4245
Comments (492)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
49
deleted 49 points ago +50 / -1
24
clrdark 24 points ago +24 / -0

Starting about two months ago, there were frantic efforts by the Big Organs of Propaganda and by trolls and bots posting in odd places like gossip columns and tabloids to pre-debunk and pre-discredit The QAnon Conspiracy Theories which assert there is pedophilia and Satanic sacrifices by elites in politics and the entertainment biz.

The media must have received word from the FBI and CIA that the Hunter scandals were about to break.

10
lurkwellmyfriends 10 points ago +10 / -0

1000% this. Everything these evil fucks do is pre-planned and coordinated.

And I can't stop using '1000%' now since watching the Bobulinski interview. Crystal clear. God Bless.

6
Block_Helen 6 points ago +7 / -1

yep. Just like they all started talking about deep fakes all of a sudden. Because there was going to be stuff on them that they were going to claim were deep fakes.

4
ILikeMyBlueCar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not to mention the countless apps that started getting pushed a couple months ago where you can slap your face on any piece of video. Once the floodgates break and the Hunter evidence becomes public knowledge, that will be the next media go-to in order to sedate the willfully ignorant. “Here’s how Joe and Hunter Biden were framed using a .99¢ app.”

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's amazing how stupid people are. Well, maybe it's not that amazing.

2
Smurfection 2 points ago +2 / -0

The moment Obama brought up deep fakes and there was this momentary freak out over them, I figured there was video out there Obama was trying to pre-emptively cover up. The thing is, I still think there is.

0
Block_Helen 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yep.

0
deleted 0 points ago +13 / -13
13
WestCoastG 13 points ago +13 / -0

What did I miss regarding tucker? Last thing I heard was that package was intercepted

11
deleted 11 points ago +15 / -4
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
6
LibertyRose 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah so his Fox News overlords have tried to do a 180 on this story I see.

2
chickyrogue 2 points ago +2 / -0

in tuckers defense these arent emails from wikileaks

this is child trafficking pornography and worse ok cause they have indicated evidence of beatings

this is WAY DARK STUFF

it doesnt leave your mind easily

i did pg research for months and months but the whole PANDA evidence was so dark you just need to break ....

its like researching nxivm for same and then someone shows a photo of desmond is amazings fingertips .... before he became amazing but was pasased like trash

and it breaks your heart

these children are put in a world hurt and damage ....

and you are raising your own .... firewalls arent easy to keep

just saying

2
trump2036 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's right. While hunter and natalie is bad, it has no relevance to the election.

The only thing that matters where joe is concerned is the money laundering and being bought by the ccp.

For that we need forensics on their finances, not dick pics.

2
lurkwellmyfriends 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was definitely wrong on that because it's how the CCP - and others, including our own alphabets - control people. It's a massive destabilization of national security and integrity.

"How can you defeat an enemy when you won't recognize them as an enemy?"

I don't believe Tucker is controlled op, though. Yet. He admitted to Greenwald he was wrong in the past for slavishly defending the alphabets in the past. Hopefully he'll admit he was wrong about this, too, and soon.

5
deleted 5 points ago +10 / -5
9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
Rufus_Shinra 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's because ever since Obama was elected the entire Republican establishment went into controlled opposition mode where they pretend to oppose the communist left but are really just making themselves wealthy off destroying America just like the left.

6
DanIsSwell 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was disappointing. When a lot of talk was going around social media, about Joe publicly molesting girls, Tucker and all of them answered to it, by showing the image of Joe leaning into the red head girl (coons daughter) but they didn’t even show the video, Which would have shown how long he was grabbing her and whispering to her and how uncomfortable she was. They just showed a still image, which didn’t look so bad. Then they showed one more photo of him doing the same to a grown woman. But, why did they leave out the countless other footage, of him feeling up little girls, sniffing and whispering to so many others? We had already been sharing the compilation videos, we know Tucker, Hannity, Laura, all of them fucking saw it, and could have used one of those videos. They made it look like the “creepy Joe” stuff spawned from only 2 questionable instances. They did a huge disservice to the truth.

Also, I won’t forget how they never covered a bit of the pizza gate evidence. Ignored it completely. The only mention of it, was Meagan Kelly, bringing Alefantis on to kiss his ass.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
chickyrogue 4 points ago +4 / -0

tucker has children and they already came after him once and he had to move ...

cut some slack

bobalinski was way credible and the damage is done

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2