No way. What are you thinking? Congressional districts are 50-50.
The Dems even control the House of Representatives. WTF even is your thinking here? We are trying to brainstorm ways to ensure Republican electoral dominance. Not to give them a ‘fair chance’.
Okay, but as it is now, California give the Dems 55 electoral votes. If it was split up by Congressional district, like in Nebraska or Maine, Republicans could get some of those EV's.
And even if the Dems control the house, it doesn't dictate how each district votes for President necessarily. Plus, you have two extra EV's per state representing that state's U.S. Senators. In NE and ME, those two EVs go to the popular vote winner of the state.
The problem is, Dems would split their strongly held areas into multiple counties. Micro gerrymandering.
Not if the counties are frozen at 2016 layouts.
Then Texas and Georgia would be the two biggest electoral vote prizes - the two states with the most amount of counties.
I prefer the EVs to be distributed by congressional district. No state winner take all, no basing it on how other places vote.
No way. What are you thinking? Congressional districts are 50-50.
The Dems even control the House of Representatives. WTF even is your thinking here? We are trying to brainstorm ways to ensure Republican electoral dominance. Not to give them a ‘fair chance’.
Okay, but as it is now, California give the Dems 55 electoral votes. If it was split up by Congressional district, like in Nebraska or Maine, Republicans could get some of those EV's.
And even if the Dems control the house, it doesn't dictate how each district votes for President necessarily. Plus, you have two extra EV's per state representing that state's U.S. Senators. In NE and ME, those two EVs go to the popular vote winner of the state.