978
Why does it seem like all of the "SuperSpreader" events never amount to any substantial increases in cases or deaths? Because they are lying to us about every facet of the virus. It was safer to go to Sturgis than to stay home. Attendees had under half the average infection rate of the rest of US. (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by montominco ago by montominco +978 / -0
10 comments
10 comments share save hide report block hide child comments
Comments (10)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
▲ 5 ▼
– montominco [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

No masks, no distancing at the Sturgis rally. Is it only because there were few high risk groups that attended? Do masks facilitate infection? Why are they so wrong? Did the mass BLM protests kill a bunch of people? None of these things mattered. Its a sham.

permalink save report block reply