That post is for members only. I would suggest that being a member of a group whose goal seems to be to justify their denial of the truth makes you equivalent to . . . a Demonrat.
So your argument is that there were no prophets, no true prophecies? I mean, you're not the first to make that argument. In fact, you're in the company of almost everyone seeking to deny the truth. Jesus quoted Daniel, called Himself God, and performed miracles witnessed by thousands.
I go back to my original point- keep looking at the evidence, and make your own decision. The "God made everything, then disappeared" argument doesn't make any sense to me given the evidence.
If you don't believe the internal evidence of the Bible, I suggest starting with the external evidence. The accuracy of 66 books written by dozens of authors over a long period of time is remarkable. Most authors can't keep their story straight over a trilogy, and that's with the same guy writing it.
Why look at only some of the evidence? The universe says there is a God. The prophecies and witnesses say He came to us.
https://ehrmanblog.org/the-first-apocalypse-the-book-of-daniel/ those are fake too.
That post is for members only. I would suggest that being a member of a group whose goal seems to be to justify their denial of the truth makes you equivalent to . . . a Demonrat.
https://ttb.org/docs/default-source/notes-outlines/no19_daniel.pdf
https://findingtruth.info/2012/02/28/skeptical-bible-study-daniel-intro/
https://infidels.org/library/modern/chris_sandoval/daniel.html
So your argument is that there were no prophets, no true prophecies? I mean, you're not the first to make that argument. In fact, you're in the company of almost everyone seeking to deny the truth. Jesus quoted Daniel, called Himself God, and performed miracles witnessed by thousands.
I go back to my original point- keep looking at the evidence, and make your own decision. The "God made everything, then disappeared" argument doesn't make any sense to me given the evidence.
If you don't believe the internal evidence of the Bible, I suggest starting with the external evidence. The accuracy of 66 books written by dozens of authors over a long period of time is remarkable. Most authors can't keep their story straight over a trilogy, and that's with the same guy writing it.