I live in Brooklyn voted Trump last Thursday, I can confirm the Jewish block is fed up with the dems, deblasio and cumo have royally pissed them off. It's very possible
Anything less that a total fucking blowout is unacceptable - these cock suckers have been throwing a fit for 4 years culminating in billions of dollars of damage and dozens of dead bodies - all in the name of The Democrat Party
They need to be excluded from power for at least 10 years so they can work on not hating American families.
I don't get why WI is blue, either. Early voting and mail-in voting shows Republicans and Democrats are neck and neck, when Democrats are supposed to be up big. And most of the remaining people to vote in WI are Trump supporters. What am I missing?
Presidents, when re-elected, almost always win with more electoral votes than when they are first elected to office. That holds true for all re-elected presidents but one, going back to Eisenhower (as far back as I looked). The notable exception? Obama, who received 365 electoral votes in 2008, and 332 in 2012.
Seems to be. Even Bush, who just squeaked out a win in 2000, went from 271 EVs to 286 EVs in 2004. Modest increase, but an increase nevertheless.
Eisenhower: 442 in 1952, 457 in 1956;
Nixon: 301 in 1968, 520 in 1972;
Reagan: 489 in 1980, 525 in 1984;
Clinton: 370 in 1992, 379 in 1996;
Bush: 271 in 2000, 286 in 2004;
Obama: 365 in 2008, 332 in 2012
Great info. For Obama, Hope and Change wore off by that second election. He didn't have the results and didn't knock out his campaign promises, especially considering his party had control of congress for 2 years.
Compared to Trump, he has a long list of achievements and completing his campaign promises.
look at your ballot before you go. Not all republicans are marked. Some positions are 'non partisan'. Mine has several bond initiatives. 2 are ok, 1 is a money sink that will do nothing.
Please, God, make this real. I am serious when I say that! Also, 279 electoral votes??????????????? Those are rookie numbers! You gotta up that total! GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To be fair he might just be pointing that a mainstream source is for the first time presenting Trumps win as a viable outcome. I think he has done other commemtary where hes looked at the potential outstanding vote and noted it could be a red wave.
Don't know where I saw that. Dems have a big lead in NH in early and mail-in voting, but the amount of total votes cast so far is pretty low. A GOP surge is still very likely in NH.
Guys remember - the Democrats will stop at NOTHING to make sure that your vote doesn't count or that you're blocked from voting. When you go to the polls on the 3rd, EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED.
I'm serious. They will go to the grave on this, and they want to catch you by surprise so that you don't know what to do/make a mistake.
Please upvote so that everyone can see and be reminded. CRITICAL!
I dont know why they keep lyin to themselves. I guess they dont know how to be honest. I feel bad for all their drone viewers who are going to be on suicide watch the morning of November 4th when Trump has secured a landslide victory
Yup. They also predicted Wisconsin would be Clinton by 9 points.
The media tried to claim that they were within the margin of error after the fact, but I remember the day before the election (I lived in WI at the time) that it was 9 points.
I think they know. In 2016, I think they believed their polls and were surprised by Trump's win. This time around, I think they know the polls are wrong, but have tried to use them and the story they tell to manipulate the election. Now that the day is almost here and it seems their efforts have mostly failed, they might drop the pretense. Or, if the election is close and the result contested, they'll double down and use the false polling data to bolster an election fraud story in favor of Biden's claim.
It is pretty disingenuous the way they say "Biden has a lead". What they mean is registered democrats have a lead. And for some states even THAT isnt really known, just estimated.
I’ve been looking at NBC, CNN, and NY Times (all of which I know are liberal) in regards to the current polling results and they all show Joe Biden with a firm lead. NY Times even went as far as to say that if the polls were as wrong as they were in 2016, Joe still has the lead. I don’t understand how this is possible. Is it really that close? Is it going to be a red flood on Tuesday? Is that historically how it went?
So what everyone I think? seems to be missing from good ol' MSM is that no votes have been counted yet. They are ballots from registered D's or R's or I's.
When they count those D's ballots up I feel like there is a special surprise waiting.
LOL Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, California, New York all going red. Even Washington maybe...anyways it is still Trump wining. I'm glad I got a case of popcorn for Tuesday night
Red Tuesday is right. The Democrats are going to have a case of the Red Ass!
I swear to God, If NY goes red I'll lose my mind.
I live in Brooklyn voted Trump last Thursday, I can confirm the Jewish block is fed up with the dems, deblasio and cumo have royally pissed them off. It's very possible
We’ll be there!!!!!
It can’t be narrow.
It has to be an historic landslide.
There can be NO doubt, no glimmer of hope for the left.
It must be painful.
Anything less that a total fucking blowout is unacceptable - these cock suckers have been throwing a fit for 4 years culminating in billions of dollars of damage and dozens of dead bodies - all in the name of The Democrat Party
They need to be excluded from power for at least 10 years so they can work on not hating American families.
I don't like my wins narrow... I like 'em W I D E !
And stretchin Gretchen's back door
Shitty joke
“Narrowly win”...sure CBS
If Republicans show up for Trump?
Almost sounds like a hint to ‘protest’ at the polls.
Dog whistle?
GEOTUS has more support than Reagan from Republicans now after his first term.
I don't get why PA is red but MI is blue. Early voting shows Trump is doing better in MI than he is in PA--but I think he'll win both.
I swear some of these polls are just using a coin flipping simulator to figure out whats going on.
Keep in mind that the results from 2016 were very narrow in some of the states Trump won. There's been 4 years of migration since. It will be tight.
Not just that but based old geezers passing on and young indoctrinated fools coming of voting age.
Well, they use that shit for climate predictions and virus death predictions. Why the hell not flo a coin for election results, too?
We can't use early voting for election results. They change with the wind.
They're still more reliable than polls IMO
Good pollsters know the problems with early voting. It can't tell us who's going to win.
I don't get why WI is blue, either. Early voting and mail-in voting shows Republicans and Democrats are neck and neck, when Democrats are supposed to be up big. And most of the remaining people to vote in WI are Trump supporters. What am I missing?
Voter fraud
Presidents, when re-elected, almost always win with more electoral votes than when they are first elected to office. That holds true for all re-elected presidents but one, going back to Eisenhower (as far back as I looked). The notable exception? Obama, who received 365 electoral votes in 2008, and 332 in 2012.
Seems to be. Even Bush, who just squeaked out a win in 2000, went from 271 EVs to 286 EVs in 2004. Modest increase, but an increase nevertheless.
Eisenhower: 442 in 1952, 457 in 1956; Nixon: 301 in 1968, 520 in 1972; Reagan: 489 in 1980, 525 in 1984; Clinton: 370 in 1992, 379 in 1996; Bush: 271 in 2000, 286 in 2004; Obama: 365 in 2008, 332 in 2012
and a semi-fair media
Explains why Zerobama showing up late to help campaign doesn't actually help.
The magic must have already been wearing off, because no one was excited about Mitt.
Great info. For Obama, Hope and Change wore off by that second election. He didn't have the results and didn't knock out his campaign promises, especially considering his party had control of congress for 2 years.
Compared to Trump, he has a long list of achievements and completing his campaign promises.
Trump with 279 EC votes. lol
330ish. Check 'em.
And that's exactly what most of us are doing lol womp womp
I’m not even a registered republican
As long as you vote red on Tuesday that's all that matters
Straight red, going before work
Get up extra early. This election is the nuttiest in my long life.
look at your ballot before you go. Not all republicans are marked. Some positions are 'non partisan'. Mine has several bond initiatives. 2 are ok, 1 is a money sink that will do nothing.
Samesies
Please, God, make this real. I am serious when I say that! Also, 279 electoral votes??????????????? Those are rookie numbers! You gotta up that total! GET TO THE CHOPPA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
To be fair he might just be pointing that a mainstream source is for the first time presenting Trumps win as a viable outcome. I think he has done other commemtary where hes looked at the potential outstanding vote and noted it could be a red wave.
This. Trump has something like 95% approval among Republicans, so it's safe to assume GOP voters are almost unanimous Trump.
But there are a LOT of Democrats who are voting Trump that the results aren't showing. Just curious how much.
Tim Pool is a faggot. But, he is our faggot, as much as he pretends not to be.
VOTE VOTE VOTE
This is exactly 2016 map minus WI and MI (and 1 vote in ME) - we can do better than that!
Plus didn't I see that NH has broken for Trump today?
Don't know where I saw that. Dems have a big lead in NH in early and mail-in voting, but the amount of total votes cast so far is pretty low. A GOP surge is still very likely in NH.
Guys remember - the Democrats will stop at NOTHING to make sure that your vote doesn't count or that you're blocked from voting. When you go to the polls on the 3rd, EXPECT THE UNEXPECTED.
I'm serious. They will go to the grave on this, and they want to catch you by surprise so that you don't know what to do/make a mistake.
Please upvote so that everyone can see and be reminded. CRITICAL!
If they show up as expected we will win. Why is CBS calling this a “surge?”
if republicans show up on election day it wont be close
They are telling blm to rioting to stop voting on Tuesday
I dont know why they keep lyin to themselves. I guess they dont know how to be honest. I feel bad for all their drone viewers who are going to be on suicide watch the morning of November 4th when Trump has secured a landslide victory
Didn't they predict back in 2016 that Clinton will win NC by 7 points?
Yup. They also predicted Wisconsin would be Clinton by 9 points.
The media tried to claim that they were within the margin of error after the fact, but I remember the day before the election (I lived in WI at the time) that it was 9 points.
The media has no clue what's coming
I think they know. In 2016, I think they believed their polls and were surprised by Trump's win. This time around, I think they know the polls are wrong, but have tried to use them and the story they tell to manipulate the election. Now that the day is almost here and it seems their efforts have mostly failed, they might drop the pretense. Or, if the election is close and the result contested, they'll double down and use the false polling data to bolster an election fraud story in favor of Biden's claim.
Rookie numbers. Gotta pump 'em up!!!
RED TUESDAY
It is pretty disingenuous the way they say "Biden has a lead". What they mean is registered democrats have a lead. And for some states even THAT isnt really known, just estimated.
Trying to soften the blow
In my mind the only ones that are still in the air are PA, MI, MN, and NV. He really only needs one of those to win.
The future belongs to those who show up.
Show up.
I’ve been looking at NBC, CNN, and NY Times (all of which I know are liberal) in regards to the current polling results and they all show Joe Biden with a firm lead. NY Times even went as far as to say that if the polls were as wrong as they were in 2016, Joe still has the lead. I don’t understand how this is possible. Is it really that close? Is it going to be a red flood on Tuesday? Is that historically how it went?
Hopefully it rains and the Democrats decide to stay home
So if you treat it like 2016 polls then its going to be their predictions will be off by ~100 so 379 to 159
So what everyone I think? seems to be missing from good ol' MSM is that no votes have been counted yet. They are ballots from registered D's or R's or I's.
When they count those D's ballots up I feel like there is a special surprise waiting.
Doesn't matter. VOTE
Bull Chit...Not narrowly
He means BIGLY if we keep the foot on the gas
Ah the CYA begins!
LOL Michigan, Wisconsin, Minnesota, California, New York all going red. Even Washington maybe...anyways it is still Trump wining. I'm glad I got a case of popcorn for Tuesday night