238
Comments (5)
sorted by:
7
Dingolingo8888 7 points ago +7 / -0

The court without ACB kinda ruled that they would allow PA voting extentions but said it could be brought up after election day. I believe their opinion was they couldn't decide on something that hadn't happened yet. That's why it's cool we have ACB there. Trump is setting the table for challenging this if it becomes necessary. Let's hope he wins big enough to tell PA attorney General pound sand.

4
MostEffectualTopKek 4 points ago +5 / -1

So this decision came with ACB on the court or prior ?

WTF is going on.

4
CapnKek 4 points ago +4 / -0 (edited)

They denied a motion to expedite. ACB didn't weigh in, said she hadn't had time yet, wouldn't have made a difference. They can't deal with it until the dirty deed is done, then they can rule on what counts or not - though PA will not be segregating ballots I hear - that's the fucked up part. GEOTUS tweet to keep focus on that.

2
TrumpTrainChoooChoo2 2 points ago +2 / -0

And twitter doesn’t show the number of likes or retweets....election interference by them yet again.

2
deleted 2 points ago +4 / -2