4840
Comments (356)
sorted by:
324
DefendTheInnocent 324 points ago +326 / -2

When we caught Joe red-handed on video in the Ukraine bribery and extortion, it was reported as a Trump scandal so bad as to require immediate impeachment.

Yes, they would report a Biden victory even in the face of a 50-state sweep, which would encounter technical difficulties, were that to happen.

241
donaldismydad 241 points ago +243 / -2

this, my frens, is where GEOTUS can and should deploy the emergency broadcast system, pushed directly to every phone in america, a selfie of DJT, with his trademark winning smile, and captioned: YOUR FAVORITE PRESIDENT HAS JUST BEEN REEELECTED 45TH POTUS, ENJOY!

92
ClownTamer 92 points ago +92 / -0

Has anyone ever used the Emergency Broadcast system? We didn’t use it during 9/11. We didn’t even use it doing Covid. What the fuck has to happen to use it? Aliens landing?

66
kastmaster2000 66 points ago +66 / -0

I belive an incoming nuclear missle from a foreign country would do the trick.

42
electioninfection 42 points ago +42 / -0

That's true. The Hawaiians would know from a couple years ago. (Or last year??)

18
deleted 18 points ago +19 / -1
13
donaldthrow 13 points ago +13 / -0

Further, modern weapons are largely tactical in nature.

No, most missile-based nukes are in the hundreds of kilotons. Not as big as the multi-megaton air-dropped bombs of the 50's, but much bigger than Hiroshima.

It would be irresponsible not to warn people. Taking cover can save a lot of lives. Obviously not when it's right on top of you, but there are large zones of moderate damage where it can make the difference between life and death. Simply getting away from windows can save a lot of lives and eyes; look at the Russian meteor explosion, where almost every injury was caused by flying glass. And getting any barrier between you and the bomb can protect from thermal radiation burns.

Countries no longer would intend to wipe out an entire city. They would only go for military and political areas.

Lots of military and political targets are in cities, as well as factories which are strategically important in war. And in a full-scale exchange, populations could be targeted as a retaliatory measure.

7
LyinBiden 7 points ago +7 / -0

"Countries no longer would intend to wipe out an entire city. They would only go for military and political areas."

Do you have sources for any of this? I'd be very surprised to see Russia or China pull any punches in a nuclear exchange with the U.S.

Iran, N. Korea, etc. have/would have very small arsenals, so there it makes sense.

2
betterlivinglinux 2 points ago +2 / -0

Back in 2014 I listened to the Army Chief of Staff talk about some of the greatest challenges facing the Army: cutbacks and how to fight in mega cities (over 5 million population). In 2015 early 16 it was war in Syria and a clash with Russia there and North Korea going hot.

Obama talked about how the greatest threat to the country was climate change.

Thank you God and fellow Pedes for President Trump. There are no brakes on this train!!!

2
ChocolateEvryday 2 points ago +3 / -1

Aw, poor NK. Crazy fuckers can't get their shit together.

1
Cutter 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would immediately cause nationwide riots and violence.

Like anyone would notice.

7
Honor+Duty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Or an incoming missile from a non foreign country.

6
Wtf_socialismreally 6 points ago +6 / -0

Swalwell has entered the chat.

5
Mavdick96 5 points ago +5 / -0

*Swallows Well

FTFY Pede

2
DontBeACuck 2 points ago +4 / -2

The hawaiians would know from a couple years ago.

1
magafren 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should read the book Dead Heat.

Scary and at this point even more accurate than when I read it initially

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or corona propaganda and a false flag

21
morethanaconquerer2 21 points ago +21 / -0

4 days from now you'll find out. The left are planning a siege on the White House on the 4th.

51
deleted 51 points ago +51 / -0
38
FireannDireach 38 points ago +38 / -0

They think like children. Even if they were to gain occupancy of the WH illegally, that doesn't mean they get to undo a fair and legal election. They just get arrested and tried for insurrection, or end up dead on the White House lawn.

They won't get far past the fence, anyway.

But I believe some of them have been radicalized enough to try.

We're potentially going to be deep in the weeds Tuesday night/Wednesday morning. We may have to deal with things nobody ever thought we would. HOPEFULLY they're all talk, but some useful idiots may suicide by SS/Marine/National Guard.

17
Gold-Eyed-Cat 17 points ago +17 / -0

Heh. The first one to jump the fence and run full speed at the White House gets his head turned into red mist... ALL of Soros' rioters and LARPers run home to mommy.

11
FireannDireach 11 points ago +11 / -0

Absolutely. We haven't seen the White House truly defend itself, or seen what the military and SS can bring to the party.

1
brsmith77 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not gonna lie, I would probably watch that over and over with a box of popcorn.

12
Frog_Anne 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, the media and other Democrats have been trying their best to radicalize the loons. They keep demonizing Trump and his supporters, breathlessly claiming lives are "literally in danger!!1!" and lying about everything. If they get a few loons worked up enough to attack the White House, they might have bodies they can film. There's nothing the media love more than dead bodies, it gets everyone to pay attention to them.

1
obamagavemeaphone 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's nothing the media love more than dead bodies, it gets everyone to pay attention to them.

Oh?!?!

Then why the fuck won't they show the piles of dead ChynaVirus victims?!?!?! I was promised stacks of bodies!!!

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

That will put dogs on them

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately we probably wouldn’t be able to watch this on livestreams

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
5
KGB82 5 points ago +5 / -0

"There was a FIREFIGHT!"

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
-8
Slyhillary -8 points ago +2 / -10

But President Trump isn't left wing.

4
TheFountainhead 4 points ago +4 / -0

FAAFO OH PLEASEEEE #FAAFO!

3
morethanaconquerer2 3 points ago +3 / -0

I doubt they follow through either, but if they try, I hope they do it at night. That would be an incredible light show.

23
ClownTamer 23 points ago +23 / -0

I hope it rains. Their convictions don’t run deep enough to endure discomfort. They’d cancel a civil war over rain.

16
0io- 16 points ago +16 / -0

they should broadcast Handmaid's Tale or Twilight or Harry Potter on TV. "can't go to the raid, wife's boyfriend asked me to make popcorn, sorry!"

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or release a director’s cut of Cuties. Really sad that film exists.

3
JusticeforNatalie 3 points ago +3 / -0

They'll also forget to vote if it rains.

17
Phil_DeGraves 17 points ago +18 / -1

The left are planning a siege on the White House on the 4th.

Well that'll improve the gene pool a little!

12
0io- 12 points ago +12 / -0

Dude, they totally raided Area 51 and we all had to fly away in our saucers because their raids are SERIOUS BUSINESS.

2
Phil_DeGraves 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, their hilarious "siege of the White House" they're planning is going to be just as hilariously pathetic as the Area 51 siege was. Eight pale, thin vegans sipping cruelty-free soy lattes will show up and form a drum circle and chant shit. OOOOH I'M SO SCARED! Call the military, WE NEED REINFORCEMENTS! Bwahahahaha!

0
MonstersFromSpace 0 points ago +2 / -2

I am still affraid to get back... Are they gone now?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
0
christianknight 0 points ago +2 / -2

Fredom wont hava a chance either

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
Phil_DeGraves 7 points ago +7 / -0

EBS is long gone. EAS (Emergency Alert System) is the current system. I'm not sure if it's ever been used.

5
lixa 5 points ago +5 / -0

It gets used in California as a text alert.

4
ILikeMyBlueCar 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s abused like a step child in Colorado. Every other day I’m getting that damn screech from my phone with it saying “PLEASE WEAR A MASK”.

3
CousinEddie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when the dipshits in hawaii accidentally used it and said ballistic missiles were incoming? People were climbing into storm drains and shit.

1
Mr_Noh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where's Pennywise when you really need him...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
donaldismydad 5 points ago +6 / -1

i believe the REEEEEEELECTION of DJT45 heard round the cosmos would be a great time to pop that cherry...the white liberal MELTDOWN could go full supernova

3
glasscrawler 3 points ago +3 / -0

"A required monthly test"

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
5
Santa_Liqueur 5 points ago +5 / -0

AMBER ALERT: Attempted abduction of 1-day old election. Last seen in MAGA country in Biden/Harris van, w/LIC SLPYJ0E (DC).

3
Msmisfake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Snopes will then fact check it as “mostly false”

“While yes Trump did indeed get reelected, he is not our favorite president REEEEEE”

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
jealousminarchist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tech-pew-nical diffi-pew-culties.

1
AutumnCrystal7777777 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could POTUS order the military to report the results from the polls to the press/people. One officer per polling station, problem solved.

206
Ragnar_Danneskjold 206 points ago +206 / -0

I've been speculating for months that they will likely try to do that. All they need to do is report that Biden won for a few hours late election night leading into the next morning, and then even if they "backtrack" later on the 4th, they'll do it in a way that makes it sound hazy and uncertain. Even just a few hours of hearing that Biden was the winner will be enough to cement in the minds of likely hundreds of thousands of people that Biden really won, and nothing will ever convince them otherwise. Those people will believe Biden really won 50 years from now. If Trump actually wins and is re-inaugurated, the Left will absolutely be planning on more violence, resistance bullshit, and trying to get Trump removed through 4 more years of made up scandals and frauds. Having a few hundred thousand die hard believers who "know" to their very core that Biden really won will prove a useful resource to them. So it's entirely plausible, and I believe likely, that the MSM will use this ploy.

EDIT: Also, remember our MiniTruth overseers at Facebook and Twitter have already said that they will be deleting any posts from the Republican side claiming victory, but they will not being censoring posts from the Communist side claiming that they won. They've already told us that they plan on pushing a Biden Victory narrative no matter what actually happens.

66
MAGANatsFan 66 points ago +66 / -0

Scary.

33
1in1024th 33 points ago +33 / -0

Dare I say, spooky

How do we counter this?

38
EagleI 38 points ago +38 / -0

Not much we can do but get out ahead of this early. Prep your digital ammo. Tons of photos and videos of Trump rally crowds. Tons of comparisons to Biden rally crowds. Archive posts with Trump positive polls. Be prepared to archive media inconsistencies. They usually slip up in the first hours. Edit: this scenario is assuming Trump still takes office but Democrat conspiracies.

19
tombombadil 19 points ago +19 / -0

OAN and Newsmax should have the real results

28
TheFountainhead 28 points ago +28 / -0

We scream trump wins from the rooftops. I also think trump is smart enough to declare victory when appropriate.

There’s enough right wing or fair outlets that it can’t possibly be all one sided anyhow.

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine this scenario: Trump declares victory via Twitter on election night. Twitter suspends his account.

2
TheFountainhead 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guess we would see trump unleashed

25
Maga2020Maga2020 25 points ago +25 / -0

If we ever have secure voting, the democrats would not win another election.

16
FragrantDude 16 points ago +16 / -0

They will be reporting the actual results for at least a little while on the 3rd. How long remains to be seen, but make sure you get screenshots and evidence to share after they start activating their fake narrative. Retweet and share all the sources you can find that are reporting the true results. This is going to have to be a grassroots effort since the collectivist media won't do it for us.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
47
td2020 47 points ago +47 / -0

This seems like the likely play. It would be an absolute mess. You would probably also see Biden come out immediately and declare victory, too.

I'm assuming the Trump administration has considered this. Hopefully they've got something up their sleeve to prevent it.

The only thing I can think of is that, this is a bit different than choosing not to report on a story (like Hunter's laptop.) And, not that the media wouldn't straight up lie to the American people, but usually when they do lie, it's always some kind of a spin based on some anonymous source, which gives them a form of deniability.

They can't really fake the numbers and claim they had a bad source later. Those are concrete numbers from a very specific source. So, I'd have to imagine that misreporting them could open them up to some serious legal consequences.

I still think you're right in that they would walk it back. But, hopefully what happens is that a couple of the non-Fox big outlets are too afraid of the legal consequences, so that even if someone like CNN tries to pull some shit, they would be the only ones.

36
donaldismydad 36 points ago +37 / -1

"legal consequence" for Demoncrats? those, my fren, are reserved strictly for MAGA patriots, obvi

11
julianReyes 11 points ago +12 / -1

They've already been signalling this with the "Red Mirage" narrative for QUITE a while now. That we don't have a concrete response formulated yet is quite concerning.

10
FireannDireach 10 points ago +11 / -1

Hopefully they've got something up their sleeve to prevent it.

It's called marshal law.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
14
covfefeUK2020 14 points ago +14 / -0

Pump money into Western Europe’s recovery to stave off the threat of communism

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, yeah, yeah. :D

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Laying down the law!

35
deleted 35 points ago +35 / -0
37
kjj9 37 points ago +37 / -0

You only think that they'd try this because they did it in 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, and 2016.

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
6
BigIronBigIron 6 points ago +7 / -1

Baaaah they wouldn't dare try this

20
EagleI 20 points ago +20 / -0

I'd like to believe our people are fired up to cast their vote regardless of media BS.

10
lixa 10 points ago +10 / -0

This whole idea is horrific.

1
MAGA_mermaid 1 point ago +1 / -0

AZ GOP is actually hiring “poll butlers” to pass out water and snacks at each polling place and encourage people to stay in line! I imagine other states are doing something similar!

8
glow-operator-2-0 8 points ago +8 / -0

They are going to regret it.

5
EagleI 5 points ago +5 / -0

THIS ^

119
BeerAndCope 119 points ago +119 / -0

They’ve also been pushing the term “consensus winner”. That’s a made up term. There has never before been a “consensus winner.”

That is setting the stage for Fox to call it for Trump on election night, big tech to censor any reporting of it, and then allow NYT and CNN to call it for Biden creating a “consensus winner”.

Just to tack onto this, they will be able to project a winner late on election night. All of this “Not until the last vote is counted” talk is bullshit. In almost all cases they can look at the votes counted, votes left to count, where the remaining votes are coming from, and know who the winner of the state is even at 50-70% of the vote being in. In 2016 Fox called Wisconsin, a close race, with like 15% of the vote still out. Even CNN called Wisconsin with 10% of the vote still out. Unless it is extremely extremely close and every battle ground state is decided by a few thousand votes, we’re going to know a winner late that night. It’s just a matter of if the media will do their job and report on it.

51
NewUser101 51 points ago +52 / -1

This is true only when fraud isn't in play.

This election there are literally millions of ballots which have been sent out which could be intercepted/collected by Democrats, filled in straight ticket, trucked to each States' equivalent of Broward or Maricopa county, and stand by to be suddenly 'found' in the days after the election.

This is how they stole one Senate seat in AZ in 2018. And at least one House seat in CA. Boxes of ballots are found, with no chain of custody, and continuously added to the counts until the results look the way the DNC wants.

Watch the statistics. When these found votes are skewed insanely and uniformly to the left, like 80%+, they are guaranteed fraudulent. I have no idea why the GOP hasn't been demanding chain of custody and statistical checks everywhere in this sort of situation.

They've had 4 years to figure out how to steal an election landslide bigger than they could handle, which happened in 2016. This talk of a "red mirage" on NPR and elsewhere is prepping people for their tactics here.

If you can, watch the polls. If your county starts to get deliveries without chain of custody, you have to report.

19
SaladBin 19 points ago +19 / -0

It's the reason Pennsylvania extension needs to be shut down.

12
Maga2020Maga2020 12 points ago +13 / -1

ACB failed already on that issue it seems.

1
OffendingSomeone 1 point ago +1 / -0

ACB had nothing to do with that decision. It was decided 4-4 before she had even been confirmed.

1
Maga2020Maga2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was some new ruling I heard she was a part of though (yes already).

16
FireannDireach 16 points ago +16 / -0

That is setting the stage for Fox to call it for Trump on election night, big tech to censor any reporting of it, and then allow NYT and CNN to call it for Biden creating a “consensus winner”.

And we have a stacked Supreme Court to say "Yeah, that's not how any of it fucking works, you dipshits."

1
daberoniandcheese 1 point ago +1 / -0

The court will be our ace in the hole if we need it. Thank the Lord we got to appoint three new justices in the last four years. We may end up needing every single one.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
59
deleted 59 points ago +60 / -1
34
ClownTamer 34 points ago +34 / -0

The culture war, riots, looting, and general unrest is about as close as we could come to a civil war. If Trump were to cut off federal aid, and red states simply stopped shipping into CA, and they wouldn’t allow planes overhead to fly over them to get to CA, we’d instantly have to give in. I almost want that to happen just to kick out the governor. Blue states are basically CA and NY and some holders on. Even then, it’s mostly where I’m at in the Bay and LA out here, the rest of CA’s mostly red.

If there was a civil war, it’d be between the Bay Area+LA+the Dying NY and the rest of the US. There would be no hope of winning. Most patriots live around other patriots, unlike me who is knee-deep in crazy town. A civil war would mostly be Trump and everyone else finally shutting down Big Tech and the DNC’s endless tantrum by removing free money and stopping supply lines. If there was on the ground fighting, leftists here would charge with bongos and dildos in hand. More of a laugh than a threat.

13
TedCruzAteABoogaloo 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm deep in Bay Area territory too. I wish the mods or whoever runs this site would just give us state "subreddits" so we could coordinate with local patriots. I've got all kind of 3d printed ARs that I don't know what to do with

9
superspathi 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm in the bay area too. Don't need any guns though. Got more than I can use as is. Hell, I've even got swords.

4
tufftoffee 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ive been asking for state subs since we were still on reddit lol

2
ClownTamer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haha, I’d love one! How much of it did you print, just the stock?

1
TedCruzAteABoogaloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The the stock is printable, but the point is to 3d print the lower. Not legal to give you one, BUT I could sell you the 3d printer, teach you how to print it, then buy back the printer lol

What I did was buy an AR parts kit which is everything minus the lower, then I just printed the lower and assembled. There are currently a few different designs floating around the internet so I'm testing a couple.

https://ctrlpew.com/anderson-firearms-wildfire-plus-extras/

https://ctrlpew.com/u-bolt-vanguard-3d-printable-ar15-lower-receiver/

These are the 2 that are currently the best designed.

12
ShrikeDeCil 12 points ago +12 / -0

WA and OR are "A Blue metropolis" and a sea of red.

Seattle would lose to a siege so fast it would boggle. (It's hundreds of miles of road/rail to anywhere else, and they don't have three days of food, let alone TP.)

Oh. And the entire state is powered by hydro. Hydro is notoriously not city controlled.

8
maganify 8 points ago +8 / -0

From the view of the Space Needle all are blue, outside of that radius is all red.

5
ShrikeDeCil 5 points ago +5 / -0

There's some purplish at the edge of that radius, but if you cut there, the red will swamp what's left easy.

2
politicsaside 2 points ago +3 / -1

Sooo what I’m hearing from all this is that we’d win easily. What’s stopping us then? We can take these commie fucks, so why not give them the civil war they’ve been dreaming of and rid our country of their ilk?

2
crusadetiem 2 points ago +2 / -0

Easy, glowfren. Trump winning re-election is the most bloodless way to restore order.

1
almond_activator 1 point ago +1 / -0

We can take these commie fucks, so why not give them the civil war they’ve been dreaming of and rid our country of their ilk?

Because every single one of us has a sister or a brother or a cousin or a friend living in one of these large cities, and we don't particularly want to starve them to death.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
svlem 1 point ago +1 / -0

If there was on the ground fighting, leftists here would charge with bongos and dildos in hand.

HAHAHAHAHAHAA

1
WhiteTrashJesus 1 point ago +1 / -0

We need to know what the actual count is though.

57
Gwoz8881 57 points ago +57 / -0

Biden mostly won, but lost - CNN

37
colonial113 37 points ago +37 / -0

Mostly false. Biden didn't lose, Trump just got more electoral votes.

34
deleted 34 points ago +34 / -0
32
ClownTamer 32 points ago +32 / -0

That bitch still thinks she won.

9
SaladBin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thankfully Popular vote does not matter and never has.

8
MikesBigJockstrap 8 points ago +8 / -0

What? You mean 2 hivemind states don't get to speak for the other 48? PREPOSTEROUS!

3
WhoMurderedSethRich 3 points ago +3 / -0

Muh-get rid of the electoral college herp derp

1
ClownTamer 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m really glad it doesn’t. In HS I was told the electoral college system is a relic. As a. Adult, I see the genius of it. It’s what keeps the union together, and CA and NY from ruling the country by importing votes.

-4
Slyhillary -4 points ago +4 / -8

Edit: a leftist is addicted to me

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

It does matter. But it could be the way we win Cali!

2
julianReyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not according to the NSA lolololol

52
VoteCyborgTrump2040 52 points ago +52 / -0

It doesn't sound crazy to me at all. If you listen to what they're saying, they are basically plainly stating this is what they plan to do.

They are saying they won't concede. Big tech and media are saying they are going to censor anyone saying Trump won. They said that Biden is going to be declared winner months after the actual election due to trickling mail-in votes.

You can't get much closer to plainly stating that you plan to declare Biden the winner no matter what.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
6
Friendly_B 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah and in that video they had the crazy lady who was so concerned and kept putting her arms in the arm. It was weird.

20
BeerAndCope 20 points ago +20 / -0

The thing about the whole “a week or 2 later after mail in votes trickle in Biden will win” isn’t even possible. All the battleground states have that the votes must be there on Election Day. PA has to set aside votes that show up for the 3 days after for a SCOTUS ruling on if they count but I doubt there would be enough to change the outcome of the state anyway and it definitely wouldn’t take weeks to count them.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
9
BeerAndCope 9 points ago +9 / -0

Not start counting for days? That’s fucking crazy. Do you have a link?

3
lefkoslykos 3 points ago +3 / -0

some counties in PA have said they're going to wait until the next day... I haven't heard about anywhere else

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
NotTheTendies 20 points ago +20 / -0

When Big Tech is willing to censor the hashtag #lilwayne and #latinos4trump you know they are willing to censor just about anything.

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
2
WhiteTrashJesus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thats why they dropped the laptop relatively late imo

2
jealousminarchist 2 points ago +2 / -0

For 2 months tops when pedojoe will be forever hidden in a dementia ward where he belongs. Then it's gonna be the whore on the news "they robbed my future" FASD Greta-style.

46
Toughsky_Shitsky 46 points ago +50 / -4

The msm propagandists don't have to disappear a Trump win .. they'll just report that nothing is official until the Dems finish counting the votes they need to win.

Very little is being done to stop the theft of this election.

32
Phil_DeGraves 32 points ago +32 / -0

Remember 2000? "Keep doing recounts until Al Gore somehow happens to come out ahead in one of them, then instantly SHUT IT DOWN, IT'S OVER, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN!"

Luckily he never came out ahead in any of them.

22
Toughsky_Shitsky 22 points ago +23 / -1

Al Franken won his Senate seat this way ... and the repug conceded.

17
SaladBin 17 points ago +17 / -0

Yea with a Trunk full of ballots and that bullshit agreement that Republicans couldn't call them on that shit. Thirty years one party had the other crippled. Let's see how Trump handles this now.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
1
Friendly_B 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you really think the illegal immigrant voters are going to have that much of an impact? I'm not sure Trump has deported more illegals than Obama did overall. At least my understanding is that Obama's numbers were higher.

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

From an acquaintance in immigration, the reason Obama's numbers for deportation were higher is that he changed the definition of "deportation" to include those turned around / denied entry at the border for any reason.

1
Ballind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Including anchors we have at least 50MM. Yes, they matter

13
ApprenticeBossSeason 13 points ago +13 / -0

Pelosi’s counterpart in the House, House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.), called on legacy media outlets to not call next week’s election until all polling stations are closed around the country.

“Patience must take precedence over prognostication. Therefore, I am requesting that every network and media organization refrain from declaring a winner until every polling center has closed. Election Day is a celebration for our representative democracy, we must ensure that every American is encouraged to participate,” McCarthy said.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/pelosi-dont-mail-in-your-ballots-now_3557883.html

38
EvilGuy 38 points ago +38 / -0

These Democrats think that they know how Trump will react to bullshit like this now. I think with no more elections to win ever, he will surprise them with how much pain he will rain down on all of them.

Honestly if you own stock in any media company I would sell it. If you own any stock in Twitter / Facebook / Google I would sell it.

A lot of bad things are coming their way and you KNOW they know it. You saw the videos of them being questioned by the senate. Not a single smile on their faces. They do not look like people waiting out a week for their candidate to win. They were just denying all wrongdoing.

18
ShrikeDeCil 18 points ago +18 / -0

Not just sell, but short.

5
julianReyes 5 points ago +5 / -0

BUY THEM PUTS NOOOOOOW

1
ValhallaGorilla 1 point ago +1 / -0

why would you sell? social media will be on fire when trump wins.

3
Friendly_B 3 points ago +3 / -0

Twitter stock is down 30% right now.

30
Salty888 30 points ago +30 / -0

Arrows in their quiver.

18
BigIronBigIron 18 points ago +18 / -0

We've got those too.

10
arturia 10 points ago +10 / -0

We have EVERYTHING

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
29
williammcfadden 29 points ago +29 / -0

Fox News wouldn’t dare try this. They will call Trump the winner first if possible.

34
nsulltan 34 points ago +34 / -0

They didn’t last time European news called it 20 minutes before the American press could stop shitting themselves.

19
k614 19 points ago +19 / -0

Fox News was the first to break that Democrats won the house in 2018, and early, without any evidence. Which affected plenty of races in California, on top of the monumental voter fraud already in place.

7
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 7 points ago +7 / -0

Several hours before the polling stations closed in California and other parts of the west coast.

23
clrdark 23 points ago +23 / -0

The ridiculous polls that show Biden winning by 17% and more are not suppression polls to discourage Republican voters, they are permission polls for Democrat rioters BLM and ANTIFA when Trump wins.

Propagandists will screech, "How could Trump win without cheating. ALL our polls had Honest Joe ahead by miles just days before the election. Unleash the 36 year-old skateboarding KIDS and the 46 year-old snowboarders."

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
22
frankblank 22 points ago +22 / -0

One problem with this move is that it conflicts with (mail-in) ballot fraud attempts.

14
1in1024th 14 points ago +14 / -0

This. They'll report skewed numbers AND say "not yet"

2
SaladBin 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a week to really be sure they'll say.

19
man-with-no_name 19 points ago +19 / -0

Its going to have to be a monumental landslide in Trumps favor to get the misledia to declare Trump the winner election night. And even then I'm not sure they will. No matter how much Trump is winning by on election night the fake news will have their marching orders to not declare him the victor and say they have to wait several days or even weeks for all the mail in ballots to be counted.

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
16
Poizike 16 points ago +16 / -0

These people follow no moral code and have no values—nothing is out of the realm of possibility for them.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
15
Trump4WorldPresident 15 points ago +15 / -0

Breitrbart, OANN, Fox News.

Good luck convincing them. Fox is only in for the money, but they're gonna keep it flowing

9
EagleI 9 points ago +9 / -0

Epoch Times too

4
Friendly_B 4 points ago +4 / -0

I appreciate my subscription to them.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
5
ValhallaGorilla 5 points ago +5 / -0

AP still has "some" decency, and everyone believes AP reporting, since they were first to call Trump victory in 2016

https://apnews.com/article/AP-race-calls-elections-2020-Biden-Trump-0c7140ebd537a0b7c2120bb0e8a87f97

1
800080 1 point ago +1 / -0

Each news outlet wants to be the first to call states and the election correctly. This somewhat keeps them honest. BUT a lot of them get their numbers from the same source. Often it's the AP.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
one3five 3 points ago +3 / -0

Definitely Info Wars. The latest JRE interview with Alex Jones has over 10 million views on YT and it only aired four days ago. Alex has an enormous audience even after Big Tech tried to disappear him from teh interwebz.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
1
Mr_Noh 1 point ago +1 / -0

IIRC that was more an issue of polling methods being flawed than deliberate fraud, though.

12
axrevolutionai 12 points ago +12 / -0

Hillary won the popular vote through voter fraud, buses and buses of illegals

we have the wall. we ended catch and release. they don't have their livestock.

Not to mention, Hillary had actual supporters (brain washed women and soyboy cucks) while Biden has gibberish we make memes out of

12
CREHWT 12 points ago +12 / -0

Chilling

11
Phouglas 11 points ago +11 / -0

Biden did say today that he didn’t need voters to win.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
politicsaside 6 points ago +6 / -0

He did! He said something like, “I don’t need you to vote for me to win. I need your support after I win.” I think he had another brain fart and meant to say, “I don’t JUST need you to vote for me, I need your support after...” and he just left out the “just”, but it could’ve also been him accidentally letting the cat out of the bag too.

1
N0-F3D 1 point ago +1 / -0

Between Biden and Pelosi, if we assume they are losing their mental acuity and letting the cat out of the bag with Freudian slips, this is some pretty blatant admission of the election fraud they've got in the works.

Biden (10/24 podcast): Secondly, we’re in a situation where we have put together — and you’d [sic] guys, did it for our, the president Obama’s administration, before this — we have put together, I think, the most extensive and and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics.

Pelosi (10/29 press conference): "I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected President on Tuesday. Whatever the end count is on the election that occurs on Tuesday, he will be elected, on January 20th he will be inaugurated President."

Biden (10/31 speech): “Folks, we got a lot of work to do. I don’t need you to get me elected, I need you once I’m elected.”

He has the largest voter fraud apparatus in history. No matter what the end count is, he will be inaugurated. He doesn't need voters to get elected.

We need to make sure to vote in such overwhelming numbers, we can counteract all the fraud, lies, distortion and deception the left/media has in store for us over the next few days.

11
TehAgent 11 points ago +11 / -0

I basically asked this question roughly a month ago.

I said whats to say that the media doesnt declare Biden the winner and cause chaos when Trump is the true victor? All they have to do is tell people that Biden won after polls close and deadlines pass and BAM mass violence and riots.

This scenario is the exact reason i stockpiled ammo and bought a plate carrier. I didnt pose the question as far back as April but thats when I started thinking about it and stocking up.

Im taking a rifle and my armor to work Wednesday the 4th. I live in a small town but work in a city that almost always votes solid deep blue. I may just work from home that day, which is an option. I already do it Tue and Thurs every week already...I could just swap a day.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
800080 2 points ago +2 / -0

Work at home. More to protect there.

8
phil_d_snutz 8 points ago +9 / -1

If dems are planning on falsely claiming Biden won, why didn't they do that in 2016 with Hillary?

19
mathman 19 points ago +19 / -0

Good question. In 2016, they didn't have any contingency plans because they never thought it would be necessary. Then they were reluctant to take any extreme actions because they hadn't thought of all the possible consequences.

None of that is true this time. They already had their "war games" simulation a few months ago, and even decided to publicize it. They played it all out and really liked the feeling of openly stealing an election by refusing to concede any facts. I honestly think it will take the Insurrection Act, some well-founded treason charges, and a few hundred lifetime vacations at Gitmo to settle it now.

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
Droford 2 points ago +2 / -0

My feeling is the same surprise from 2016 will happen and it'll catch them off guard a 2nd time

9
Jcholl9 9 points ago +9 / -0

Back in 2016 they thought the American people were stupid and that there wasn't enough of us to actually elect Trump... But we proved them wrong.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Jcholl9 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not over until it's over... Biden still has one thing going for him which is Voter fraud.

Don't get cocky thinking Trump has enough Votes? We need to spread the word, I have...

9
EagleI 9 points ago +9 / -0

They thought they would win. When they didn't, it was a surprise and they hadn't planned appropriately. They know Biden is going to lose.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
5
superspathi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Taken by surprise.

8
geebeext 8 points ago +8 / -0

Seems to me that would be definition of a coup/insurrection. That when mass arrests should take place, if only there were a law enforcement organization that actually worked for the american people

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
GeoG85 8 points ago +8 / -0

I presumed that awhile ago, since CNN and Fake News stopped the bullshit a month ago, and 'tried' to report real news.

The Deep State is stupid enough to believe some autistic fortune cookie-esque message that has you focus on one cog of the machine while ignoring the rest - a la, "Don't control the votes! Control who announces the winnnerrrrrrrr!"

That's why the Hunter Leak was great because it premature ejaculates them.

7
TRIGGERED_BY_CHALK 7 points ago +11 / -4

Fuck this cuck.

"Trump lost my vote, I cannot support someone who is implicitly telling half the country he won’t condemn white supremacy. This is how you “condemn” white supremacy when you don’t really want to condemn it... Chris Wallace did a great job of moderating, nobody could have done better" -Scott Adams

8
Phil_DeGraves 8 points ago +8 / -0

...he won’t condemn white supremacy. This is how you “condemn” white supremacy when you don’t really want to condemn it

Maybe this dude can watch the... what, 38?.... times Trump condemned it on video, and see if any of them seem sincere enough for his liking.

What a tool.

6
TRIGGERED_BY_CHALK 6 points ago +7 / -1

Never liked him. He's been riding Trump's coattails for how long now? He's a fraud.

5
FireannDireach 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's a cartoonist, not a political journalist or scholar. And he's a hypnotist who likes to go on about persuasive speech and such - and has been all over the map politically and socially. Anyone who thinks Bloomberg would make a good president and say that publically is suspect in my book.

I've watched his videos once in a while, but I've always gotten some snake oil whiffs off him. I don't really pay attention to him, except when the No Agenda podcast talks about him.

3
Shivore 3 points ago +4 / -1

That quote is pretty well taken out of context. The previous sentence or so is Scott Adams telling people that he knows about the other condemnations, that what he is about to say (the quoted portion) is strictly about the debate performance that night.

He also said the next day that Trump got his vote back by clearly denouncing white supremacy in an interview.

For Scott Adams it was 1: never about denouncing or not, but how Trump presented himself to the public, and by that metric the debate question was not his best and 2: Scott said the next week that it was his way of getting the Left to actually pay attention to him for a couple of days and actually got some to watch his stuff for a little bit. It was all a ploy.

Scott was never not voting for Trump. Scott just has this way of getting people riled up by saying stuff like this.

1
Phil_DeGraves 1 point ago +1 / -0

it was his way of getting the Left to actually pay attention to him for a couple of days and actually got some to watch his stuff for a little bit. It was all a ploy.

Four-dimensional chess, like our beloved GEOTUS. Advanced trolling! Nice.

4
AussieTrumpSupporter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Where did he say that? I think he's voting for Trump. He said fuck Joe Biden.

4
5
AussieTrumpSupporter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Seems like this is before he knew about "the fine people hoax" he so often talks about. He hates Biden and won't be voting for him. I assume he is voting straight Republican especially given Trump has denounced white supremacy.

3
lixa 3 points ago +5 / -2

I guess you stopped listening to him after that, he's done a 180 on all of that. I started with the episode where he was mad that Trump wasn't talking about rapid covid tests and said he wouldn't vote for him unless he discussed it which pissed me off. He also had a weird freaky day where he was mad about the fire relief before admitting he was wrong. He falls off the train now and then which is weird, but lately he's been extremely positive and clear thinking about Trump otherwise.

1
TRIGGERED_BY_CHALK 1 point ago +4 / -3

I mean, that's good for him. Still a cuck though. The very definition of.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
lixa 0 points ago +2 / -2

Pretty sure he just plain fucked that one up.

2
Phouglas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Link?

2
2
AussieTrumpSupporter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seems like this is before he knew about "the fine people hoax" he so often talks about. He hates Biden and won't be voting for him. I assume he is voting straight Republican especially given Trump has denounced white supremacy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
SaladBin 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's what Antifa is waiting for do what they failed to do in Germany

1
one3five 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well worth the time to read albeit terrifying. Thank you for posting the link.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
A1waysLurk1ing 5 points ago +5 / -0

1984 was a playbook.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
superspathi 3 points ago +3 / -0

Would be more fun to remove commies while seeing their faces.

And why irradiate one of the most strategic natural harbors in the world?

4
Ms_deplorable 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is what I’ve been saying is their plan for months.

4
WhiteLash 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me thinks they will ban Trump from twitter and run that Biden has already won on election night and the rest of the week onward.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
Mr_Noh 1 point ago +1 / -0

IIRC they have banned him temporarily a few times. Granted, however, that wasn't election day.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
magasumo 4 points ago +4 / -0

FAAFO

4
isitpedanticenough 4 points ago +4 / -0

The only thing that would stop these liars is a landslide of epic proportions

4
FuckReddit4545 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wouldn't put anything past these people. If they pull something like that it's fucking go time. There is not point in hiding any longer, the entire country is at stake.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
Forte 4 points ago +4 / -0

They might run the narrative but it isn't going to change the reality that Trump won. Unless there's some serious shenanigans going on in all branches of government that would ultimately result in a revolution.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
DontBeACuck 4 points ago +6 / -2

That.

Is.

Their.

Fucking.

Plan.

We dont get out of this without an actual fight. Read a history book. Human nature doesnt change. Communists dont change.

4
tonightm16 4 points ago +4 / -0

Would require worldwide censorship on levels not seen even by today's standards.

Also, they could have done this in 2016 and would have been easier to do back then.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
RabidZoo 3 points ago +3 / -0

PATRIOTIC REVOLT

3
Droford 3 points ago +3 / -0

Biden getting to play president for the media while Trump is the actual President seems like a cruel joke on a senior citizen with Dementia

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
MAGAbeast2016 2 points ago +2 / -0

Our guns

2
lalicat 2 points ago +2 / -0

About 200 million armed patriots. Do it .... Look at me, do it!

I double dog dare you to try.

2
Notablitheringidiot 2 points ago +3 / -1

That’s already happened and it’s called Weimar Germany.

2
OwnaLib87 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that’s a major reason for this censorship seven been seeing. I think that’s their plan.

2
JohnMcCainsTumors 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly what's going to happen. Grab your guns. It's coming..

2
CyclopticErotica 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think this is exactly what they intend to do.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0