Damn shame it took that much to prove it to them

Tim Walz: "I can't Reeeeee!"

You mean setting cities on fire wasn’t a good strategy?

Real answer, division of labor and support services. Big cities both attract Leftists and create new ones. When you live in a city, there is always a service or department or business that will do everything but your one specific job for you. Maybe you're really good at photography or writing code or you're some deadbeat noise musician or poet or whatever. You do your one thing, but you have someone else to do everything else. Someone else picks up your trash, Someone else does your laundry, someone else fixes your AC, someone else handles your security, someone else makes your food, someone else drives you where you want to go, someone else makes your morning coffee, someone else shovels the snow, and on and on. For every little normal task of life, there is someone whose job it is to do that one thing for everyone else, and all those other people are doing those things for them, except for their one specialty in turn. This naturally breeds a collectivist mindset. It stifles the ability to be self-sufficient and removes the incentive to even try. It makes one feel comfortable blending into the embrace of the group to be taken care of. People who already want that sort of lifestyle naturally flock to these places, and people who grow up or live in them for too long start to think that way even if they originally didn't.

So collectivism is built into the blueprints of cities automatically. Add in that you're around a ton of other people so social factors like trends, fashion, popularity, and other things that crop up in any large group start to play on people's emotions. Everyone is seeing all these other people around them flashing their status symbols, from better cars, newer phones, fancier clothes, better apartments, and a resentment starts to flourish, which Marxists naturally take advantage of. It's hard for any of that to happen out in the sticks where there's a family of 8 living on a chunk of land, and a mile and a half down the road there's another family of 6, and so on.

EDIT: I'll also add it that self-reliance is easy to pass on to children, but also easy to destroy and very hard to restart once destroyed. Your dad can teach you how to change a tire, shoot a .22, spackle a hole in drywall, unclog a pipe, your mom can teach you how to cook, how to get a stain out, and so forth. But if you move to a city, forget how to do those things and have kids and don't teach them, those skills are now dead. Your kid can't move out of the city when he or she grows up and suddenly know how to do those things again. They're easy to pass on by just raising your kids to do the stuff you know how to do, but if something severs that chain of skills being passed on, only one break in the chain kills it from that point on. Each subsequent generation has no place to learn any of those things and has to start all the way over from scratch relearning how to do all of it by trial and error, and will likely only do so when some extreme emergency forces them to have to when it's already too late. So when people move to cities, not only are they slowly being taken into the embrace of collectivism, anything self-reliant they might have been taught is being killed off not just for them, but for every single one of their subsequent children or grandchildren. The skills are just gone, and each generation is now trapped in collectivism and couldn't easily escape even if they realized they should and wanted to try.

Because everyone else is doing it and they need to feel validated.

Because if you're going to cheat, are you going to do it in some small town in the rural area? No, you're going right the the population center where it's easier to hide.

Thank you so much for this!

If this is true, I'd be super happy.

However, it's just an estimate.

Unfortunately TargetSmart has a different estimate. They estimate 46% - 31% for the Democrats.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-elections/minnesota-results

So I really hope that this data that you linked is more correct then TargetSmart.

Yeah, and independent there means that far left farm party that is outright commie rather than the moderate commies of the DNC.

Everyone seems to think these D voters are voting D, plenty have to be voting MAGA.

29% independent!? That's significant. Those are basically as good as Trump votes because independent voters are mostly dems who've wasted their vote for whatever reason, so every independent vote is a vote the dems missed out on.

Top Kek!!

;)

TardSmart?