320
posted ago by Shreddit ago by Shreddit +320 / -0

You know how it always is. Democrooks set up these state and local shill "election officials" who happen to be an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE to the process. They oversee rampant cheating, they know it's cheating, and in some cases they facilitate it.

This allows the Democrooks to poison federal politics, effectively robbing everyone else who plays fair. There's technically nothing stopping the Democrooks in far-left states from throwing away just enough Republican ballots (it's been happening for at least a month with mail-in and other bullsh*t) that it makes the Republicans lose without looking suspicious.

By now they could probably get away with binning every GOP ballot and their stacked-tivist courts would cover their behinds. This needs to end immediately. It's unfair to the rest of the states.

Enough is enough. You want to feed from the federal trough, you play by the nation's rules - not this self-graded cheating crap. And if you get caught cheating, you get booted out - lose your representation. States and districts that habitually cheat should be suspended or even expelled into non-voting observer status.

Comments (20)
sorted by:
8
HockeyMom4Trump 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ant state caught cheating should lose all Federal funding. All of it.

6
Shreddit [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Pull their federal funding and their representation. Void their presidential electors, cancel their Senate and House representation, suspend the authority of federal courts stationed in faulty states.

If you cheat in sports or massively multiplayer online video games, you get banned. If you cheated as part of a professional league, you may be fined, suspended, or expelled.

If you cheat in school, you get suspended and a failing grade.

If you cheat in college, you get flunked out of classes. If you persist, you get suspended, put on academic probation, or dismissed (expelled).

If you cheat in your job and cut corners to make a defective or fraudulently misrepresented product, you get sued, people return the products for a refund, and your company or group probably goes bankrupt from the backlash.

If you cheat in finance/accounting, you get sued and the SEC throws your sorry behind in jail.

Why the hell is cheating allowed in POLITICS, that controls the fate of the nation and is arguably more weighty than the above list combined???

1
HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree. Well said.

7
Dawginole 7 points ago +7 / -0

You do not want Washington to determine your state's election laws. Absolutely not. Federalism retains your voice in these decisions.

4
Pandelume 4 points ago +4 / -0

How about just voter ID?

1
Dawginole 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll take it.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
stoic_troll 6 points ago +7 / -1

Nope. I'm against this. Having a diversity of voting strategies makes the system resistant to corruption and hacking. If you were to mandate a federal system, it wouldn't be long before that was hijacked by the swamp creatures in DC.

1
Shreddit [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Federal standards would be an objective list of common-sense rules, not a whim of unelected bureaucrat #Swampsters.

5
Pukeahontas 5 points ago +6 / -1

The laws are so fucking different from county to county and states. Its a fucking joke.

8
stoic_troll 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's a good thing. It prevents manipulation at the national level. Imagine if a specific machine were mandated. You know how easily NSA could hack the election?

1
Shreddit [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. There are way too many where the election law is Democrook corruption. It's just as bad as the third-world. If they want to be like the third world then expel them from the union and let them join whatever third-world s**thole nation will take them.

3
Micdrop2017 3 points ago +3 / -0

yes...great idea

3
muslimporn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Using basic signing (hashing) it's possible to send everyone out their vote then have it possible for them to personally verify that it was counted. There's always a problem with the central system but this is easily solved with bipartisan observers and certain other methods.

I lost my job because of COVID-19. I think I'm going to work for myself and make a secure voting system. I used to make all kinds of point of sale systems that had to be secure with contingencies for all kinds of errors and honestly this is a breeze for me. I don't really understand why a country like the USA doesn't have it already. I have the IQ of a potato and just hiring me alone on peanuts relatively (under 100K) which is my normal salary would get it done in well under a year and I know this because I did it before.

I'm not kidding. A secure voting system good for all the nation costs about $15K for a prototype in terms of software and should not cost more than $100K. So you would not think it much for federal tax to spend a few million to over do it and then have it done + dusted (after that diminishing returns amount to nothing, most of the work is on anti fraud and statistical, mathematical, etc, stuff like binomial distribution and things I won't give away, no block chain nonsense, instead things that actually work you never heard of, not just all the things you heard of that makes you want to buy it even though you don't know what they actually are, note if you want to make a voting system with block chain just store all the votes using git).

My machines have been in service for years and constant use. They've been used as much as people have voted in the last two elections.

It can be powered by half of a raspberry pi first version so having in built redundancy for that each system is easy. Two of most things and if something fails it mostly gets fixed when taken off the field. You can also use your phone or what you like.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
DooSouth407 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its apparent, so why let it go on ? Lets hope Trumps team go in and expose the demons, but more important get them out of our election process.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Shreddit [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even North Korea's Little Rocket Man often "allows" the political opposition to get more than 10% at their sham elections so they can claim a "democratic process" (although it's a sham, just like the Democrooks).

1
magnokor 1 point ago +1 / -0

Very correct.

Secret Service were setup to stop counterfeiting.

Fake votes, fake counts, fake everything.

Let the Secret Service guard the vote, as the vote determines the President, who the Secret Service guard.

1
_Cabal_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

For real, I've been saying this for a while.

There's no reason states should be able to determine presidential election standards for themselves. It's a national election. Every state should adhere to a universal standard.

Civil rights laws effectively ended the purpose of having state-specific election standards, anyway. There's no need for them anymore, and there hasn't been for a long time. Yet they persist as if women and non-whites aren't constitutionally guaranteed voting rights in all states.

The presidential election, at least, should be a federal standard, not a state by state standard. And this mail-in shit needs to come to an end. Absentee should be highly limited and incredibly strict, reserved primarily for deployed military and disabled citizens. Everyone else should have to vote in person, on election day, with ID. And the states should be required to meet their respective electorate population demands.

I'd also probably be supportive of a national holiday for election day if all of this were to be implemented.