All the main dems are on the china deals, this was found in the emails, including many with the media.. they are all in on it, that is why they all tried to impeach Trump when he spoke with Ukraine president about the drives
Yeah, this is sort of what I am talking about here. You have two MSM sources connecting Wray to Rosneft, which was known from a couple years ago and reported. Then you have a source from a self-proclaimed "News Site" called EJBNews, which is really just a blog by a guy named Eric Johnathan Brewer. He could be totally legit, but I had a hard time finding out who he is without diving deep.
Where is the connection to Biden? Where is a source document, like emails from the laptop or text messages, or a money trail?
It's beyond obvious that all of these swamp creatures are connected in all kinds of illicit deals, but without primary source evidence, it's just speculation. And speculation doesn't convince anyone.
And all of this comes from a guy named amuse, who doesn't claim to be a journalist and seems to deal in political conspiracies a lot. How do I convince someone with any of this information?
See what I'm saying here? Why should this be stickied when there is no solid information to go on?
Search Hunter Biden Rosneft, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security report on him comes up on Hunters corruption investigation. 87 page report from the US government linking Hunter and the Biden's to Rosneft. Includes the timing of the deal falling through.
The connection to Biden comes from Bobulinsky's interview w/ Tucker. When he was supposed to be rcv'g $ @ Sinohawk from CEFC & the money wasn't coming, he saw a report out of Eastern Europe that CEFC was to buy 14% [B's number] stake in Russian owned (aka Kremlin owned) Rosneft. This spooked B a bit because of the political implications & he reached out to his business partners.
Even though in an email, HB said he was 50% equity holder of CEFC, I think he typo'd if you look at the context of the rest of that email. He was talking about his own company, into which he rcv'd the CEFC transfer that was meant for Sinohawk. It doesn't however, make sense that if he had nothing to do with CEFC, that he was seeking expense reimbursement in that email, from what sounded like CEFC. So his denials of involvement with CEFC in that email were clearly a result of him being spooked by something (maybe info from the family's intel connections to reduce visible connections there).
So Wray's firm is alleged to have represented the Russian gov't energy firm (Rosneft) in their sale of assets to Chinese CCP backed CEFC. A bit crazy for many reasons.
All the main dems are on the china deals, this was found in the emails, including many with the media.. they are all in on it, that is why they all tried to impeach Trump when he spoke with Ukraine president about the drives
Trust me, I believe it. I just think linking to it would be helpful. So we can click on those URLs in the tweets and read the sources.
From the Twitter user's threads:
Yeah, this is sort of what I am talking about here. You have two MSM sources connecting Wray to Rosneft, which was known from a couple years ago and reported. Then you have a source from a self-proclaimed "News Site" called EJBNews, which is really just a blog by a guy named Eric Johnathan Brewer. He could be totally legit, but I had a hard time finding out who he is without diving deep.
Where is the connection to Biden? Where is a source document, like emails from the laptop or text messages, or a money trail?
It's beyond obvious that all of these swamp creatures are connected in all kinds of illicit deals, but without primary source evidence, it's just speculation. And speculation doesn't convince anyone.
And all of this comes from a guy named amuse, who doesn't claim to be a journalist and seems to deal in political conspiracies a lot. How do I convince someone with any of this information?
See what I'm saying here? Why should this be stickied when there is no solid information to go on?
Search Hunter Biden Rosneft, the Senate Committee on Homeland Security report on him comes up on Hunters corruption investigation. 87 page report from the US government linking Hunter and the Biden's to Rosneft. Includes the timing of the deal falling through.
Link is a pdf
https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/download/hsgac-finance-report
The connection to Biden comes from Bobulinsky's interview w/ Tucker. When he was supposed to be rcv'g $ @ Sinohawk from CEFC & the money wasn't coming, he saw a report out of Eastern Europe that CEFC was to buy 14% [B's number] stake in Russian owned (aka Kremlin owned) Rosneft. This spooked B a bit because of the political implications & he reached out to his business partners.
Even though in an email, HB said he was 50% equity holder of CEFC, I think he typo'd if you look at the context of the rest of that email. He was talking about his own company, into which he rcv'd the CEFC transfer that was meant for Sinohawk. It doesn't however, make sense that if he had nothing to do with CEFC, that he was seeking expense reimbursement in that email, from what sounded like CEFC. So his denials of involvement with CEFC in that email were clearly a result of him being spooked by something (maybe info from the family's intel connections to reduce visible connections there).
So Wray's firm is alleged to have represented the Russian gov't energy firm (Rosneft) in their sale of assets to Chinese CCP backed CEFC. A bit crazy for many reasons.
Yeah the part we need is the Biden's trying to sell that company. Past that we easily link Wray to the cover up.
Repeated speculation also produces an information fatigue.
Unless resolutions to those loose ends are provided, people get tired of hearing about stories going no where.
Here's the original article referenced in the tweets. https://archive.vn/aSpzY
Don’t link a CNN article, don’t want to be giving them traffic
CNN: https://archive.fo/pSdzT
EJB News: https://archive.fo/1fZa6
None of that links anything to hunters laptop
The Obama administration didn't "borrow" trillions of dollars from China (and stick the taxpayers with the bill) without strings attached.