Rather than a sting operation i think it was meant as a distraction.
If i had a lot of incriminating evidence on someone influential i would send it in the most secure way, have a trusted person deliver it personally and have some other, more public, way of transport take the limelight.
Imo, it just so happened that UPS did have someone intercept it and this became an "unplanned" trap, or maybe it was planned as a trap without puting the evidence at risk.
Yep they have "legal" access into UPS, that`s why UPS "can't" answer.
The agencies have been accused of intercepting routers in shipment and tampering with them, restore the factory seal, send them on.
Rather than a sting operation i think it was meant as a distraction.
If i had a lot of incriminating evidence on someone influential i would send it in the most secure way, have a trusted person deliver it personally and have some other, more public, way of transport take the limelight.
Imo, it just so happened that UPS did have someone intercept it and this became an "unplanned" trap, or maybe it was planned as a trap without puting the evidence at risk.