This whole thread is a beauty, folks. It really is a joy for me to see so many people on the same page with how false our scientific authority puppets have become.
Seriously though, all science are just models of some process and they're all wrong, but some have more supporting evidence than others. So you choose which model you believe in and from what we've seen, people including the "experts" will often choose the one that's expedient to them.
You started with “technically...” in jest, but it’s a key part of that statement.
The idea that ‘science is just models all the way down’ is an academic philosophical axiom, only relevant at the extreme ends of the scales of application, like ‘space and time are the same thing”, ‘words have no real meanings’ and “numbers are a theory without discrete value”.
Practically speaking, it is easy to distinguish proof from lack of proof using evidence. Pushing academic technicalities is for thought experiments and neomarxists.
No, I come from the perspective of my understanding of physics. Practically Newtonian physics describes the behavior of objects well up to certain scales and speeds, but then it breaks down which is why we need Quantum Mechanics and Relativity which has real world implications such as in GPS satellites.
"Numbers are a theory without discrete value", not exactly sure what you mean by this, but if you take irrational numbers for example, they don't have a discrete value and we can only approximately represent them and yet we use them all the time in nearly everything.
That’s my point: GPS satellites are an ‘extreme end of the scale’ use case — moving faster than a speeding bullet, literally out of this world. If you were in a car accident and the other driver tried to use quantum mechanics to argue about the boundary layer of his bumper or Relativity to argue that he wasn’t speeding, it would be ridiculous.
Similarly, a person trying to argue about incommensurable numbers would be making an absurd argument in a real-world estate distribution of assets.
Yet we see this silly type of thinking used to escape accounting for clear evidence that disproves politically-correct ‘consensus science’ every day.
So they already corrupted and killed ‘science’ aka scientific method and replaced it with a new religion ‘Science’ which is basically where a priestly class of ‘experts’ , who are agents of the state, tell everyone how to live their lives, down to the smallest detail
Ah, you've been around. I was there when they said the earth would be frozen solid by now, but that wouldn't be a problem because we all would have starved to death before then.
BTW I'm a scientist, engineer, and attorney. Those Leftists are full of shit and so are the so-called scientists who lie like dogs to get more money and self importance.
Real science is a process of having a hypothesis, testing that hypothesis, and publishing your findings and procedures so someone else can come behind you and verify that what you did was sound and if your conclusion holds up. What these people are preaching is a secular dogma and they don’t even realize it.
Nah they are even dumber than that they actually believe "he just said that to limit supply so they wouldn't run out like they did with toilet paper.."
Oh so they we're cool with people spreading it and didn't trust that they could make their own then huh?
Dumb. Asses.
MASKS ARE A SHAM. MASKS ARE FOR SLAVES. REBEL AGAISNT MASKS
I trust a magic 8 ball more than I trust experts at this point. At least a magic 8 ball isn’t seeking to drive the heel of its boot into my face every time it gives an answer.
He who pays the piper calls the tune. All too often experts will either skew what they present to curry favor or the powerful just keep looking for the right experts. And it’s all over the map across politics. Remember how long the dispute about smoking and cancer went (we know it’s not good, but we still can’t say who will suffer horrible diseases).
The temperature stopped rising around 2000. At first they ignored it, then when they had to admit it, they called it “the pause” - a subtle linguistic trick to make it sound like they were still right, we just had to wait for it to “unpause”. Then people started asking why these so-called “climate scientists” were producing computer models that got it so wrong. So they changed their argument and said the warming was still there, but it just went to the ocean. So actual scientists said great, that means if we measure the temperature of the ocean, we will be able to track the rate of warming. But ocean temperatures hadn’t gone up either, so the climate scientists said ackhtually, the warming went straight to the bottom of the ocean, in the deepest most unexplored parts, where you cannot actually measure. And that continues to be their explanation today. The warming went to the bottom of the ocean, and somehow did so without warming the surface area where the temperature could actually be measured.
Even if the temperature does have gone up, human activities have nothing to do with that. No government gets to tell mother earth how to behave. I believe in cliamate change - as it always changes, just not the man made part!
This is a religion that has nothing to do with real pollution. Just like whiteness is your new original sin in the religion of intersectionality, breathing out carbon dioxide is your new original sin according to the church of climate change. You're duped if you take their crap seriously.
As someone who has had a heavy interest in science my entire life, and even worked on an R&D project at one point and shot lasers at things and read spectrographs, etc, etc...
What in the hell does "I believe in science" even mean?
“I blindly accept any propaganda the political class, intelligence agencies, and pharmaceutical industry funnel through the corporate media and call “science”.
For decades now, the Communist Democrat Party has paid off Scientists through Grants, etc., to report fake statistics to match the outcomes they wanted. Climate Change/Global Warming being one of them. When the Republicans countered with proof/facts - they were labeled Science Deniers. Apparently this is good enough for the low info Sheep who willingly follow and believe everything if it comes from a Democrat. The easy phrase now being "I believe in Science"...
He uses science every day! Such as the technology in his teleprompter, the drugs keeping him awake durring his boring speeches, and the absorbent material in his diaper.
Sure, we all use technology which we don't understand. Typically, though. the science behind the tech is even harder to understand, while the deep nature of science itself (insofar as there is one form) is even harder to grasp.
.
He doesn’t have to understand anything or make any of his own decisions. He’ll just do whatever the “experts” recommend. Critical thinking is lost on the left.
Sure, and just like the faithful who listen to and follow what their priests say but have no understanding of theology. he's ignorant of the limits and problems of science.
Science is always expanding and developing. Every new discovery is an update that challenges the previous knowledge, like there're four stranded DNA in addition to the iconic double helix. Science can tell you what things are and how they work, but it can't tell you what to do. You have to make your own decisions. Nuclear scientists invented and tested the nuclear bomb, but it was president Truman who gave the order to nuke those two cities in Japan, which put an end on WWII and practically prevented all future world wars. That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom. Besides, their "science" is not really science, but a computer model in both COVID and climate change. That's like a man made idol which takes in their tributes of data and gives them false signs of the future.
Not a scientist but I do have a B.S and an M.S which required writing a master's thesis containing a scientific literature review. I would bet that 99% of these "I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE" virtue signaling jackasses have never even read a scientific journal article, let alone done any independent research. They are fucking disgraceful.
I don't think you sound killdozer pissed yet. A week to go, maybe longer before election results are announced and all hell breaks loose. As of 2 days ago 61% of our population that Civil War breaking out within 2 weeks is unavoidable.
You don't "believe" in science. It is opposite of belief. Pseudo science is the post modernist's religion and they don't even understand that simple fact.
There's science, and then there's the left's "science."
Their "science" changes words to fit narratives, such as "sexual preference" and "gender." It also creates inaccurate models that are treated as inevitable. Instead of the scientific method, it accepts simple consensus as good enough.
Really? That implies other people don't love science? Everyone does. Literally everyone.
It's a strawman. It implies Trump folks don't love and engage in it. And while they're hiding global warming stats, encouraging 8 year old sex changes, redefining words (to make people look bad) and ignoring gun control and racial violence stats.... the right isn't.
On Sunday kids go to heaven and are molded to "love" faith. On Monday kids go to hell and are molded to "love" science. Most of the time you can replace faith and science with social justice activism. I once saw a preacher give a sermon on fucking recycling. I also know a 4th grade teacher who teaches their "students" sex ed masquerading as a semester on reproduction and they got teacher of the year for that shit.
It wouldn't bother me if degenerate pieces of shit like Obama and Biden didn't use it every other sentence to try to sound like they aren't psychopaths.
can confirm that's what they do. before i got permabanned for calling kamala and pelosi cunts, every top comment on trump was nothing but blue check marks with tds.
Someone who believes in science wouldn't say "I'm getting rid of oil and fossil fuels", then immediately turn around and say "We're gonna put Plexiglass in all the classrooms"
Science is about being reproduceable, not provable. Although I do feel there's a need for philosophical science that would exclusively create logical frameworks and checks (like the art of checking your work in math).
If you're talking about "believing" in science then you're already wrong. Science describes a process of observing things and drawing conclusions based on those observations. No one objects to scientific inquiry. The objection is to the conclusions based on fraud, groupthink, and nothing observable.
Joe Biden believes in science, but he can barely do any simple business math involving percentages and equity. That's why he needed to hire Bobulinski. People who are as bad at math as Joe Biden actually believe in pseudoscience.
Joe Biden (probably): "Growing up in Scranton as a poor black child, my dad who got fired from a coal mine used to always say at the kitchen table: Son you can always compromise your morals if money is involved. It's that simple folks. That's why Hunter's crimes and incest don't matter. It's science, man."
There's a disputable thing with different experts who have varying opinions but if you don't agree with MY experts YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN SCIENCE AT ALL!
Meanwhile, we know President Trump is actually the one tweeting calling Kim short and fat while he’s taking a dump, and brokers peace talks as a result, Hahahaha.
I love having Trump at the reigns of his Twitter and not some focus-group-screened intern bullshit.
Exactly, I can hear Trump’s voice in his tweets. That was really my point for posting this but most people wanted to talk about the science which is fine. Does anyone honestly believe Biden has typed one tweet? His tweets are the most pompous and fake sentences where I guarantee the wording of each is debated on by a group of staffers.
Ah yes, the all holy and unwavering "Science" we should all fully trust and believe in! Because science is never wrong and NEVER changes... right? but ....
Not only do Democrats want to pretend they monopolize science, they want you to believe that it's the most important thing Americans should care about. Why? So that Americans don't protester or question their communist policies in the name of "science".
The left is great at manipulating their base. They put people in lab coats in pedestals and degrade anyone who disagrees with them. They use words like "denier" to make people ashamed to take a stance against popular opinion.
if he believes in science why didnt he check the weather radar before taking the stage tonight?
You're giving the scientists Biden trusts too much credit. According to them, the ice caps shouldve melted 8 years ago.
And then another 8 years before that, and then another 12 before that, and then everything should have frozen over another 12 before that.
Achuchually the ice caps melted so hard they looped all the way around to being frozen again.
Who built the ice caps, Joe?
I lol'd
This whole thread is a beauty, folks. It really is a joy for me to see so many people on the same page with how false our scientific authority puppets have become.
Angry Insider
Me too.
ICE
MAN MADE CLIMATE CHANGE IS GOING TO CAUSE A NEW ICE AGE!
YOU DON’T BELIEVE IN SCIENCE. YOU USE THE SCIENTIFIC PROCESS TO PROVE THINGS, SO THAT YOU DON’T HAVE TO BELIEVE.
And real science brings you closer and closer to the Maker of heaven and earth, not farther away.
That’s the key. They use religious language because CC is a religion.
Came here to say this, except that we cannot PROVE anything with absolute certainty in our modern falsifiable empiricism.
Technically... [insert snooty reddit comment here].
Seriously though, all science are just models of some process and they're all wrong, but some have more supporting evidence than others. So you choose which model you believe in and from what we've seen, people including the "experts" will often choose the one that's expedient to them.
You started with “technically...” in jest, but it’s a key part of that statement.
The idea that ‘science is just models all the way down’ is an academic philosophical axiom, only relevant at the extreme ends of the scales of application, like ‘space and time are the same thing”, ‘words have no real meanings’ and “numbers are a theory without discrete value”.
Practically speaking, it is easy to distinguish proof from lack of proof using evidence. Pushing academic technicalities is for thought experiments and neomarxists.
No, I come from the perspective of my understanding of physics. Practically Newtonian physics describes the behavior of objects well up to certain scales and speeds, but then it breaks down which is why we need Quantum Mechanics and Relativity which has real world implications such as in GPS satellites.
"Numbers are a theory without discrete value", not exactly sure what you mean by this, but if you take irrational numbers for example, they don't have a discrete value and we can only approximately represent them and yet we use them all the time in nearly everything.
That’s my point: GPS satellites are an ‘extreme end of the scale’ use case — moving faster than a speeding bullet, literally out of this world. If you were in a car accident and the other driver tried to use quantum mechanics to argue about the boundary layer of his bumper or Relativity to argue that he wasn’t speeding, it would be ridiculous.
Similarly, a person trying to argue about incommensurable numbers would be making an absurd argument in a real-world estate distribution of assets.
Yet we see this silly type of thinking used to escape accounting for clear evidence that disproves politically-correct ‘consensus science’ every day.
So they already corrupted and killed ‘science’ aka scientific method and replaced it with a new religion ‘Science’ which is basically where a priestly class of ‘experts’ , who are agents of the state, tell everyone how to live their lives, down to the smallest detail
Strange how Obama bought a multimillion dollar beachfront mansion seeing as he thinks it will be underwater in a few years.
Al Gore did the same shit!
Ah, you've been around. I was there when they said the earth would be frozen solid by now, but that wouldn't be a problem because we all would have starved to death before then.
BTW I'm a scientist, engineer, and attorney. Those Leftists are full of shit and so are the so-called scientists who lie like dogs to get more money and self importance.
I can't stand those Solid Earthers
The #1 thing everyone seems to want to ignore on the Left is that Fauci himself literally said there is no reason to be wearing a mask.
How are we supposed to trust the Science, when Fauci, the CDC, the WHO, all were saying different shit at the start of this thing.
LOL!!!!!
TRUST THE SCIENCE.....these people man, I tell ya sometimes.
Real science is a process of having a hypothesis, testing that hypothesis, and publishing your findings and procedures so someone else can come behind you and verify that what you did was sound and if your conclusion holds up. What these people are preaching is a secular dogma and they don’t even realize it.
Scientism.
Exactly.
Even worse than scientology
A cult for the mentally weak and gullible.
Real scientists who've done those heavy lifting are censored!
They love that nifty little “memory hole” don’t they?
Nah they are even dumber than that they actually believe "he just said that to limit supply so they wouldn't run out like they did with toilet paper.."
Oh so they we're cool with people spreading it and didn't trust that they could make their own then huh?
Dumb. Asses.
MASKS ARE A SHAM. MASKS ARE FOR SLAVES. REBEL AGAISNT MASKS
:)
And this is from the same people who were up in arms about Trump DoWnPlAyInG the PaNdEMiC!!!!11!!!1
So it turns out downplaying things to stop mass hysteria is actually a noble thing to do, with a few caveats:
Any downplaying that occurs in the other eleven months, or if it's done by someone aside from Fauci is killing grandma.
🤡 Da Science Is Seddled 🙃
Pretty sure they have filled it up so much that it is now a mountain. With a tower on top of it.
I remember when they merely turned molehills into mountains. This is "progressivism"
I trust a magic 8 ball more than I trust experts at this point. At least a magic 8 ball isn’t seeking to drive the heel of its boot into my face every time it gives an answer.
Biggest lesson and wake up call of 2016 was to never, ever give "experts" the time of day. Their words are worse than useless.
He who pays the piper calls the tune. All too often experts will either skew what they present to curry favor or the powerful just keep looking for the right experts. And it’s all over the map across politics. Remember how long the dispute about smoking and cancer went (we know it’s not good, but we still can’t say who will suffer horrible diseases).
I love watching TV shows from the 90s.
It’s always “global warming” and never referred to as “climate change”.
Then suddenly “global warming” wasn’t the issue, just “climate change”- a catch-all term that could be applied to any weather event.
Well played, globalists.
Fall is turning into winter. A little ahead of schedule.
Climate change!
The temperature stopped rising around 2000. At first they ignored it, then when they had to admit it, they called it “the pause” - a subtle linguistic trick to make it sound like they were still right, we just had to wait for it to “unpause”. Then people started asking why these so-called “climate scientists” were producing computer models that got it so wrong. So they changed their argument and said the warming was still there, but it just went to the ocean. So actual scientists said great, that means if we measure the temperature of the ocean, we will be able to track the rate of warming. But ocean temperatures hadn’t gone up either, so the climate scientists said ackhtually, the warming went straight to the bottom of the ocean, in the deepest most unexplored parts, where you cannot actually measure. And that continues to be their explanation today. The warming went to the bottom of the ocean, and somehow did so without warming the surface area where the temperature could actually be measured.
Calling any of this “science” is a stretch and a half.
Shame most lay-peoples knowledge of climate change consists of propaganda on the TV.
Even if the temperature does have gone up, human activities have nothing to do with that. No government gets to tell mother earth how to behave. I believe in cliamate change - as it always changes, just not the man made part!
This is a religion that has nothing to do with real pollution. Just like whiteness is your new original sin in the religion of intersectionality, breathing out carbon dioxide is your new original sin according to the church of climate change. You're duped if you take their crap seriously.
Floods, fires, famine - They’ve claimed them all. Ridiculous bullshit.
I remember when "Global Cooling" was a thing...
Global Warming sounded more dangerous :)
Not to mention plate tectonics
As someone who has had a heavy interest in science my entire life, and even worked on an R&D project at one point and shot lasers at things and read spectrographs, etc, etc...
What in the hell does "I believe in science" even mean?
“I blindly accept any propaganda the political class, intelligence agencies, and pharmaceutical industry funnel through the corporate media and call “science”.
This is the Way.
I just want to say that was a beautifully typed sentence. :)
mindlessly following whatever scientists say regardless of how flawed or questionable their studies/funding are
For decades now, the Communist Democrat Party has paid off Scientists through Grants, etc., to report fake statistics to match the outcomes they wanted. Climate Change/Global Warming being one of them. When the Republicans countered with proof/facts - they were labeled Science Deniers. Apparently this is good enough for the low info Sheep who willingly follow and believe everything if it comes from a Democrat. The easy phrase now being "I believe in Science"...
It means there is a cash grab available.
Following the orthodoxy of communist authoritarianism because people cannot make good decisions by themselves.
Can't wait for him to blame that on climate change.
I think people were blaming Climate Change for Covid months ago.
97% of rain scientists agree.
Hhhahaaaa!
Uncle Joe may believe is science, but doesn't understand what it is.
He uses science every day! Such as the technology in his teleprompter, the drugs keeping him awake durring his boring speeches, and the absorbent material in his diaper.
What about adsorbents ?
An absorbent absorbs a liquid or gas into a volume, while an adsorbent adsorbs a liquid or gas onto a solid surface.
An example of an absorbent would be a napkin, cloth, or a towel.
An adsorbent would be those little packets of silica that say "do not eat" that come in things. Or a molecular sieve, like clay pellets.
Desiccants can be either, but yes, generally adsorbents are used.
Doesn't carry nearly as much water
Lemon is my favorite flavor.
Great, underrated word!
Sure, we all use technology which we don't understand. Typically, though. the science behind the tech is even harder to understand, while the deep nature of science itself (insofar as there is one form) is even harder to grasp. .
I unnerstand all the technicals perfectly; little gremlins type out what I write here on your side of the screen, then you can read it.
This is why Jim Crow Joe isn't allowed to say anything that hasn't been scripted by his puppet masters first, that's the sort of shit he'd be spewing.
Or understand how to change his Depends. That job is for Hunta!!!!
He doesn’t have to understand anything or make any of his own decisions. He’ll just do whatever the “experts” recommend. Critical thinking is lost on the left.
Right, but only the properly anointed experts!
No he doesn't. He WORSHIPs science, so do many other democrats. To them, the lab coats are not scientists. They are priests.
Sure, and just like the faithful who listen to and follow what their priests say but have no understanding of theology. he's ignorant of the limits and problems of science.
Science is always expanding and developing. Every new discovery is an update that challenges the previous knowledge, like there're four stranded DNA in addition to the iconic double helix. Science can tell you what things are and how they work, but it can't tell you what to do. You have to make your own decisions. Nuclear scientists invented and tested the nuclear bomb, but it was president Truman who gave the order to nuke those two cities in Japan, which put an end on WWII and practically prevented all future world wars. That's the difference between knowledge and wisdom. Besides, their "science" is not really science, but a computer model in both COVID and climate change. That's like a man made idol which takes in their tributes of data and gives them false signs of the future.
And above all, science is a human endeavor, and humans are fallible.
Pisses me off as a scientist.
Wait, you guys aren't a party?
Partisan science. Pretty sure that's what the scientific method is all about.
The science of turning the US into an idiocracy.
Not a scientist but I do have a B.S and an M.S which required writing a master's thesis containing a scientific literature review. I would bet that 99% of these "I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE" virtue signaling jackasses have never even read a scientific journal article, let alone done any independent research. They are fucking disgraceful.
It’s both cringey and ridiculous at the same time.
Especially when most of the people who say it are so ignorant about basic science.
Science says there are only 2 genders, every cell in a man and women's body are stamped uniquely male or female.
Democrats are science deniers.
Does science weigh in on 2 scoops and 2 terms?
I don't think you sound killdozer pissed yet. A week to go, maybe longer before election results are announced and all hell breaks loose. As of 2 days ago 61% of our population that Civil War breaking out within 2 weeks is unavoidable.
You don't "believe" in science. It is opposite of belief. Pseudo science is the post modernist's religion and they don't even understand that simple fact.
There's science, and then there's the left's "science."
Their "science" changes words to fit narratives, such as "sexual preference" and "gender." It also creates inaccurate models that are treated as inevitable. Instead of the scientific method, it accepts simple consensus as good enough.
And they're perfectly fine with that.
This pede gets epistemology
ALL HAIL THE TECHNO TECHNO POPE!
you dare deny techno-science?!
That must be how black people feel when white people try to sound "cool" around them.
The "I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE" stuff is so cringe.
Really? That implies other people don't love science? Everyone does. Literally everyone.
It's a strawman. It implies Trump folks don't love and engage in it. And while they're hiding global warming stats, encouraging 8 year old sex changes, redefining words (to make people look bad) and ignoring gun control and racial violence stats.... the right isn't.
They're despicable! (Keeping it in the Looney Toons lingo)
When your scientific knowledge doesn’t extend beyond Bill Nye the Science Guy and Neil DeGrasse Tyson
On Sunday kids go to heaven and are molded to "love" faith. On Monday kids go to hell and are molded to "love" science. Most of the time you can replace faith and science with social justice activism. I once saw a preacher give a sermon on fucking recycling. I also know a 4th grade teacher who teaches their "students" sex ed masquerading as a semester on reproduction and they got teacher of the year for that shit.
It's idolatry, plain and simple. They don't know jack about science.
This is it
And when does life begin, Joe?
Cringe. I really wish "folks" would go away. Folk is plural.
"Folks" is as American as baseball caps and not giving a shit about soccer. "Folk" is British.
Kek
That’s all folks!
Ah-deet-bahdee
As someone who uses "folks" I deeply apologize, no one ever corrected me until now :(
It wouldn't bother me if degenerate pieces of shit like Obama and Biden didn't use it every other sentence to try to sound like they aren't psychopaths.
Funny enough it's a dead giveaway.
Obama's entire relatability => saying "folks"
Beer summit
they're not bad folks folks
It's so obvious Twatter nerfs Trumps likes ratio with Bidens numbers like that.
Guarantee they bump all positive replies towards the top whereas all of the top replies to Trumps tweets are blue check marks with TDS
can confirm that's what they do. before i got permabanned for calling kamala and pelosi cunts, every top comment on trump was nothing but blue check marks with tds.
They probably just add a default 200k likes to everything Biden posts.
Trump has 80 million followers and his best tweets get 150,000. There's just no way that's possible without Twitter suppression.
Someone who believes in science wouldn't say "I'm getting rid of oil and fossil fuels", then immediately turn around and say "We're gonna put Plexiglass in all the classrooms"
Oy, do you have a loicense for that there logical conclusion?
watch it cunt ahve ye got a loicense for checking loicenses?
Oops, I'm busted! I think we'll be challenging the authority of government Officials like this sooner than we expect
Political science and applied science are two completely different fields!
Well yea, well just buy it from China
Says the guy who wants tranny EIGHT year olds.
Eight year olds, Dude
Jesus...
Science is not to be “believed” it is to be “proven” and “understood”
These people do not have religion, so they are trying to make science fill the void in their souls that religion should be occupying.
The problem is when you treat science like religion, it is no longer science. And when you treat religion like science, it is no longer religion.
It's almost like science and religion are two different endeavors, not in contradiction with each other
Science is about being reproduceable, not provable. Although I do feel there's a need for philosophical science that would exclusively create logical frameworks and checks (like the art of checking your work in math).
Hunter likes to fill his soul with crack.
If you're talking about "believing" in science then you're already wrong. Science describes a process of observing things and drawing conclusions based on those observations. No one objects to scientific inquiry. The objection is to the conclusions based on fraud, groupthink, and nothing observable.
Incest is only an idea!
SAVAGE!
Upvote
Science is racist.
It's a whole spectrum! A spectrum of gender!
He also believes in touching and smelling children, so..
Ya'll come back now, ya hear?
Soda.
If they "believe" that makes it a belief system just like religion.
They can go get it now by moving to Poohville.
"We choose truth over facts!"
~Joe Biden
Today I saw a Biden yard sign that said they choose truth over fiction.
Pissed me off but I wanted to remove sign and/or owner, yet refrained.
There is a limit to this malarkey!
Joe Biden believes in science, but he can barely do any simple business math involving percentages and equity. That's why he needed to hire Bobulinski. People who are as bad at math as Joe Biden actually believe in pseudoscience.
That's because he can only count up to a thousand million billion.
Joe Biden (probably): "Growing up in Scranton as a poor black child, my dad who got fired from a coal mine used to always say at the kitchen table: Son you can always compromise your morals if money is involved. It's that simple folks. That's why Hunter's crimes and incest don't matter. It's science, man."
Hey Joe, Beau thought you were a bad father.
SCIENCE says there are only 2 GENDERS
There's a disputable thing with different experts who have varying opinions but if you don't agree with MY experts YOU DON'T BELIEVE IN SCIENCE AT ALL!
Th..th..th...that's all folks!
LOOK
Meanwhile, we know President Trump is actually the one tweeting calling Kim short and fat while he’s taking a dump, and brokers peace talks as a result, Hahahaha.
I love having Trump at the reigns of his Twitter and not some focus-group-screened intern bullshit.
Exactly, I can hear Trump’s voice in his tweets. That was really my point for posting this but most people wanted to talk about the science which is fine. Does anyone honestly believe Biden has typed one tweet? His tweets are the most pompous and fake sentences where I guarantee the wording of each is debated on by a group of staffers.
I worked on a local campaign...NO politicians tweet their own tweets. They might approve it, but staffers write them. Personal experience.
As if "science" is a singular blanket thing to be "believed" or not. Insanity.
So Joe believes in only two genders then, eh!?
Science like only two genders you commie fucks?
Scientism. Disgusting. Cant be more evil
Billions of dollars to the CDC, the World Health Org, and the FDA, and all they come up with is wear a mask.
Hurray fuckin science.
They also came up with “No need to wear a mask”.
I'll fix this.
Takes off his mask.
Coughs into hand.
Everytime 😂
Folks, your 8 year boy is a girl.
Ah yes, the all holy and unwavering "Science" we should all fully trust and believe in! Because science is never wrong and NEVER changes... right? but ....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superseded_theories_in_science#Superseded_theories
hmmm???
Not only do Democrats want to pretend they monopolize science, they want you to believe that it's the most important thing Americans should care about. Why? So that Americans don't protester or question their communist policies in the name of "science".
The left is great at manipulating their base. They put people in lab coats in pedestals and degrade anyone who disagrees with them. They use words like "denier" to make people ashamed to take a stance against popular opinion.
His disgusting rat partner 0bama was big on the "folks" thing also. Puke.
Also believes an 8 year old can choose to undergo gender hormone therapy.....because 'science'
Muh science.
CORRECTION:
Joe Biden: I believe in pseudoscience. Donald Trump: I believe in the statistics and my advisers. It's that simple, folks. C'mon, man.
Why the fuck not?
Democraps only believe in the science that was funded by globalist. Dont fall for their bullshit. Green energy, Muh science.
8-year-olds boys can magically become girls and vice versa... SCIENCE, C'mon
Hey Joe, how many genders are there?
Science says it's a baby. I say, C'mon folks, murder it anyway! - Biden
So he believes in theories and hypothesis that seem to be proved wrong every 100 years or so.
Is science in the room with us, Joe?
If the loony dems believed in science, no one would be wearing masks.