Ok.. I see, they don't mean a multi national court.. what they mean is the Supreme Court that we already have.
My answer is still no.
Refer to the Constitution.
It's called the Supreme Court... it exists already.
Germany and France have already signed their sovereignty over to the EU courts. German and French courts are irrelevant because the European Supreme Court has the final say.
No...go back to your padded room you fucking worthless vestigial Soviet anachronism...insane doesn't even begin to describe this shit stain of a newspaper!
Let me guess, this new court will be higher than the court that is written into the Constitution to do exactly what the new court is supposed to be for?
Since they have been unable to destroy the founding documents, though they've done a great job perverting them, they want to supersede America through internationalism.
That's why when someone crosses twatters lines that the message they receive discusses German law.
Make no mistake - the mere suggesting of this is fighting words.
We literally have that already. It's called the Supreme Court.
Yeah...we invented the very concept.
Sounds like they're calling for more hardline originalists on the court? Okay, works for me!
No, because that would mean the Supreme court is completely based on fee fees.
No you don't understand..... This one's "special "
They're not idiots. They have a specific globalist agenda, and they write articles like these with intention.
If you repeat a crazy idea enough, it becomes valid in peoples' minds. They want fundamentally alter our country in a very, very dangerous way.
The reason Big Tech is having so much censorship is because they put non-Americans in charge of it.
So, not only no, but HELL NO!
NYT using Germany and France as comparative examples. Super brains running that fucking rag.
The New York Times further explores the question, "Just how far do the depths of mental retardation go?"
WTF we already have one!
What the fuck are these lunatics on about?
Isn't that the job of the Supreme Court?
What the hell? No. Hell no. Our forefathers didn't fight and die so that people in Germany could decide our fate.
Ok.. I see, they don't mean a multi national court.. what they mean is the Supreme Court that we already have. My answer is still no. Refer to the Constitution.
No NYT...WE are the constitution...the only one true great experiment!!
Lol 😂🤣 donkey 💩
So they want us to join the EU, HAHAHAHA
It's called the Supreme Court... it exists already.
Germany and France have already signed their sovereignty over to the EU courts. German and French courts are irrelevant because the European Supreme Court has the final say.
No...go back to your padded room you fucking worthless vestigial Soviet anachronism...insane doesn't even begin to describe this shit stain of a newspaper!
How about fuck no!
There answers no. We can not let these people into power. We may need to Pinochet em honestly... I think its gone too far to fix naturaly
Not the Bee worthy.
You want to start WWIII?
Let me guess, this new court will be higher than the court that is written into the Constitution to do exactly what the new court is supposed to be for?
Hard no.
Since they have been unable to destroy the founding documents, though they've done a great job perverting them, they want to supersede America through internationalism.
That's why when someone crosses twatters lines that the message they receive discusses German law.
Make no mistake - the mere suggesting of this is fighting words.
WAR