4245
Comments (492)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
13
WestCoastG 13 points ago +13 / -0

What did I miss regarding tucker? Last thing I heard was that package was intercepted

11
deleted 11 points ago +15 / -4
11
deleted 11 points ago +12 / -1
5
VinnyMAGA 5 points ago +6 / -1

It seemed genuine. He said Hunter isn't running for president and while everyone expects us to pile on, I won't do it. Joe is where the real story is and that's what I'm sticking to.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
6
LibertyRose 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah so his Fox News overlords have tried to do a 180 on this story I see.

2
VinnyMAGA 2 points ago +3 / -1

He did thank fox Wed. He said a lot of people pressured us not to do this story so thanks for allowing it.

2
chickyrogue 2 points ago +2 / -0

in tuckers defense these arent emails from wikileaks

this is child trafficking pornography and worse ok cause they have indicated evidence of beatings

this is WAY DARK STUFF

it doesnt leave your mind easily

i did pg research for months and months but the whole PANDA evidence was so dark you just need to break ....

its like researching nxivm for same and then someone shows a photo of desmond is amazings fingertips .... before he became amazing but was pasased like trash

and it breaks your heart

these children are put in a world hurt and damage ....

and you are raising your own .... firewalls arent easy to keep

just saying

2
trump2036 2 points ago +2 / -0

He's right. While hunter and natalie is bad, it has no relevance to the election.

The only thing that matters where joe is concerned is the money laundering and being bought by the ccp.

For that we need forensics on their finances, not dick pics.

3
BidensHairyLega 3 points ago +3 / -0

If Joe knew about it then it is relevant.

2
lurkwellmyfriends 2 points ago +2 / -0

He was definitely wrong on that because it's how the CCP - and others, including our own alphabets - control people. It's a massive destabilization of national security and integrity.

"How can you defeat an enemy when you won't recognize them as an enemy?"

I don't believe Tucker is controlled op, though. Yet. He admitted to Greenwald he was wrong in the past for slavishly defending the alphabets in the past. Hopefully he'll admit he was wrong about this, too, and soon.