bigoted to cope with each other. Does President Trump try to alienate some religion over another? NOPE! So why would you expect that behavior from Q? Makes you think.

0
eagleeyeddjt 0 points ago +1 / -1

Wow, you are really unfriendly and I don't like you. Blocked

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

"you are really unfriendly" I know... :( Years of dealing with safe space crybabies made me this way. :( xD

0
eagleeyeddjt 0 points ago +1 / -1

What. an. incel. fag.

-1
Dr0neRec0very -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Wow, you are really unfriendly" lol I think reddit is still over there somewhere if you need a tissue or something.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
9
Rufus_Shinra 9 points ago +9 / -0

Twitter and associated social media platforms are the modern incarnation of the Stasi, secret police of communist nations to keep people in line. Instead of giving people beatings to silence them, they simply censor on social media, which has become the new public forum of our time.

Make no mistake, the leftist communist Democrats intend to use social media and mainstream media to control the flow if information permanently for every single person in the country. If they are allowed to continue, the next step will be shutting down sites like this one, for whatever reasons they want.

105
ImpeachImpaired 105 points ago +105 / -0

Publisher not a platform.

-22
Grond999 -22 points ago +13 / -35

Nah...just a BOSS company that does what it pleases in the face of toothless RepubliCANTs.

7
ImpeachImpaired 7 points ago +7 / -0

We need lawsuits and this in front of a judge to look at section 230 definitions and determine if they meet the definition of Platforms

2
Grond999 2 points ago +2 / -0

It should of happened after Trump was elected. We all knew this playbook years ago. Anyone who is informed knows it.

88
thistlemitten 88 points ago +89 / -1

How the Hell are they getting away with all of this? I mean, yes, Section 230, but they are so brazen it's like they are blatantly inviting their own destruction.

73
Almagest 73 points ago +73 / -0

My guess is the middle / upper management making these calls aren't Americans

32
BeefyBelisarius 32 points ago +32 / -0

So, next term we're getting section 230 reform, antitrust suits, and H1B reform? They're practically begging for it at this point. Anyone over here on a visa who is censoring Americans has to go back.

20
deleted 20 points ago +21 / -1
4
SHALL_NOT 4 points ago +4 / -0

My guess is that ccp has threatened to shut down their operations in China. They don’t even need bribery or extortion with big tech, their population of users does that.

2
RandallRaines 2 points ago +2 / -0

That Veritas drop with the twitter indian explaining his hamfisted moral censorship really drove this home. Call your congressmen and ask them why we're permitting H1B foreigners in any position to dictate what speech we're allowed to express.

23
randomusename 23 points ago +23 / -0

They do whatever they want, then go before congress and have no consequences, so they keep doing whatever the fuck they want.

4
N900mixalot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rinse, repeat

22
grapenuts 22 points ago +22 / -0

it all boils down to monopolistic behavior. Twitter and all the rest can censor to their hearts content because there is no danger of competition. Any competitor using the angle of non-censoring, free speech (think gab) is just banned from the marketplace using a catch all "hate speech" excuse that can mean whatever they want it to mean.

Google, Apple and Microsoft are effectively the gatekeepers of all social media via their app store TOS. And, since it is prohibitively difficult for 99% of people to side load apps, and a smart phone is basically a necessity these days, their restrictive policies on what they allow in their app stores is an abuse of their market position and clear cut monopoly bullshit.

TLDR, Congress needs to go after the app stores and force them to open it up.

3
Friendly_B 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yesssss

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
rp-one 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've wondered about that, its all so blatant... maybe what were seeing is malicious compliance by the compromised people. Or maybe the CCP head calling the shots is just clueless

60
knnbccb 60 points ago +60 / -0

The time for talk and hearings is over.

Section 230 all of them. No exceptions.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +7 / -1

Tick tock. That is the clock ticking on their ability to stay in power. The new MAGA party is starting to pay attention.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
hit_backspace 4 points ago +7 / -3

T_D needs to get the definition of Section 230 right. It's a decade old law that existed way before big tech. It grants these companies total immunity to being sued. What needs to be done is REPEAL Section 230. No one was able to foresee big tech getting as big as they are today. We have to make them liable to be sued for every single one of their regulatory decisions.

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

No what it needs is to be interpreted and enforced properly.

2
RussianAgent13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Incorrect. Without Section 230 ANYONE can be sued for comments posted to their platform. Platforms couldn't be exist. We don't want total immunity either. All we need is strict definitions of what "good faith" and "objectionable content" mean, and a clear delineation between platform and publisher. These are part of the law but have been misinterpreted and not enforced.

I'm fine with replacing it with a better law.

59
m0r1arty 59 points ago +59 / -0

Twitter is stopping a government official from talking about their work publicly?

I don't even think the best lawyers could manage to tilt this favourably.

-13
deleted -13 points ago +2 / -15
5
RussianAgent13 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're arguing that they are a private entity that can delete or post whatever content they see fit? Fine, then they are a publisher and liable to be sued for any defamatory comments or illegal material anyone posts on their site.

3
m0r1arty 3 points ago +3 / -0

A worker who is paid for with taxpayer money is censored from talking about his job by a non-governmental entity who allows others to do exactly that in every other case?

I think this non-governmental entity, and you, needs to understand that it is breaking the law here by granting some rights to one and not to another.

47
AlphaNathan 47 points ago +48 / -1

Twitter, meet Streisand: https://twitter.com/CBPMarkMorgan

6
Trump_Train 6 points ago +6 / -0

Following!

4
DeadOverRed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Streisand stops working when there's nowhere else to spread the message.

42
Almagest 42 points ago +42 / -0

Twitter censors the US government but allows foreign world leaders, often terrorists, to spout whatever threats of violence and actual hatred they wish.

Twitter is a foreign actor and should be treated as such.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
4
Wtf_socialismreally 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did he? I missed that. May have to clap.

12
victory2024 12 points ago +12 / -0

"Who the hell elected you" or something. Pretty mild stuff really.

2
Wtf_socialismreally 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dammit Ted, drop the F bombs.

2
artifex_mundi_x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ted Cruz did well. He got Dorsey caught up in a lie and then twitter was finally forced to uncensor the NYP article. So he got something done. He also called them a Democrat super PAC, which is good to put on the record.

2
Grond999 2 points ago +3 / -1

Pussy go grrrrrrrr

30
ERIC_CIARAMELLA 30 points ago +30 / -0

Didn't Jack just lie to congress yesterday about why they censor folks?

Why didn't congress say "you won't do this shit again"?

President Trump should shut them down, even for the LOLs.

24
side_o_beef 24 points ago +24 / -0

Because Congress is a bunch of bitches. I would lie to them too. What are they even going to do? They don’t have teeth.

14
MagaChamp253 14 points ago +14 / -0

oh they absolutely have teeth. for little shts like us. not for the trillion dollar boys in the 'Power Club'. who wants to bet that all these big tech companies have made it known they have mountains of dirt on every one of them and have told them to stfu...?

7
Wtf_socialismreally 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you lied to them, CNN would camp outside your house in anticipation of the armed FBI raid.

4
side_o_beef 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very easily fixed. Put “democrat” and a pronouns section on your twitter bio. They’ll be like “ah this xir is one of us”

5
ca18det 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Patroit Act gives the President the power to sieze Twitter. I believe big tech will foment open insurrection with groups and arming revolutionaries. This will be the justification to invoke Insurrection Act while using their evil Patriot Act tools against them.

Bonus points if this action is so unpopular it resulted in the Patriot Act being revoked.

2
ERIC_CIARAMELLA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Win-win.

Fuckin' 4D chess, man.

3
RussianAgent13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Arrest Jack for Contempt of Congress on election day.

25
magnokor 25 points ago +25 / -0

Only two choices.

Silicon Valley is a foreign group conducting a war on the USA.

Silicon Valley is a domestic terror group waging war on the elected President of the USA and the US government and citizens.

22
LibertyStillMatters 22 points ago +22 / -0

They don’t fear any repercussions. This is on our politicians. Big tech is flaunting censorship and speech suppression and daring US politicians to do something. What I saw from the hearings yesterday was apathy and a ‘couldn’t be bothered’ frame of mind from Dorsey, Zuckerberg and the other tyrant. They even lied straight to the faces of senators in a hearing. Everyone applauds Cruz for what he said, but talk is cheap.

8
NOTWOKE 8 points ago +8 / -0

bUT muH aLGorYthS kEeP MaKIng MisTKeS.

21
Freadrik 21 points ago +22 / -1

Let me guess, Tucker will have a segment on it, Lindsey Graham will send a letter, you guys will jerk off to a comment Ted “the Sheep” Cruz makes and....nothing will fucking happen.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
1
Santa_Liqueur 1 point ago +1 / -0

What the fuck would an Republican Party do if they actually fought back? Can’t resist if you’ve solved the problem.

It’s the same as the NRA, which is perfectly happy taking your money and giving it directly to Wayne LaPierre, instead of actually doing anything. What good is a gun rights org if we have gun rights?

20
JohnMcCainsTumors 20 points ago +22 / -2

It's time to physically do something

16
deleted 16 points ago +18 / -2
11
BeefyBelisarius 11 points ago +11 / -0

Nothing physical aside from self defense until the 4th. Otherwise you'll scare newly converted moderate Trump voters away.

6
thuggishruggishtrump 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's obvious people here don't get it, yeah let's just round up and arrest everyone 5 days before a presidential election, that'll totally work in Trump's favor /s

Come the fuck on people, I thought you were smarter than this.

4
BeefyBelisarius 4 points ago +4 / -0

I suspect there's a lot of well-meaning, frustrated patriots who aren't thinking things through, and a handful of glowies egging them on.

1
DeadOverRed 1 point ago +3 / -2

Exactly. Let's just stay in our basements until they go from censorship to concentration camps, then get on the trains peacefully.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +7 / -1

Your take is wrong on this. Something needs to be done. Not enough people will stop to impact this.

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
5
tufftoffee 5 points ago +5 / -0

If most people use Facebook and Twitter and Google what use is free choice then? They are public squares. We already have "alternatives" but if people don't use them except for fringe groups they don't count.

Especially if they are censored. Where have you been?

Regardless they shouldn't be doing this and we shouldn't have to switch to another platform. They are censoring the news and US government for fucks sake.

How about Google? Core search tech is locked by them so other search engines can't compete at a level competent enough to be a true rival. Everything is just a roundabout way of googling!

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
booblitchutz 1 point ago +2 / -1

I use Parler. I’m not like crazy active on it because I didn’t really like Twit very much either. But I have it and I’ll hop on it.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
tufftoffee 3 points ago +3 / -0

With all the propaganda and subversion the last few years do you really think the left isn't? Did you think the Red Scare was a farce too? Why do you think we are against communists?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
Santa_Liqueur 2 points ago +2 / -0

we have a free market

Tell that to Hatreon, Gab, and every other alt-tech platform that’s been brigades, had their funding platforms cancelled, payment processors removed, and search results quashed.

This is anything but a free market, and Big Tech is working hard to be sure it stays that way.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
Keiichi81 12 points ago +12 / -0

When Iran's leader calls Jews "a cancer" and promises that Israel will be "destroyed", that's just saber rattling and not a violation of our rules against promoting hate. When Trump says "I can send in the National Guard to end these riots instantly if Democrat governors would just ask," that's glorifying violence and so we had to censor his posts.

It's like they're not even trying to mask their bias. Not surprising, considering they've been called before Congress, what...like three times now, and absolutely fuck all has been done to them despite being caught in multiple lies?

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
11
Pixel 11 points ago +11 / -0

Keep digging yourself a whole for when section 230 protections are stripped...

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Santa_Liqueur 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s absolutely no way they can afford to manually review content at that scale. That’s a ludicrous claim.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
10
JohnMcCainsTumors 10 points ago +12 / -2

I had a dream about 10,000 of us went to Twitter headquarters locked all the doors and let the building on fire with everyone inside

4
ShakeNBake 4 points ago +6 / -2

Might need to happen. We are rapidly losing our freedoms due to big tech

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
tehkelso 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've had this same dream but it's CNN.

1
plaaaa 1 point ago +1 / -0

FreeLauraLoomer

1
orange_dit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sheep can be replaced. It won't solve anything.

1
tufftoffee 1 point ago +1 / -0

BLM? Is that you?

4
Necrovoter 4 points ago +4 / -0

B52 Bombers could fix them with a couple of sorties. With a pylon upgrade, each B52 could carry a GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) and 2 MOABS.

4
BoffoTheClown 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lead poisoning?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
10
MenicusMoldbug 10 points ago +10 / -0

There is no doubt that these people are our enemies.

They are enemies to our families.

They are enemies to our way of life.

They are enemies to our country.

9
Trump_USA_2020 9 points ago +9 / -0

There is no difference between the USA and China.

We are living under a communist regime all the same.

We have no freedom of speech.

Our communist dictators are the Democrat Party, their Chinese backers, and the executives at Big Tech, and the soyboy/snowflake bitchy millennials working for these Democrat agents in big technology companies.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
6
MustafaJones 6 points ago +6 / -0

So Twitter is censoring a government official celebrating enforcing the law? What’s next they censor police for arresting criminals?

3
tufftoffee 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm waiting for it lol.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
cook_does 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its official. Liberals are outdated and obsolete. Its now the Technocrats, they are just moving into the empty shell that is the aborted fetus of the DNC.

6
lash 6 points ago +6 / -0

BORDER

LINES

MATTER!

6
DeadOverRed 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let's skip the regulation and go straight to an enemy of the state declaration.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
1776er 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are growing bolder because their actions remain unpunished

5
DJT_MFer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Ahhhhh, The Homeless One strikes again!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
AnthraciteCracker 5 points ago +5 / -0

Censorship... nose ring protruding... disgusting, very disrespectful.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Thedaythe_redditdied 4 points ago +4 / -0

Arrest @jack

4
Skywise 4 points ago +4 / -0
  1. Stop using Twitter, Facebook and Google (yeah I’m preaching to the choir here)

  2. It’s time for us in the tech community to come together and build the internet and products as WE want it to be. Like schools, like Hollywood and now the internet we’ve ceded the ground to the communists for too long. It’s time to build our own businesses and platforms. You have to fight to keep Liberty. You have to fight to keep a Republic. You have to fight for justice.

4
Light_HIV_Effect 4 points ago +4 / -0

Trump has got to win. I believe he's waiting for the election to be over to drop the hammer on this crap, otherwise he'll be accused of trying to influence the election (which is funny because Twitter itself says it can't influence elections) or running distractions because "hE's bEhInD iN tHe PoLLS!"

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
4
Dalewyn 4 points ago +4 / -0

At what fucking point do we finally just burn Twitter (and really the entire social media apparatus, but one step at a time) to the ground and salt the remains so nothing will grow back in its place?

I don't care what the guy said, government officials and public servants should never be censored in any fucking way. Much less censored by a group led by some lunatic neckbeard who hasn't showered in months.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
orange_dit 4 points ago +4 / -0

You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, serious disease, drug smuggling, raping or murdering

Well it's in their terms so I guess they did the right thing in removing it

/s

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Mooma 4 points ago +4 / -0

Need a law prevent foreign nationals from shutting down the free speech of us citizens. An anti-propaganda law. Because most of online censoring is run foreign governments. We can't let them use our constitution to take us down.

3
Jimmy_Russler 3 points ago +3 / -0

commies censor another u.s. official

Its all so tiring

3
chimerapills 3 points ago +4 / -1

The end or rebirth of America is here lads. I don't doubt Trump will take on big tech next term.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
Liawatha 3 points ago +3 / -0

President Trump should just strip Twatters 230th already.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
NobodyLikesSplatter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get along just fine without all those stupid fucking sites. And I still have friends and family.

3
LOLFuckReddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Don’t worry out justice department will take care of this in 12 years.

2
CornPopvotesTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im no Dorsey defender or anything you can tell he lets others do his girlfriend but i get the feeling his company is balls deep with the deep state and he has lost control over it.

2
Anyslogan2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twitter needs to be taken down.